Are there any good documents or other forms of documentation that gives better insight on Nazi Germany's racial...

Are there any good documents or other forms of documentation that gives better insight on Nazi Germany's racial hierarchy?
And if there is anything to read about flaws within the racial ideology, insecurities that significant Nazi figures had about themselves, how the nazis viewed Germans mixed with Slavs, and what defines "blonde" for an Aryan.

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish_decrees
twitter.com/AnonBabble

From what little I've read, it seems that the distinction was not that well defined among the nazis either. So long as someone wasn't blatantly jewsish, slavic, or whatever..
Most of their ideas and propaganda never really were that well defined; maybe it was intentional or maybe they were planning on clearing it up later..

Look up Rosenberg, he was the ideological.

Hitler's Inner Synagogue on top, rest under them.

Most of the noses in this picture don't even look Jewish though

>there is anything to read about flaws within the racial ideology
Yeah, raciology being a retarded pseudoscience, look for it, even Mussolini knew it.

if any of these noses were on someone dubbed jewish you'd be making bad memes about it all day

Some of them certainly do, most of those people did not have stereotypically Jewish noses hence why most of the pictures are face-on to obscure them behind the 2 or 3 that do.

Official documents - Europeans are Aryans, except for Jews and the Gypsies
>Diaries, private remarks - German Nordic race is the greatest, Jews are parasites, Slavs are inferior in every way.

It seems like they also perceived Barbarossa as some sort of crusade against "Asiatic hordes". Rosenberg's letter to Keitel reveals that "Asiatic races" were especially hated by the SS.

>For instance, in various camps, all the "Asiatics" were shot, although the inhabitants of the areas, considered belonging to Asia, of Transcaucasia and Turkestan especially, are among those people in the Soviet Union who are most strongly opposed to Russian subjugation and to Bolshevism. The Reich ministry of the occupied Eastern territories has repeatedly emphasized these abuses. However, in November for instance, a detail [Kommando] appeared in a prisoner of war camp in Nikolajew, which wanted to liquidate all Asiatics.

But are the Japanese honorable Aryans?

>diaries, private remarks
You mean Table Talk? People still take that book seriously?

that is a very dumb picture you posted

No, I mean private letters of German soldiers and Nazi officials.
>People still take that book seriously?
Yes, most historians take it seriously, just not the English translation.
There is also apparently something new:

>In December 1942, Hitler held a meeting concerning the Netherlands with Mussert, Seyss-Inquart, Himmler, Lammers, Schmidt and Bormann. The meeting's notes, written up by Bormann, were published in 1976 in the collection De SS en Nederland Documenten uit de SS-archieven 1935-1945.
>In one of its key passages, Hitler depicts the war in the East as a life-or-death struggle because the Bolsheviks would exterminate all European strata (p.895). Hitler also makes it clear that his opposition to the Bolsheviks is racial, not political or ideological: Germany is up against the Asiatic races who intend to destroy European civilization and impose race-mixing (p.894).

>In December 1942, Hitler held a meeting concerning the Netherlands with Mussert, Seyss-Inquart, Himmler, Lammers, Schmidt and Bormann. The meeting's notes, written up by Bormann, were published in 1976 in the collection De SS en Nederland Documenten uit de SS-archieven 1935-1945.
>In one of its key passages, Hitler depicts the war in the East as a life-or-death struggle because the Bolsheviks would exterminate all European strata (p.895). Hitler also makes it clear that his opposition to the Bolsheviks is racial, not political or ideological: Germany is up against the Asiatic races who intend to destroy European civilization and impose race-mixing
Well that's not exactly a wrong notion, Wilhelm II had similar sentiments. It also has nothing to do with the Slavs.

Soviet Union was mostly Slavic.
In 1940 Himmler in his secret memo said this:
>I hope that the concept of Jews will be completely extinguished through the possibility of large-scale emigration of all Jews to Africa or some other colony. It must also be possible, in a somewhat longer period of time, to let the national concept of Ukrainians, Gorals and Lemcos disappear in our territory. Whatever is said concerning these splinter peoples applies on a correspondingly larger scale to the Poles.

It says specifically Asiatics.

Yes, but that doesn't mean they loved the Slavs. Having sex with Poles was considered rassenschande.

Poles are Semitics.

In 1940 they issued Polish decrees which pretty much introduced racial segregation.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish_decrees

You're a retard.

You're a Polack.

>In February 1942 Eastern decrees (Ostarbeitererlasse) were issued concerning the OST-Arbeiter (workers from territories taken from Soviet Union)
And in 1942 Ukrainians also became Semitic.

t. Mönkhbat von Shekelberg