How many American men used to fuck their horse during the 19th century?

How many American men used to fuck their horse during the 19th century?

Is that why americans look so weird compared to europeans?

Yes, it's why europoors are so short and have such tiny teeth.

>makes a reference to the britbongs
>europoors

American education everybody

>Implying they don't still do it today

Not even him but,

It's a double insult. Read into it.

You make us look bad mate

IIRC about 4-5% of American men fucked animals prior to 1950

>high level of discourse

And because of Disney and My Little Pony its a higher percentage today.

[spoiler]horse pussy is best pussy[/spoiler]

>How many American men used to fuck their horse during the 19th century?
No american men were alive in the 19th century, and so none of them fucked horses.

You mean "How many nineteenth century American men fucked their horses?"

We don't have good data for that, but I'd start with Kinsey's reports.

>europoors
kek

That's just how Americans reproduce

>No American men were alive in the 19th century

Different claim, chap. Learn to fucking English cunt.

>Can't into the gramarless garbage that is english
>Still expects people to fuckig english

He literally just copy-pasted what you wrote, you twat. Seriously.

Look, No AMERICAN MEN (subject) (here comes the preposition) WERE ALIVE IN THE 19TH CENTURY.

SO WHO WASN'T ALIVE IN THE NINETEENTH CENTURY? AMERICAN MEN IN GENERAL. NO. THAT'S WRONG.

>used to fuck their horse during the 19th century

The double past tense is a clue here, that the issue is current men fucking their horses during the 19th century.

The ignorant poster actually meant, "How many nineteenth century American men fucked their horses?"

I know full well what they meant to say, and am calling them a cunt because they don't know what comes forth from their ten stumped cock holders as they mash them against the keyboard in a futile attempt to talk about /mlp/

>No american men were alive in the 19th century, and so none of them fucked horses.
>You mean "How many nineteenth century American men fucked their horses?"

>How many American men used to fuck their horse during the 19th century?
How many People that were born in America uses to fuck etc.

>No american men were alive in the 19th century, and so none of them fucked horses
Nobody who was born in America was alive in the 19th century

You're a fucking idiot, ESL-kun.

>How many People that were born in America…
This still refers to contemporary people. The nineteenth century in the sentence you propose is attached to the act of horse fucking. You need to put the qualifier of date with the noun of American people.

Try these on:

How many people fucked horses before 1AD?
How many people before 1AD fucked horses?
How many people alive before 1AD fucked horses after 1AD?

Show me the grammar rule that requires the date qualifier to be there.

>How many people fucked horses before 1AD?
Total of people who fucked horse prior to 1AD
>How many people before 1AD fucked horses?
Total of people who fucked horses prior to 1AD

How many people alive before 1AD fucked horses after 1AD?
Total of people who were alive prior to 1AD who fucked horses in dates posterior to 1AD

Dumb ESL, being adamant to the language with the shittest grammar in existence.

Why do we need this question answered?

It's not about the question anymore. It has become something more.

Not as many as you'd think. Most American men at that time preferred dat ass.

You can't swear for shit new bruce.

a very very high portion