Is this really just a cut?

those fucking forearms man. does he just not work them or does he have awful genetics?

Lowering your body fat does more to make you look muscular than anything else. His muscles only look bigger on the right because he is leaner.

Eating extra calories to 'bulk' only raises body fat and will do nothing to help you achieve your goals.

its just the angle m8

not true m9

His forearms do look tiny.

Hopping on gear doesn't change your routine, if you don't do accessories like traps,forearms and calves roids will only marginally increase them.

>accessories like traps,forearms and calves

I dont think you know what an accessory is.
Also your traps are not like your forearms or calves at all, you use your traps a lot in every lift that works your back
Also your calves are worked when you squat
Also your forearms are worked when you bench, row, deadlift

This guy must just be only doing isolation machine lifts or something, his physique is fucked

Do people really think LUI is not natty?

He is very dedicated and knows how to train, and he is still very small.

The guy has poor insertions, and is like 150lb his arms are sub 15" because of how lean he is.

The worst curl bro I've ever seen. Look at those triceps.

If he took that picture after a pump and he dieted down for a while...maybe.

But I know that youtuber. He knows a great deal about bodybuilding, he's probably on a fairly conservative amount of gear.

>How the fuck did he gain muscle while on a cut?
because he isn't retarded and doesn't fall for the, "can't gain muscle while cutting" fallacy.
also because being leaner makes your muscle insertions/attachments more accentuated

>accessory muscles
>He only trains compound muscles like quads, and biceps

>How the fuck did he gain muscle while on a cut?

Anabolics.

Simple as that.

The amount of muscle you lose on a cut is minimal
Why do people think cut = lose all gains?

Y'all are retarded perfectly natural 2-3 month cut + tan

Is this your 3rd year of lifting already, kiddo?

No, he obviously looks smaller in the right picture. Muscles are just more defined due to less fat covering them.

That's HGH for you

Which insertions are you saying look terrible?

>calls other people retarded
>is a retard

He's obviously on steroid you mong and has definitely put on size. Lighting doesn't give you rounder pecks and traps an inch higher up your neck.

Jesus no triceps.

Looks possible, you can see he lost a lot of fat. Also, being on a cut doesn't mean that you won't make muscle progress

>He fell for the bulking/cutting meme
Unless you are a bodybuilder you dont nees to bulk and cut. And if you were you woulding be asking stupid questions.

no but it creates the perception of having larger muscles you dense fuck.

holy shit just leave.

> muh he gained nearly 200 lbs of pure muscle between these 2 photos!!!!!!!

> how Veeky Forums ! ! ! ! ! ! !!

Those two pics could've been taken 15 minutes apart. I don't see what the big deal is.

Also possibly natty. He's close in the traps but not quite to natty limit.

>>Those two pics could've been taken 15 minutes apart.
this is what fatties actually believe

A small deficit cut won't make it impossible to gain muscle, it simply won't be the optimal choice for building them. Only by getting on a bigger deficit you actively halt muscle building, and with a big enough cut you'l actually lose them a bit.

For exact numbers, see a professional. And try to not take advice from anonymous people in an anonymous board as ultimate truth (this post is not an exception).