How do I get into the philosophy of skepticism?

How do I get into the philosophy of skepticism?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/dCvyg679bsg
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Proposition_187
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

You need to deprive your brain of oxygen for about five minutes.

>u can't no nuffin
There, the summary.

Suck a few dicks

This image makes me mad. Really, mad.

Read anything from the actual horsemen. If you are illitterate then check out any of their conferance interviews and lectures.
Dawkins, Harris and Hitchens people who spent actual time doing their stuff, no bloggers or christcucks.

stick a banana up your arse and be a faggot tbH

Sargon isn't a "Skeptic" anyways. He's a blatant Trump conservative. He supported La Pen, has never criticized Trump ever, has never criticized the right ever, while only bitching about the left. At least the other three (who are all faggots in their own ways) are willing to abide by the skeptic name and criticize both sides.
Sargon only claims to be (((classically liberal))) to garner supporters from the left. Like Rubin, he doesn't actually abide by any of the tenets of (((classical liberalism))) that aren't just normie conservative opinions.

>compares the marian reforms to Trumps election
>later compares Trump to Ceasar
>starts a history channel with history channel, hardcore history and history of rome podcast as a source

How can anyone take this dumb fuck seriously?

>>compared Marius and Caesar to Trump
Please tell me he didn't do this

>thunder "I take things out of context" f00t

>you can't be a skeptic unless you screech against the greatest world leader in 125 years

Didn't he post black porn on twitter to stop Nazis from associating him with them?

I like how /pol/ hates Sargon for being "too liberal" while Veeky Forums hates him for being "too conservative".

Is this sarcasm?
/pol/ thinks anyone who isn't an unironic Nazi is too liberal

Which is even funnier since actual stormfags, as actual literal Neo-Nazis complain that /pol/ itself is too liberal and pro-Zionist.

youtu.be/dCvyg679bsg

Don't believe anything.

>that video
>those comments
Oh dear god

>pro-gay
>pro-universal healthcare
>pro-welfare
>BUT HE HATES FEMINISTS SO HE'S A RIGHTIST REEEE

The latter two he's definitely not anymore, considering who he has supported the past couple years.
He's pro-gay because you can't be a successful Youtuber otherwise.

He's supported Trump because of immigration, and anti-immigration should really be the leftist position if most leftists weren't useful idiots for megacorporations and utterly cucked by liberals

He supported La Pen because of immigration too?
And you do realize Trump runs a megacorp too, right?

>Le Pen because of immigration
Yes?

>everyone who isn't a communist faggot isn't really left wing!

Who are you quoting?

>Veeky Forums hates him for being "too conservative".
I have no idea who that is.
Stop pretending that Veeky Forums is a leftist board.

>he doesn't actually abide by any of the tenets of (((classical liberalism))) that aren't just normie conservative opinions.
That's because normie conserviatve opinions are classical liberalism. Reminder that America's political lexicon is screwed up and when they say conservativeism,they mean liberalism. When they say liberalism, they mean progressivism.

>pro-gay
More like diet pro-gay, nearly every time he approaches a LGBT issue he acts like they are asking too much "you got your rights, lol there is like nothing more hindering your group in todays society lmao." And when people give him shit not sticking to his principles he goes on a 'all my friends are gay' tirade and pretends to be the victim of SJW slander.

Is he wrong? Faggots should be lucky we don't execute every single one of them, they should be grateful to be living.

And all three of them are extremely wrong and ought to read nietzsche again.

And Dennett isnt much better.

This, but unironically.

As a genuine fag I kind of agree. Same with blacks/women, give them equal rights and have the gov butt out of shit unless its genuine violence honestly
But then again im a fucking lolbertarian meme

he thinks Hayek was right and Keynes was wrong
any identification with the left, especially in a British context, is sorely mistaken

Trump runs a megacorp and is hated by all other megacorps because restricting immigration and preventing liberals and their corporate overlords from turning the average working man into a underpaid disposable tool with no rights makes you literally Hitler.

Since when did Trump run a megacorp? He runs closely held hospitality and lifestyle branding corps, much like Oprah or Martha Stewart.

He's against the big time billionaires (people with 10 billion+ with seats on multiple billion dollar corporate boards who depend on immigrant labor).

>tfw I can't go back to 2007 when I was 10 years old and laughing at the thunderf00t v. VenomFangX debates
Everything was so simple back then

The easiest introduction is probably The Demon Haunted World by Carl Sagan.

The key thing to know about skepticism as a philosophical moment is that it's basically built around the idea of holding claims to standards of evidence. It's not just about rejecting anything you don't like the sound of to be edgy, which is where almost every youtube "skeptic" it wrong, especially idiots like Sargon.

It's true, still an extremely rich man hated by 99% of the rest of the rich.

>That pic

u just posted a frok tho

But then you know that you know nothing which is a position contradictory to the skeptics. Skepticism is a meta-epistemological position, not an epistemological.

Sceptic =/= skeptic

>Trump
>against the billionaires

The fuck is this meme, did you guys pay attention to his cabinet appointments at all? Or the latest tax "reform" bill? Or what he's doing with the consumer protection bureau? It's like you guys live in an alternate reality. Trump is GOP as GOP can be. And immigration has been a GOP dogwhistle for decades. Trump just pushed the "build a wall" meme.

>And immigration has been a GOP dogwhistle for decades.
Can I get sources on this? I know that the GOP took a hard line against immigration in California and got crushed by the latin vote there, but latins had been roughly split between parties before that, and I find it hard to believe that the Republicans have been against immigrants for such a long time.

>Thundercuck
i unsubbed when he started posting bullshit

California took a hard line against immigration and it was overruled.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Proposition_187

>what is Reagan granting amnesty to illegals?
Republicans have been trying to pander to Hispanics for decades.

Yes, but I'm saying that the GOP campaigned for it and got rekt by the latinos there after the 90's

S-Shut up l-libtard

just know that everyone is wrong except for you

you can't
>irony

Yes ha ha
And his own butt too!
That outta show them haha