1453

Don't worry lads, we did good at Crecy, Poitiers and Agincourt. Unless you mean the less relevant occurence in 1453 where Constantinople was taken

*kicked off

>1914

>1776

>1776

>1814

>1815

>1991

>1938

>1870
I will never fucking forgive them, never ever

>1975

>62 BC

Ridiculous, the bronze age collapse triggered a dark age that lasted centuries before the eastern med had recovered. Greece literally had to have writing reintroduced by the Phoenicians, because they forgot how. The late bronze age was far from stagnant.

>proves my point

How? You lost in Vietnam

>Veeky Forums humour

>thinks US forces were defeated in 1975
I love meeting the historically ignorant. Go ahead and tell me which US army formations were defeated, forced to surrender, and who their commander was in 1975. I'll wait.

No we didnt

England didn't lose the American Revolution, they just pulled out because it was unpopular

>1956

Not a war, police action on behalf of the UN.

lol yorktown

>1945

excuse me?

>New Orleans, 1814

That's not humor you Anglo parasite, that's literally what happened.

>1066

The normans weren’t French.

Show me where Normandy is on a map, brainlet.

>Guillaume the Conqueror was 1/10 Danish and therefore not French

The normans were descended from the Vikings who inherited Normandy from the Franks in 911AD. Nice wewuzimg tho.

He was mostly French ancestrally.

>west does fourth crusade
>completely ruins byzantium
>roaches conquer just the shade of it 250 later
W-WE WUZ WURRIORZ AND SHIET

Did they speak Danish or French?

You guys are idiots.

>"Durr! Over a hundred year ago they weren't French so even after settling, intermarrying, adopting the local language and customs they totally remained VIKINGS guys!"

I think we know who the idiot is here.

And then 4 generations of interbreding produced a French William the Bastard

Nice double standard pierre. The Normans did the same in England so we're just as much Norman as you are

Check all of his ancestry retard not just one line.

>Conquer England in 1066
>Give them first actual decent law codes
>Convert their entire aristocracy to French customs and language
>Rule for generations over Anglo-Saxon idiots

You're welcome.

ITT: *ngloids and Fruitty tootties arguing over who's more barbarian

And 1000 years later Anglos rule the world.
And you're welcome for WW1 and WW2 and helping rebuild your shithole afterwards

>56%ers
>Anglos

user...

>1000 years later
Oh shit! It's John Titor from the future!

Never said I was an Amerigoblin.
Neck yourself cunt.

>Anglos rule the world
Jews aren't Anglos you nigger. Anglos don't even rule England much less the world.

I feel you, too

Never forgive the French Politicans who delcared war on Prussia?

but that's not true you fucking moron

>1809

>1622

Show the congressional declaration of war.

>1868

535 BC

history... is suffering. fuck your optimism. the rise and crumble of empires is a cycle of pure suffering

>1618

The UN didn't authorize intervention in Vietnam

it was merely a shadow of it's former glory at that point

>1279

>being stupidly pedantic in order to defend obviouls silly opinions
You lost, get over it

No need to be so rude.

And he's right that it wasn't a war -- there was no formal declaration of war.

>251

>2O4

>1648

Not an argument.

>1683

>1527

>1517

>270

>There are stupid people this confident

> 2001

He was Norse, not Dane.

>476

>312

>1204

>1801

...

>2001

The collapse of the trade routes led to the use of iron and from there steel didn't it?

la dominante did nothing wrong

Nice

You have one more hurdle to straddle, Mehmed.

>1979

>325

>40,000

> 1991

>1918
FTFY

>germs get btfo
Whats the issue?

Fuck off, Nigel. Your country is irrelevant and you gotta deal with it

>1917

...