What exactly was the point of creating an entire sub group of people that will be despised the most by others and...

What exactly was the point of creating an entire sub group of people that will be despised the most by others and themselves? All the while being useless to human history?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=mjnAE5go9dI
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Why don't people ever want to hear this subject and admit it's true.

>What exactly was the point of creating
>Creating
Get out.

Get out with that racist BS

because its boring and we hear it every fucking day????

For the same reason trade exists.

Keep an open mind.

>creating something that will consciously recognize it is devoid of purpose but will have to continue existing because of threat of further torment from guy in the sky or the great to be kike
>racist bs
>no rational rebuttle
>every day
when you ignorant phuhk?

Get Out
GET OUT

another kike influenced drama to get black kids to feel sketched out

Having an open mind allows any crap to get in. Blacks are no different than anybody else....

youtube.com/watch?v=mjnAE5go9dI

what are you attempting to convey as a rational thought..?

merchants fear the black man

I guess I’m trying to convey that many fear the Black Man....

>creating
You keep using that word. Who do you think "created" Africans?

Like the term with all its stigma quite done time ago. For the original Definition it goes even further bacj

>Believes in perfect, all-wise God.
>Believes God created Humans.
>Believes God fucked up when he made this creation.
Is that about right?

All right, shut the fuck up.
Are we talking about why the South dehumanised their african slaves or why a caring god would make a people that are destined to be dehumanised?

Nice bait thread; but just so others know, adversity is a source of strength so that might answer your first question. The second you pose is a loaded question cemented by a concluded and factually erroneous point of view; I.E. you need to define a 'usefullness' that isn't automatically disqualified by history.

Africans were used as slaves in the brutal tropical climate of the south and the Caribbean because of their malarial resistance.

Adversity to this extreme is not a source of strength, it's a curse. That's why you still have descendents in the most prosperous nation in the world still living and feeling like slaves, in the year 2000, two fucking thousand and it's JUST starting to wear off, this is humiliation for the creator for eons to come, dead before even born

God has no problems with slavery, or gives any indication that all men are created equal. You are operating from ridiculous false premises. In all likelihood, He created them to do brute slave work for the sons of Shem and Japeth.

the first honest man to come forth. bewildering.

Only Florida is really tropical.

We already have threads about Britain m8

Fast way to pick crops then the jews went full kike and reduced blacks to literal slaves who would do any simple labor that dumb whites could have done more efficiently anyway.

>tfw originally thought this thread was a critique of the social construction of race, before realizing it was more dumb racebait

identity politics is a fabrication, identity psychology however is real as day. blacks have the objectively worse level of identity psychology to deal with, its like interstellar divine tier of rock climbing with no feet. its pure agony to scavenge through, its first desperation then you reach a paradoxical point of christian nihilism, its incredibly strange.

I think you're trying to convey that you fear the black man.

Rich people not wanting to pay taxes was the point. If they were willing to put up with fair taxation they would never have created a people that now stands for everything that is evil in the world. Of course you could say the brits shouldn't have colonised the New World and thus avoided said creation, but they honestly couldn't have known.

do black people automatically get to bypass hell as fair re compensation by the kike king?

>implying there's a point

>christian nihilism