Make better names for these countries

Why is India such a mess in every possible way?

Why? look at all that historical continuity maintained within those princelt states

xd

India -> Bharat
Pakistan -> Khyber
Bangladesh -> Bengalistan

Because it shouldn't exist as a unified state. An Indo-European speaking blue eyed Sikh is from the same country as a Dravidian speaking dark brown Muslim is from the same country as a Sino-Tibetan speaking mongoloid Christian just because they all happen to be born between the Indus and the Gangetic delta.

>Bangladesh -> Bengalistan
More like West Bengal

I have no idea about the other two

Hindustan for Pakistan ( ironically Hindustan is more fitting for an Islamic Indian country)

Bharat for India.

Wrong.

Pakistan = West Pooistan
India = Sharat
Nepal = Nepoo
Bhutan = Pootan
Sri Lanka = Splendid Toilet
Maldives = Dingle Berry Isles
Bangladesh = East Pooistan

>Make better names for these countries

Glass crater

The state that shall be bounded by the Indus, the Himālayas, the Gangetic delta and the Godāvari and Krshna rivers is Bhāratavarsha or Āryāvarta. Followers of the Sanātana Dharma, of the Ten Gurus, of Gautama Buddha and of the Tirthānkaras shall be allowed. Musselmen will be either told to re-convert to their ancestor's faith or expelled to the West.

To the West shall be Balochistan and Pashtunistan.

To the East will lie Greater Ahom, the tribal hill confederations and Myanmar.

To the South shall be Drāvida Nādu.

t. Dāmodardās.

New Fyrom

this

>The 1940 Lahore Resolution of the All-India Muslim League demanded sovereignty for the Muslim-majority areas in the northwest and northeast of India, which came to be called 'Pakistan' in popular parlance and the remaining India came to be called 'Hindustan'.[37] The British officials too picked up the two terms and started using them officially.[15]

>However, this naming did not meet the approval of Indian leaders due to the implied meaning of 'Hindustan' as the land of Hindus. They insisted that the new Dominion of India should be called 'India', not 'Hindustan'.[38] Probably for the same reason, the name 'Hindustan' did not receive official sanction of the Constituent Assembly of India, whereas 'Bharat' was adopted as an official name.[39] It was recognised however that 'Hindustan' would continue to be used unofficially.[40]

Good post

The Ganges ain’t free, it must be littered with the piss and feces and dead bodies of devotees... etc.

All those nations should have stayed united. It wasn't until the idea of splitting the Muslims and Hindus in the Raj into 2 different nations was presented that they hated each other there nearly as much as after. Should have just been one, big, united India as a secular federal republic. Would have become a superpower.

>give undivided India independence
>largest civil war in the history of the world breaks out immediately

>they’ve always been part of “india”

Thank god not anymore

>wanting never-ending genocide

>It wasn't until the idea of splitting the Muslims and Hindus in the Raj into 2 different nations was presented that they hated each other
you need to be 18 years or older to post here kiddo. this isn’t because our content is inappropriate but so we don’t have to deal with fools making asinine statements like you just did.

>the only part of "India" that the Indus flows through is a disputed territory also claimed by Pakistan
why not call it Gangia?

because the people living there are Indians?

how can they be Indians if the Indus is in another country?