Why do people think the Tarim mummies are "Nordic Aryans" or some shit? This one for example looks clearly part Asian...

Why do people think the Tarim mummies are "Nordic Aryans" or some shit? This one for example looks clearly part Asian, just look at the cheekbones. They were already mixed just like their modern descendants in Xinjiang (Uyghur people).

Other urls found in this thread:

genetiker.wordpress.com/
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Because literally all of civilization derives from proto Germanics.

She looks Finnish in my eyes

Nordics are known to have high cheekbones as well.

>proto Germanics.
Retard

>They were already mixed just like their modern descendants in Xinjiang (Uyghur people).
they werent, some of them got mongoloid genes when mongoloids conquered in 100 BC

>Nordics

*Finns

And it's because they have 10% Siberian admixture.

>Dingling
How the fuck does China expect us to take this crap seriously?
This is why people like Rome

Proto germanics are cimbri

Scandinavians have 1/5 as much Siberian admixture as Finns

Because of genetic research? No one calls them Nordic Aryans, well not anyone with proficiency, but it is agreed upon that were Indo-European, at very least closely related.
Unless you are Turk, like wuzzing Ughurs is the sole reason I want China to genocide them like they genocided the Dzungar.
> worried at the prospect that they are descendants of migrants into Xinjiang and could be seen as invaders and not the indigenous inhabitants, have sought to revise history like Turghun Almas in his book Uyghurlar, claiming that Turkic Uyghurs were always natives of Xinjiang, claiming that the Tocharian Tarim mummies were Uyghurs, claiming Uyghurs invented gunpowder, paper, compass, printing, and that Uyghur civilization is 6,000 years old and is the origin of all world civilization.

What the fuck are you talking about you dense retard.

There's no substantial genetic research on them besides shitty haplogroup testing. They tested 12 mummies and found them to belong to haplo Y haplo R1a and some had East Asian mtDNA like B5, D and G2a. Nothing very conclusive, but it already indicates they were somewhat mixed.

Because they think all Indo-Europeans are those with blonde hair, blue eyes, and pale skin.

Cimbri was a tribe,but he's still wrong.

That is a black que- fuck it I can't even do this right now.

One of the males was K*

Oh, I thought you're the guy from "THEY WAZ PROTO GERMANIC" Sorry.

Why do people think blonde = Germanic? There's plenty of people who are blonde and not Germanic (Finns, Estonians, Russians, Poles, Northern Italians, etc)

>There's no substantial genetic research on them besides shitty haplogroup testing.
>There's no evidence as long as you disregard all of the evidence
You brainlets are the worst, and unfortunately there is more and more of you lately on Veeky Forums. Where did you come from? Reddit? Go back there.

>Finns and Estonians

Part Germanic

>Russians

Not a real ethnicity

>Poles

Part German but swarthy

>Northern Italians

Celto-Germanic but swarthy

t. fingoloid khang with yellow fetish

Is the reddit spacing a part of your shtick or do you just do it subconsciously

>haplogroups tell everything about your ancestry

Go scrub a toilet Poleshit


I do it to establish dominance over autists like you

Here, use it. It will get better.

Did you find that in the toilet Poleshit?

I didn't think you're a pad kind of guy. Here.

>/int/ trash leaks again
Go back to your designated shitting board you literal niggers, stop polluting my Veeky Forums

Polacks are the pollution though

Cool, go tell /int/ about it. Nobody wants you hare.

Obsessed.

Not them, but it's pretty obvious that this is a bait thread for Nordicists, so it's not like this level of shitflinging is any different to the "discussion" that we would have on topic.

No they don’t, the ”East Asian” component in Finns includes ANE which inflates it tenfold.
Scandinavians have no Siberian admixture and the ones that do are Saamic Mongoloids, not ethnic Scandinavians.

There’s an undeniable link with Indo-Europeans and the spread of these traits though, no matter how much that upsets some people.

True that but these light traits reached a maximum in Germanic and Finnic peoples specifically.
Lithuanians are much more darker haired despite being technically slightly more PIE descended than Finnics and Germanics.

According to Basal K7 data from Eurogenes they are indeed up to 7% EEA, sorry Pekka.

I can think of 3 Poles shitting up Veeky Forums

Two of them hate Germanics or Western Europeans(one of which loves to make cuckold porn compilations about Western European women with African men, other one is a Sarmatianist) while the third one believes Poles to be Nordic and ends up arguing with the Sarmatianist


That's a lot of shitposting from those 3

Diversity
is
our
strength.

The first guy you mentioned is by far the worst, he's on here literally all the time from what I can tell and never shuts up about Germans.

Why do you want to make Veeky Forums your safe space, you g*Rmanoid wh*Te subhuman.

The ones who did that test were either Saamic mongrels or your calculator is shit

Finns are 5% Saami on average but also >7% Siberian on top of that.


Date 62,2622547587 generations 1556,5563689681 years
Saami 0,0526040785
Nganasan 0,0737074701
Eastern_Baltic_Finnic 0,1736884513
Baltic 0,0517192343
South_Baltic_Finnic 0,2280129884
Scandinavian 0,3602677772

The Dingling were Turkic, not Chinese. They were part of the Xiongnu, Xianbei, and later migrated to Europe, and were a part of the European-Huns

>dingling (ting ling)

I think we have DNA from them if I remember right thry were EHG+CHG+mongoloid? Did they have anatolian farmer?

>ANE
ANE was pre-kostenki west eurasian (not sure if it can be consider proto-caucasoid at that point) mixed with paleolithic east/south/southeast asian.

Sungir which had ~10% more WHG admixture/drift than Kostenki looked like this:

Basically like a modern australoid/negrito admixed southeast asian mongoloid.

...

>Nordic means people from Northern Europe
>People in Central Asia are Nordic.

Keep in mind gravettians/aurigancians show much more australoid than mongoloid but phenotype looks semi-mongoloid.

genetiker.wordpress.com/

5000 years wasn't enough to get rid of the tropical phenotype

>Scandinavians have no Siberian admixture

100% of modern Europeans have Siberian admixture. Including Sardinians and Cypriots even.

Newest theory is that east and west eurasians may have split up to 60,000-80,000 years ago and basal eurasians must have split even earlier so human may have left africa ~100,000 or even earlier.

Jewish lies!
Mongoloid admixture then, if it soothes your autism.

>60,000-80,000 years ago

Y-DNA(IJK, Japanese-Aurignacian C) says 45-50k.

It's true that that there was an admixture event some 15000 years later but still at this point East Eurasians and West Eurasians(xBasal Eurasian) were effectively a homogenic race who looked more or less the same.

>Mongoloid admixture then, if it soothes your autism.
Not clear if paleolithic europeans had any real mongoloid admixture. They show like 10-15% in ADMIXTURE but may be shared leftover alleles from common ancestors or something without close modern equivalent extrapolated as east asian by algorithm. Anyway they show much more australoid than monglid in admixture so it's surprising they looked so mongoloid. This means caucasoid phenotype is probably a mesolithic phenomena. WHG already looked fully caucasoid and we don't know if pure Basal eurasian looked caucasoid (probably looked semi-caucasoid at least).

They're Eurasian, and more Euro than people who've live in the area since the Mongol invasion

...

>since the Mongol invasion
More like chink invasion.

...

...

>australoid admixture
>10-15% mongoloid admixture
sounds like horseshit desu

>genetiker.wordpress.com/

>Y-DNA(IJK, Japanese-Aurignacian C) says 45-50k.
I'm not talknig about haplograoups.

>a fucking corpse has slanted eyes and prominent cheeks
WOW

ANE are Bros of Nordica, they weren't mongs

>wordpress.com

Regardless of whatever it is that you think you're talking about they set a hard upper limit of the Eurasian(xBasal Eurasian) genetic divergence.

Nearly half mongoloid and Malt'a was also ~10% ASI.

100% Nordic. These are normal, White cheek bones, the skin is just at bad condition

Newest theory that it split over 80,000 years ago but based on neolithic moroccan genomes it;'s possible there was a para-eurasian lineage that split even earlier. Natufians and especially Morocco_IAM and Morocco_KAD seem to have admixture from both basal and para-eurasians. IAM seems to have no west eurasian ancestry.

Overall, her skull shape resembles the EHG crania from Russia.

What does Morocco have to do with the divergence of East and West Eurasians somewhere around Iran/India/Central Asia 50000 years ago?

It's likely she was more mongoloid admixed than EHG.

She was obviously not, or at least didn't show any mongoloid tendencies in race.

Cheekbones suggest east asian/lake baikal/tungid admixture(Devil's Gate specimens didn't have prominent cheekbones)

Neolithic north african had the most basal eurasian ancestry found so far.
Maybe when we manage to sequence Imesolithic Iberomaurusian it will be even more basal,

>Veeky Forums anthropologist expert on race by skull
This
even Adolf and Clinton have Mongold skull shape

Jebel-Irhoud could be proto-para/basal eurasian but it's probably too old to recover any DNA from it.

She didn't have prominent cheek bones, it's just a bad contition of her skin making them look prominent.

Overall, fits the Proto-Nordic definition.

Adolf Hitler had more of middle eastern/basal skull shape.

Hitler was of mixed Nordic and Alpinid race, nothing "mongoloid" about him.

Nordic in genral is mongoloid influenced phenotype. It's likely toacharians were significantly chink admixed.

Shoot up. I'm expert in Mongol skulls

So where his E1b1b came from?

>Nordic in genral is mongoloid influenced phenotype
lol?

neolithic medshit migrations

Yes, Adolf was Turkish. So were tocharians. Every white person is mongoloid

It's basically caused by high EHG(which was east asian and amerindian admixed and mostly ANE)+CHG(ANE+Basal+Amerindian)+ additional Siberian admixture.

>E1b1b
Basal or Semi-Eurasians.

>create your civilization
>medshits
Your Nordic faggots did literally nothing. No agriculture, no art, no civilization, no achievements.

It's baffling why you're so obsessed with Tocharians considering all they did was getting raped by all their neighbors.

>create your civilization
Wrong. All the Indo-European speaking migrations were created by the Nordic man.

>EHG(which was east asian and amerindian admixed and mostly ANE)
No

>Indo-European speaking migrations
*civilizations

>did nothing
indo-europeans created your civilizations, m*Doid
stop appropriating indo-european civilization

>Every white person is mongoloid
All modern Europeans and Middle Easterners have both Basal Eurasian AND Basal Siberian and Basal East Asian admixtures and in many cases modern east asian. amerindian, and siberian admixtures also.

They were created by mixing and being influenced by non-IE people. Outside of South Europe your Nordics produced nothing of value.

Yes. EHG was ~75% ANE and also had modern east asian/siberian/amerindian admixtures not present on the original ANE. Including EDAR.

>They were created by mixing and being influenced by non-IE people
Nope, they were created by the NORDIC man. If you a medshit, and you speak an Indo-European language, you are a cuck. Without Nordics there would not be Roman and Greek civilizations, as well as the Persian and Indian. You medshit mokeys are pathetic. "HURR DURR WE WUZ CIVILIZATION EVEN THOUGH OUR ENTIRE CULTURE AND LANGUAGE WAS GIVEN TO US BY NORDICS... NORDKUKCS BTFO1!!1111".

>Wrong. All the Indo-European speaking migrations were created by the Nordic man.

Indo-Europeans were siberian/caucasian/iranian mongrels.

>Outside of South Europe your Nordics produced nothing of value
How did Indo-Europeans come to dominate the world, then? They didn't come from Southern Europe as far as I know.