Why was Asia able to recover from European colonialism to the point where there exist a number of relatively successful...

Why was Asia able to recover from European colonialism to the point where there exist a number of relatively successful nation states today, while Africa is for the most part still a shithole plagued with rampant instability.

N_____s

>Why was Asia able to recover from European colonialism

Because colonialism in Asia was fundamentally different than colonialism in Africa (or anywhere in the new world). Even using the term "colonialism" is a bit of a stretch (w/ the exception of maybe say Burma and a few others). Euros for the most part just wanted goods not raw materials and people.

Yawn

>Why was Asia able to recover from European colonialism to the point where there exist a number of relatively successful nation states today

The only states that are good were the ones that weren't colonized by Euros in Asia lol.

Hong Kong?

Because colonialism is an excuse, not a fact.
If anything, it should've made them more stable and wealthy come independence, as is what happened in Australia, America, Canada, New Zealand

So, Thailand and Japan?
Retard.

Because China and Japan both got extensive aid and development from the worlds biggest superpowers,

This, it was an entirely different kind of colonialism.

How are those colonies/nations in anyway comparable? Colonial administration was kept out of the hands of the natives of Africa. The colonies there were little more than resource extraction operations with little thought given towards the natives. Little to no thought was given to educate the populace on administration of a nation. Consequently, when the colonial administration just up and left it all fell to pieces.

The nations you posted weren't run by natives in any way shape or form. Save for the US, all those countries had a smooth transition to independence with a government already well established.

Nazis?

>Colonial administration was kept out of the hands of the natives of Africa. The colonies there were little more than resource extraction operations with little thought given towards the natives. Little to no thought was given to educate the populace on administration of a nation.
This is what &humanities actually believes

...

"The Portuguese "highly regarded" Asian slaves like Chinese and Japanese, much more "than slaves from sub-Saharan Africa" and Moorish Muslims.[77][78] The Portuguese attributed qualities like intelligence and industriousness to Chinese and Japanese slaves which is why they favored them more.[79] Traits such as high inttelligence were ascribed to Indians, Chinese, and Japanese slaves"


Genetics is a thing. I know, i know

...

Nigels?

Different circumstances.

Mostly due to asian countries havin been colonized mostly along national lines and having large dense populations favoring indusdrialization

The borders europeans left in africa make no sense and africas poulation is very sparse making development significantly more difficult

Furthermore africa got super fucked by imf imposed austerity in the 90s directly leading to multiple civil and international wars that essentially undid the progress of the preceding 3 decades

genetics

crying poltards inbound

>muh environment
>muh guerillas
Explain Malaysia, Indonesia, Sri Lanka, Apartheid South Africa then

...

White racism caused African countries to have an average IQ two deviations lower than European and Asian countries

Africans went from tribal societies to nation states barely 60 years ago, they are infant countries. Some of them, like Rwanda, are showing to be smart kids.

>has a civil war that concludes in the genocide of hundreds of thousands with gardening equipment

...

Do you have source for that graph?

They dont have paleolithic brains. Another meme is that Africa was ever great before whitey came, oh no Africa had some kingdoms that had economies on slavery of all things meaning they were hellholes compared to any medieval european place. Colonialism is the reason the africans have any technology from 1500 A.D and above in their hands right now so shut the fuck up about colonialism is so evil waaah waah think of the stupid niggers.

How much of that GDP increase was just additional profits for Western corporations (protip probably nearly all of it) (protip this is called neo-colonialism)

balkanization

>hurr durr every country that has a civil war is full of genetically inferior retards

Guess that includes most of europe :^)

>Africans went from tribal societies

That's a massive generalization

Stereotypes lead to people discarding anything that clashes with their held viewpoint.

It's very obvious though.

>Asia average IQ : 100
>Africa average IQ : 65

I wonder why, OP.

Yes, because Afghanistan is truly a bastion of goodness, freedom and hope for Asia
t. son of Afghan immigrant

t. Kabuli sodomite

You're right about the first part

It was a redundant label because those two words are synonyms.

Kill yourself

You thunk IQ was always like that? Also asians have 105.

really believes this

>european investment in africa: the curve
Thanks

Formerly coloniall Asia is almost completely a shithole