Who was in the wrong here?

Who was in the wrong here?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salomon_James_de_Rothschild
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judah_P._Benjamin
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Levy_Yulee
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_M._Hyams
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Grey rural and suburban retards who later voted DRUMPF

The Confederacy and their bunch of wannabee Aristocrats who couldn't get with the program

>mfw slavery was supposed to be abolished in from the start and the US could've been free of the moral stain and eternal 5th Column in the form of niggers

The CSA couldn't handle democracy.

Didn't they vote to succeed?

The CSA was fighting for a bad cause, but secession should be allowed.

CSA, but not for
>muh slavery
>muh secession
Weakening America was a British game and they tried using the CSA as a means to that end

>Succeed
You can't vote for that

Do you really have to (((ask)))?

Whoever lost, as always

why?

Because the federal government doesn't have the right to keep people who want nothing to do with it as part of it.
Unless you're a might-makes-right faggot.

>Succeed
>You can't vote for that

So what are you saying that the Union couldn't handle Democracy?

>The South should have been allowed to leave because of muh democracy, but having a slave economy is fine.

...

No, you wrote "succeed" instead of "secede" two very different words. If you could magically vote for success we wouldn't have politicians

Well we're living in the timeline where the Holocaust happened and Anne Frank died so the answer is pretty obvious...

Agreed

>but secession should be allowed.
It is. The exact method of doing so hasn't been decided on, but Texas v. White made it clear that secession is allowed based on "consent of the states". The CSA just did it in an idiotic way and almost immediately opened up hostilities against the Union.
>people who want nothing to do with it as part of it
There was arguably more popular support for the Union in the states that seceded than for their own new governments. At the very least the southern states should have held a plebiscite, if they wanted to make their illegal move look more like the "will of the people" instead of a blatantly unilateral decision by a landed aristocracy.

I think you replied to the wrong person, lad

>he thinks the average southerner didn't support johnny reb

How dumb can you be?

Not him but it took an intense propaganda effort to convince Southerners to hate the Union

Yeah, meant for clearly.
Look up Unionism and the movements they made during the war.

Who did the Jews back in the Civil War?

>A letter addressed to South Carolina's delegation at the Congress by the Jews of Charleston requested that the new national flag not contain a sectarian emblem.
Interesting that the Jews through a single letter of protest were able to remove one of the front runners in the contest for the confederate flag.

The Jews were right to complain desu, that flag design is garbage. Also the Battle Flag is truly unique, one of the most recognizable flags in the world.

they should've kept that one as the national flag and called it the "blood-stained banner" instead of the actual one

Um isn't that pretty similar to slavery?

Whichever side of the Mason-Dixon they lived in?

Secession is allowed. You just have to convince Congress to agree for the state to leave the union and then do a slow transition out.

Doing we "WE IS INDEPENDENT NOWZ" is retarded and isn't legally right.

This

Bingo

Jews supported the Confederacy.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salomon_James_de_Rothschild
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judah_P._Benjamin
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Levy_Yulee
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_M._Hyams

>caring about some Enlightenment spook "moral stain"
>caring what niggers think
>forcing literally half your nation into a republic that operates against their economic and cultural self-interest and expecting them to like it and not try to change it

Nah I prefer the original blood stained banner

The Union of course

the confederacy since most jews were prominent slave owners