How am I supposed to measure the calories in a fruit salad?
It has:
>kiwi
>pineapple
>watermelon
>melon
>blueberries
>honeydew
And the whole container is about 1.1 lbs. I tried estimating, but getting only about 500 calories. That seems a bit on the low end.
Do I have any alternatives other than disassembling it and weighing it component by component? I really don't want to do that because autism.
>eats fruit salad
never going to make it
you definitely should disassemble it, weigh every single piece of fruit, put it into myfitnesspal, and do that for the rest of your life for everything
>fishing out the beef from the pho, the noodles, measuring broth in ml
>picking out each last gram of goat cheese from a salad
>trying to find out the cals you ate licking the top of a yogurt container
It's delicious and healthy and has better vitamin absorption rate than chewable vitamins.
So what you're saying is I should embrace the Veeky Forums-autism?
Probably around 50-70 kcal per 100g. Fruit vary in calories like crazy anyway depending on how sweet they end up.
Seems kind of pointless. I mean I hope you realize that the calorie data for fresh produce is just a median or average value and that there is a bit of variety anyway, depending on cultivar, growing conditions etc. The vast majority of fruits are 50-70 with an average of 60 calories per 100 grams in a balanced mix, exceptions being bananas with 80-90 calories/100g.
1.1 lbs is 500 grams, that's less than 500 calories in 100% of cases. It's more like 300 calories (unless there is added sugar, I don't know if you're talking about fresh produce or a mystery can you found).
300 calories? cmon op i don't want to hear you only eat one a day, 4 salads 2-3 times a day op cmon
Why the fuck would you eat fructose, retard?
health.harvard.edu
That article literally says you shouldn't give up fruit, you gurgling moron. It's in the last paragraph you fucking retard.
Veeky Forums's anxiety about eating fruit is hilarious
eat a grapefruit you dysfunctional weirdos
It's not true just because it's from Harvard. Harvard is home to David Ludwig, who is a major anti-carb anti-sugar pro-fat shill and has significant influence on the content they put out there.
The article is wrong either way because refined sugar does not cause any of the things it claims it does. It doesn't list any references anyway, so it can be discarded. When you put people on an isocaloric (!) high-sugar diet and they don't gain weight, nothing changes at all. Whatever negative effects people find in relation to sugar is due to weight gain or some other dietary factor. Whatever negative effect people find in relation to fructose is not reality-based (most studies give people pure liquid fructose at a dose higher than what anybody consumes in an entire day, and nobody even consumes pure liquid fructose anyway)
fruit is for grills and betas.
>willingly eating a bowl of sugary carbs
The momscience is real
Looks like Beth went a little hard on the fructose herself, high kek. I always take my diet advice from overweight moms
i agree i recently eat only the fruits from fresh market and have lost the ten pounds maybe more I can't tell my ungrateful osychopath daughteer stole over 180,000 dollars from comined income in last three months from me. the ruits are full of the vitamins for my hair skin nails. must not need more.
>le carbs le are le bad
When will this meme die?
Did you just link me an article from a website called 'dAily burn'. Are you a fat middle aged soccer mom?
Exactly when the more protein = always good meme dies
Fruit has a lot of micros, its not that calorie dense and it kills the cravings for sweet stuff when you're cutting. If it fits your macros there's literally nothing wrong with eating fruit