ITT: Underrated Veeky Forums related songs

>bigoted
Bahahahaha they actually keep using this

think again sunshine

"DO IT AGAIN HITLER" ON THIS PICTURE

>fucking NAZI GERMANY wasn't bigoted towards certain races and religions
Holy FUCK. GO BACK

>>>/stormfront/

LMAO the pussification,I love the reversal

>Believing all races and religions are theoretically or historically equal

Id say go back,but there's no where for you

>left
>angry working class male

>right
>a fucking effete tranny le classy gentlesir

>skinny beta virgin calling anyone else a pussy
lol

Did I say that? I said Nazi Germany was bigoted which is a fucking fact you deluded stormfag. Or are you saying they didn't dislike Jews and gypsies and cripples?

>middle class nerd who collects NEET bucks speaking about the working class
lol

There's no NEET bucks in my country, try again. Your shitty movie actor only needs a fedora in that picture to be complete.

youtube.com/watch?v=P4lsS4HtCs8

FDJ was better and their songs were more catchy.

So this........... is the power........... of Nazi Germany....................

>Arguing physical persona on an anonymous board

Uh,ok I guess. That's a new level of threatened

>Implying Jews did nothing wrong
>Saucing Wikipedia as we speak

Lmfao

>the more Nordic related the better
>implying

youtube.com/watch?v=RFULSJvKEps

It's basically the same shit. I don't understand why you faggots hate the communists so much.

>implying it's not true
Compare Nordic-ruled Roman Empire and Republic with modern m*dish-ruled Italy.

>lmao DA JOOOOOOOZ
I wish you were born in Germany and got conscripted into the Wehrmacht so you could die in any number of horrible battles that your beloved Nazi Germany caused. Maybe your retarded, edgy teenage angst tune would change after that.
Reported and saged.

...

> I don't understand why you faggots hate the communists so much.
gee i wonder

>his is a natsoc board
>literally created pregnant Anne Frankposting

No. HJ was more disciplined, and more aesthetic, preparing the German youth for the real fight. komsomol and related meme-organizations were lame, very weakly disciplined and preparing innocent children to be slaves of barbaric (((communism))).

>Triggered this hard

They were balts actually,who fought against communist Jews who managed to genocide 250k. The only thing that delayed that was 10k German volunteers who fought against the Soviets in their westward push

Russia has honestly the most Nordics in absolute numbers. Even if just 15% of Russia was Nordic, that's still more people than all of Scandinavia combined.

Those people aren't communists.

>preparing the German youth for the real fight
Why were they so shit then during the last days of WW2?

>HJ was more disciplined
Source?

One thing is certain, there were more homosexuals among them.

you post this as if neo-nazis arent identical retarded trash people. Its just social rejects and retards who either wear a swastika or a hammer and sickle

>Why were they so shit then during the last days of WW2?
They were not. They were actually ones of not many Germans with a will to fight. Many were blinded by (((defetism))) and judeobolshevik propaganda.

>Implying after Rockwell's assassination the entire thing wasn't an op

Also, what happened to history?

Yea, Russia is also a probable urheimat of the Nordic race. Saying that "all Russians are subhuman" is simply incorrect.

>judeobolshevik

lol

>will to fight
brainwashing*

As soldiers they were terrible.

>effeminate
>faggy
>(((open borders supporting)))
VS
>muscles
>""manly"""
>basic bitch, babbys first nationalist ideas

i know skinheads are trash but communists and other left wing people usually support the things that ruin a nation
skinheads on the other hand support ideas that strengthen nations (even tho they're literal thugs and rednecks)

>i-its all controlled op! I swear!
lol. Also, you cant really come here to shill your neo-nazi shit, based entirely on false history, and then compain about a lack of history user.

>national socialists
>honorable men
No.

How can you really deny that the juden were the biggest supporters of communism there?
>As soldiers they were terrible.
They had very bad conditions to fight, including a limited amount of guns, ammo, artillery and tank support.

>skinheads are trash
How exactly are skinheads different from SA other than having a different haircut? They are primarily working class, hardline street thugs, stop being a fedora faggot acting like everyone in the structure of NS Germany was some aristocratic homosexual.

>skinheads on the other hand support ideas that strengthen nations

>looking back on stuff is fake history
its the winners who write the history books

even now, there are new lies being made up about the nazis and people keep falling for them

remember, the ones who usually support natsoc or defend the third riech are also against the status quo and the (((systen)) wich means that they will be underdogs and will never be able to get the same amount of support or facts compared to the ruling elite

>Germans couldn't shoot women on the onset of the invasion
>Soviets were cramming them into bombers and throwing sniper rifle at them

Nazi*

*True

>Implying your half of the story is the only half

You're just picking your favorite victims,that's all. Are you Jewish? I mean if so that's more understandable

>mass murdering women and children and civilians
>honorable
lol. Neo-nazis are all sociopathic retards who think putting on a nice suit makes them civilized.

Like Polish children in Warsaw and yet Warsaw uprising lasted longer.

>killing women
>not honorable
Not even a nazi tbqh.

the SA were the skinheads of the 30s, never denied that
the only thing that was different were the optics and aesthetics (wich actually does a lot)

>yet Warsaw uprising lasted longer.
Completely false. It lasted only 63 days, while defence against Soviet invasion of ethnically German lasted several months.

>posts of picture of something that the enemies caused

>Germans couldn't shoot women on the onset of the invasion
Sure.

I'm talking only about Berlin. It lasted longer than the battle of Berlin.

and how do we know this is real?

>war monger and lead Germany into war
>"i-its not muh fault!" when you end up losing this war

hahaha fucking stormfags.

>i-its not real! day dindu nuffin!

Why wouldn't it be real? It's a pretty famous photo from 1939? How do we know the rape of German women was real? How do we know the Soviet atrocities were real?

The order had to be reversed by kluge during Barbarossa. I like how you ignore captions and memes when we point out things out but you use them too.

>le germany was warmongers meme

Because Poles were more determined than the Germans as a whole. Poles were heavily blinded by London propaganda, which made them die for nothing, while Germans were heavily blinded by defetist propaganda, which made them not fight or fight very weak.

>people calling for a boycott of german goods=a deceleration of war
why do you choose to be retarded user?

>Hey this little girl is bleeding out in the middle of a field bc she was shot by a massive aircraft gun, time to pull out my portable camera and take a close up. Hey sis,pose!

>blinded by German propaganda
No, Poles wanted to fight for their freedom. After the war there were numerous partisan anti-communist organizations fighting against the occupying Soviet forces. There were no such groups in Germany.

Why did you post this as if someone photographic images of war is somehow completely unheard of? Are you actually this stupid user? Do you not know journalist or even just people with cameras take pictures of war? Or are you just so stupid that you think at this time in history, all they had were those big 1800s cameras that took forever to set up?

What were the Officer's Days of Love about?

>No, Poles wanted to fight for their freedom
No, they were sent by London traitors to die for nothing. Quite literally. The only result of the uprising was a destroyed city and thousands of civilians dead because of infighting.

>"calling for a boycott"
no it was quite literally a boycott, that picture makes it sound like the boycott never happend but it was quite widely supported

They wanted to liberate Warsaw themselves. German occupation was extremely brutal and they were tired of waiting and doing nothing.

>why is it odd a wartime cameraman is walking with two girls
>why did he take two girls to a warzone
>why is that warzone an innocuous field with no obvious sign of battle in the background
>why would a German aircraft with limited anti-aircraft ammunition strafe a tiny girl
>why would the cameraman not get help

I don't know user. Seems airtight now that I think about it.

>but it was quite widely supported
Was it? I would like some statistics.

>boycott=a deceleration of war
again, why do you choose to be retarded?

4archive.org/board/his/thread/509405

4archive.org/board/his/thread/509405

4archive.org/board/his/thread/509405

You are avoiding the question by asking very stupid leading questions. This is because youre a witless prole. How did anyone take those girls into a warzone user? They werent taken to one, the nazis made their home into one when they invaded Poland unprevoked. Why are you so stupid?

>why would a German aircraft with limited anti-aircraft ammunition strafe a tiny girl
Apparently they thought it was fun.
spiegel.de/international/germany/rape-murder-and-genocide-nazi-war-crimes-as-described-by-german-soldiers-a-755385.html

>They wanted to liberate Warsaw themselves
They wanted to die for nothing, because it would not change anything if Warsaw was "liberated" by armia krajowa bandits or bolsheviks.

Stupid enough to believe German aircraft used their limited ammo to shoot a little girl in the middle of nowhere instead of an enemy fighter? You realize you aren't being logical, don't you? Germans weren't gunning down civilians for pleasure. Say what you will, but they expected neither theirs nor foreign women to fight. Like I said, the order had to be reversed by Kluge in 41. Prior to that, they wouldn't even shoot at partisans elsewhere if they knew they were women. It's on the books, staged propaganda or not.

>secretly recorded by the Allies

Gee, this sounds like an unbiased font of intel. I'm sure the allies had no motive to concoct anything about their ideological enemies. Next we'll find out what Hitler thought about the Soviets. I'm sure we're in for a surprise there.

You realize Germans weren't logical and part of their work was to spread terror among the locals?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bombing_of_Wieluń
This is how the war started. They bombed civilians.

Same garbage again. Everything is fake of course and Germans did nothing wrong. 5-6 million Polish citizens killed themselves.

"The boycott is the moral substitue for war"

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Nazi_boycott_of_1933

I asked you a simple question. Can you show me the statistics? How much the German economy suffered because of this boycott?

>You realize Germans weren't logical
Yes they were actually.

>spread terror among the locals

Killing small children doesn't spread terror. It spreads dissent. It's counteintuitive to the frame of mind you're referencing. And no, that wasn't the first attack. The first attack was Polish ethnic cleansing of Germans. Or when Poland annexed part of Czech lands. Or when Poland annexed part of Lithuania just prior to the war. Take your pick. Poles were playing the same game equally as ruthlessly.

You have it from the horse's mouth and you still refuse to believe it. You think all 5 million goyim were Poles? Interesting spin. Never heard that one either.

pic for you

>boycott=a deceleration of war
again, why are you so stupid user? even in your own post, notice how it refers to it as a "substitute" user? Do you not know what that word means either?

>"To compel Fascist German to end its campaign of violence and suppression directed against its Jewish minority"
>How dare the jews keep Germany down by not buying from a country that hates them, this is an act of war

Kind of like how we boycotted Japan and imposed sanctions restricting trade so instead of getting their rubber,oil, and aluminum they initiated an invasion for it? Oh, wait.

Seriously I'm interested what your background is. I can't quite peg it.

>The first attack was Polish ethnic cleansing of Germans.
Source?
>Or when Poland annexed part of Lithuania just prior to the war
?

I'm lookin for this order and I can't find it. Kluge order is literally "women in uniform are to be shot". That doesn't mean it was forbidden to kill women before this order was issued. It only means that from now on all women in uniform will be shot.

It was five years before Kristallnacht genius. If anything, this looks like they initiated friction.

Are you retarded? Nazi propaganda was anti-Jewish since the start. After Hitler won, the SA started beating up random Jews on streets.

>an embargo is the same as a boycott
why are you moving the goalpost user?

>he knows he is losing and is already pulling the "YOURE A FUCKING JDIF SHILL" line
lol

>There is evidence that the Nazis, at least during the first two years of their regime, feared that a tight boycott would cripple their economy. Regarding the United States, for example, a memorandum prepared for Hitler by the Economic Policy Department of the Reich as late as November 18, 1938, cited the following comparative figures, which it attributed partly to the boycott:

>Import from the U.S:
1929 = 1,790r
1932 = 592r
1937 = 282r

>Export to the U.S.
1929 = 991r
1932 = 281r
1937 = 209r

according to these numbers i'd say it had some effect

jewishvirtuallibrary.org/anti-nazi-boycotts

>Kluge order is literally "women in uniform are to be shot". That doesn't mean it was forbidden to kill women before this order was issued. It only means that from now on all women in uniform will be shot.

It is dated genius. Notice it says Operation Barbarossa, and immediately before offers a date of June 29th? Yeah, not really that hard. And if they could just then shoot women in uniform, which is a given nowadays or for the Soviets back then, why would you think they would be able to shoot any other woman? I'm seriously interested in how you can defend the indefensible here. Why would you think that self defeating purpose is implied at all?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish–Czechoslovak_border_conflicts

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish–Czechoslovak_War

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish–Lithuanian_War

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1938_Polish_ultimatum_to_Lithuania

Do you know why?

>Only a member of the race can be a citizen. A member of the race can only be one who is of German blood, without consideration of creed. Consequently, no Jew can be a member of the race.
From NSDAP program written in 1920. Why would the Jews support a man who clearly hated them?

>After Hitler won, the SA started beating up random Jews on streets.
just like how jews were persecuted and killed by the millions in russia in the 20's?

>Not selling something to someone because you dont like them raping China means war is justified
>This is the same as someone not buying things from you because they don't like how you treat people like them
>this is an act of war

>they initiated friction
>Kristalnacht was the first action taken by the nazis
>Law for the Restoration of the Professional Civil Service (barring jews from the civil service) is passed weeks after Hitler comes into power
>Friction is somehow not already there
>Jews escalate friction by telling Germany they want the abuse to stop

>From NSDAP program written in 1920. Why would the Jews support a man who clearly hated them?

What are Nuremberg laws. And the Jews didn't belong in Europe, aka Haavara agreement. Germany was shipping them to Israel because they were zionists. So in Bauer's autobiography he talks about escaping Germany. I fell for that when I first read it but it turns out the German government footed the bill. So do you know why Jews were distrusted by that time period?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Jewish_Labor_Bund

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Jewish_Labour_Bund_in_Lithuania,_Poland_and_Russia