Pagans will never understand the feeling of liberating lands from muslim occupation

>Pagans will never understand the feeling of liberating lands from muslim occupation
Without the Catholic Church europe is nothing but a provider of sex slaves to muslims. In Sweden and Germany there are many pagan white boys already learning how to please muslims sexually

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=VTrMpWb7JSI
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teutonic_Order
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seventeenth_Council_of_Toledo
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Wouldn't have needed to.

>Without the Catholic Church europe is nothing but a provider of sex slaves to muslims.
>In Sweden and Germany there are many pagan white boys already learning how to please muslims sexually
How to completely BTFO yourself in one line: the post.

>Pagans will never understand the feeling of liberating lands from muslim occupation
There isn't anything particular about Christianity in this regard. Kings and their countries fought for themselves against each other and infidels alike.

Meme crusades were total failure, that didn't "liberate" an inch of anything but killed a tremendous amount of European people and resources, both throwing them away in some deserts and drowning European pagans and heretics in blood.

When muslims conquered the region of what is today Spain it was under a pagan rule.
Without the Church's army and money europe wouldn't be liberated. Catholics from everywhere in europe went to Spain to fight against the muslims. They didn't have anything common with each other other than their religion
Without the help of eastern Catholic europeans, Spain would still be muslim today. That fact only proves their unity had (primarily) a religion motivation

Doos boolt, the Catholic Church is our last standing bastion against the invasion of Europe by mostly Islamic foreigners.

Also, there is no such thing as universalism in the Church.#Based christian Nigerians are not considered more akin to their own instead of their atheist/pagan members of their own blood.

No such thing! We must retake Jerusalem, we must retake some irrelevant desert city while French, Brits and Germans are killed in the streets!

>When muslims conquered the region of what is today Spain it was under a pagan rule.
Close this bookmark right now, then read wikipedia, than read history 101. I have nothing more to say to you.

>After 500 years of destroying tradition Francis is now to blame for the european fetish with arabs and africans
If anything Francis is the result of the 500 year anti-traditionalist culture

>Then read wikipedia
yeah but even in wikipedia it's a well known fact 6th and 7th century Espania was a pagan society.
the Visigothic Kingdon wasn't Christian and the kings weren't Catholics

>If anything Francis is the result of the 500 year anti-traditionalist culture
If anything, it shows that Christian society is powerless to even maintain its' own, not to mention "protecting" something else.

>yeah but even in wikipedia it's a well known fact 6th and 7th century Espania was a pagan society.
>the Visigothic Kingdon wasn't Christian and the kings weren't Catholics

Hispania was literally 100% Catholic Christian when the first Muslim footman set his manfoot on its' shore, you ignorant hypocritical idiot.

well when you have a bunch of people willing to betray and kill each other there is no amount of Christianism that will prevent this from happening
No culture can protect itself forever. 1 single Bishop is already enough to corrupt thousands of people. Now imagine hundreds of priests. Now imagine hundreds of priests, bishops and a great amount of lunatic locals

>Without the Catholic Church europe is nothing but a provider of sex slaves to muslims. In Sweden and Germany there are many pagan white boys already learning how to please muslims sexually

The Catholic Church is little better than your average madrassa except in the past 200 years. Your "god" is as false as the "god" of the Muslims.

Had you not betrayed the Empire we wouldn't have to worry about Muslims and pagans would be real pagans with armies, law and order, and honor for science and technology. We wouldn't have to waste time debating whether or not a terrorist manual which has been repeatedly disproved is legitimate.

youtube.com/watch?v=VTrMpWb7JSI

>Hispania was literally 100% Catholic Christian when the first Muslim footman set his manfoot on its' shore
That's a lie and you know it's a lie. In the 6th century was a seat of Arians (the heretics), and in the century later they combined pagan roman law with Christian morals but the kings didn't convert and they didn't have the approval of the Pope.
At the same time in France things were different. Pepin the Short was a Catholic and he succeeded expelling muslims, unlike the Visigoths.

>well when you have a bunch of people willing to betray and kill each other there is no amount of Christianism that will prevent this from happening
No culture can protect itself forever. 1 single Bishop is already enough to corrupt thousands of people. Now imagine hundreds of priests. Now imagine hundreds of priests, bishops and a great amount of lunatic locals
Ok then, Christianity is useless shit that fails to safeguard a healthy society in your own words. Let's try something that actually works, I don't know, Islam or Confucianism perhaps, or maybe something entirely new.

>or maybe something entirely new.
You have something new every 100 years.
Protestantism, illuminism, bolshevism, socialism, social-democracy, constitutional monarchy, absolutism, republicanism... if you want something fresh and new you already got it

No true Scotsman argument. Classic.

>Protestantism, illuminism, bolshevism, socialism, social-democracy, constitutional monarchy, absolutism, republicanism... if you want something fresh and new you already got it
Well, they do result in some competent and productive societies, unlike Christianity, apparently, so by all means!

Not true what? Even if you call them arians it's a lie because they weren't arians in the 7th century but in the previous century.
The kings weren't Catholics. Find me the equivalent of Clovis I in the Visigoth kingdom.

There you go, then you already have your ''something new'' which produces great results and result in competent and productive societies.

>The kings weren't Catholics. Find me the equivalent of Clovis I in the Visigoth kingdom.

>Reccared I (or Recared; Latin: Reccaredus; Gothic: RekkareÞ; Spanish: Recaredo; c. 559 – 31 May 601 AD; reigned 586–601) was Visigothic King of Hispania and Septimania. His reign marked a climactic shift in history, with the king's renunciation of Arianism in favour of Catholicism in 587.
And more or less everybody after.

>There you go, then you already have your ''something new'' which produces great results and result in competent and productive societies.
Duh, but you autistically cling to some odd form of Catholic romanticism, despite a clear evidence in history that it does not produce any results apart from falling on its' face in modern environment.

>587
but the kings after him weren't Catholics or arians, and the muslim invasion started in early 7th century. Liuva II, his son, lost the battle to arians and the kingdom returned to a pagan republic

As I said, when the people inside rebel against Catholicism, when the priests, bishops and monarchs betray themselves nothing can be done. If the Catholic Church didn't suceed in the civilization of pagans you can hope in the future muslims will at least upgrade europe's morality but I doubt they will succeed and I doubt they have the desire to do so

>but the kings after him weren't Catholics or arians
Like, honestly, what are you talking about?
His son was murdered in Arian Rebellion. The rebellion was soon crushed by Catholics and a new Catholic king was elected.

>new Catholic king was elected.
Who? Witteric? there wasn't a Catholic kingdom there. You had 1 or 2 years of some king who converted to Catholicism and either converted to arianism or was destroyed by promoters of the republic. They weren't united like the franks, which is way it was easier for muslims to conquer

Obligatory post

>source 1
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teutonic_Order
?
I can't find the ''Frequently killed Catholic poles'' information there. What's the source?

As the Jews have added to their other crimes this that they endeavoured to overthrow the country and the people, they must be severely punished. They have done this after they had (in appearance) received baptism, which, however, by faithlessness they have again stained. They shall be deprived of their property for the benefit of the exchequer, and shall be made slaves forever. Those to whom the King sends them as slaves must watch that they may no longer practise Jewish usages, and their children must be separated from them, when they are seven years of age, and subsequently married with Christians.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seventeenth_Council_of_Toledo

>"Without the Catholic Church europe is nothing but a provider of sex slaves to muslims"
>ransacked the greatest christian bastion in the world and open the gates to muslim conquest
that's like starting a fire in your house and then claiming you are the bigger man for trying to put it out

>all of the sources are wikipedia

>Spain would be Muslim without Castilla*
Fixed that for you, historical brainlet.
Once you understand that Catholiscism was the false pretention used by the kingdom to unite the other kingdoms under one flag you may post again.
Had it been the church, the rest of Europe would have formally partaken in the proccess, but that wasn't the case.

The irony of europe is that the tribes who destroyed the roman empire also destroyed the Catholic Church and to this day they think their greatest achievement was the french revolution and free market capitalism
Greece and other small countries now totally helpless and heading towards extinction will never experience again being helped by people other than german-jewish banks

>Baltic and Saxon pagans
>true Europeans
Does the autist that made this know that pagans constantly raided Christian lands? Or that baltic tribes that converted and/or stopped raiding were treated pretty well by the church?

>Christian lands

Oh yes, those ancient Christian lands of Europe. The Pagans just showed up one day and started attacking ancient Christian European lands and destroying the ancient Christian Chur... OH WAIT!

Except that islam is a spawn of christianism.
No christianism = no islam = no problem.

>Christcucks, Mudslimes will never understand the feeling of having their own native religion.

All lands belongs to God, heathen.

>All lands belongs to God
Of Israel

>Does the autist that made this know that pagans constantly raided Christian lands?

Don't know about Saxons, but Poles started their shit with Old Prussians and when they couldn't handle them on their own called Teutonic Order on them and Lithuanian/Latvian/Estonians tribes only fought among themselves or in case of Lithuania they attacked Rus lands but, Teutonic Order didn't view Orthodox Christians much better than the pagans and it's not like they didn't do raids either.

>Wulfstan of Hedeby, an agent of Alfred of Wessex, recorded the seafaring and cattle-herding Prussians as a strong and independent nation.[1] Mieszko I of the Polans tried to extend his realm from land he had just conquered around the mouth of the Oder as far as Prussia.[2] Boleslaw I of Poland, son of Mieszko I, greatly expanded his land conquests and used Adalbert of Prague for his aim of conquering the Prussians in 997, but the missionary was killed by the pagans. After some initial success among the Prussians, Adalbert's successor, Bruno of Querfurt, was also killed in 1009.[3] Boleslaw I continued his conquests of surrounding lands and in 1015 he devastated large parts of Prussia.

>The Poles waged war with the neighboring Prussians, Sudovians, and Wends over the following two centuries.[4][5][6] While the Poles sought the conversion of the Prussians and control of their land, the Prussians engaged in lucrative raids for slaves in the bordering territories of Chełmno Land and Masovia.[7] Many Prussians nominally accepted baptism only to revert to pagan beliefs after hostilities ended. Henry of Sandomierz was killed fighting the Prussians in 1166.[8] Boleslaw IV and Casimir II each led large armies into Prussia; while Boleslaw's forces were defeated in guerilla warfare, Casimir imposed peace until his death in 1194.[9] King Valdemar II of Denmark supported Danish expeditions against Samland until his capture by Henry, Count of Schwerin, in 1223.

Yes, the one true God.

>t.

>Without the Catholic Church europe is nothing but a provider of sex slaves to muslims. In Sweden and Germany there are many pagan white boys already learning how to please muslims sexually
Wut. Are you a paranoid schizophrenic or something?

Nice lies shlomo

Catholic church cant do anything dude

what is Indian conflicts with Muslims?

Why were polytheist so peaceful? Why didnt they kill people who didnt believe their fanfiction?