Why did wh*Te subhumans turn Roman Britain into ancient Detroit...

Why did wh*Te subhumans turn Roman Britain into ancient Detroit? Did they destroy all the architecture and infrastructure on purpose like the subhumans they are?

It turned out ok I think.

...

Why? Cause barbarians don't GIVE A FUCK OP.
They'd probably nail your ass to a tree while you're whining about subhumans and shit.

romans ain't give them enough denarius for they programs.

They dismantled the buildings in order to create their own, yes. It is much easier to dismantle and reuse perfectly good milled, masoned, and balanced materials instead of having to do this all on their own.
As for why they created medieval Detroit, it was becausw when the Romans left or died out, they took their skilled craftsmen and techniques with them. Its not a question of why the inhabitants of england did it, but more of a when and how long did it take for Rome's remnants to be torn apart and reused?

The why question is kind of boring to ask and very simple to undsrstand if you think about it. What would happen if all of the sudden that sophisticated civilisation jist up nd left with no sign of coming back? Well the obvious answer is look at history.

How it happened would be way more interesting. What did tbe first guy to walk through the Roman ghost town do? Did he check every house? Did he lay in an actual bed? Did he drink some of the lef over wine and dance on top of a marble table imported from Italy? Or did he simply just take a giant shit in the middle of the public bath nd leave, never to come back, taking nothing and leaving it all.

The collapse of Roman infrastructure in Britain had already begun by the time the Anglo-Saxons took control desu. During the migration period cities and towns all over the empire suffered, they were the perfect target for roaming armies and thus they became completely depopulated either from famine, sacking or just the populace fleeing to the countryside (particularly aristocrats moving to their villas). The collapse of the Empire in the West also had an adverse effect on trade especially on Britain that was cut off from Rome fairly quickly once Gaul fell. I'm pretty sure the numerous cities in Gaul were reliant on food from Britain and so once the cities there were depopulated the economy of Britain kinda crashed.


I'd also like to point out that the more popular/modern theory relating to Anglo-Saxons is that they didn't invade but that they were invited to Britain to fight the Irish and Picts as Foederati until they simply usurped the local Governments after the Romans became too reliant on them.

That's a greek.

>this niglet thinks that was Britannia under Rome

they preferred their way of life, so they lived in their own form of housing. They weren't fond of towns or cities

people here don't really want to discuss history and OP isn't really asking a question, he's actually expressing his opinion passively.

>What did tbe first guy to walk through the Roman ghost town do?
What makes you think that any such ghost towns would exists? The population of roman britain didn't just pack their bags and tagged along with the soldiers back to the continent. The few that left would have likely sold their immovable property and if they for some reason didn't then their house would've eventually been occupied by squatters if it wasn't torn apart to make new things out of its building blocks.
When the invading germanic tribes took over the island they would obviously build houses in their own way, based on practices and designs they were familliar with, slowly turning the once roman cities into germanic ones.

Why did you redo this when a perfectly good one existed of Caesar

pls post

user it’s not a new view, it’s just the late romanrist view, much like how the Germanic were actually very civilised and used roman equipment

How much of a genetic impact did the Anglo-Saxons have on England? Are modern Englishmen more celtic or anglo-saxon?

Roman Empire was Nordic. Anglo-Saxons didn't build pools and stuff because they didn't need it (were stronger people than degenerated Romans, but of the same Nordic Race).

English are predominantly Anglo-Saxon. Welsh, Scottish, Irish, Cornish, et cetera are predominantly Celtic.

It was not because they were subhumans. The climate changed reducing grain production. Further society became more decentralized and trade broke down, most Anglo-Saxon nobles lived on their land and the middle class and skilled artisans were spread out rather than concentrated in large cities. The populations of cities dropped and there was no need to maintain such large buildings.

Honestly anglo saxon one looks really comfy.

Depends where
My family are from the south east and we're all blonde hair and blue eyed.

Yeah, it's kind of comforting to think the end of the world with savages living among decaying buildings and shit already happened 1500 years ago.

Wh*tes are unable to produce and sustain a civilization, they always needed Greeks and Italians to do so.

I like the snownigger in the other version better tho.

Romans were BLACK

...