Mao is so evil because these people died while he was Chairman

>Mao is so evil because these people died while he was Chairman

And? The American Revolutionary War killed 90,000 people yet everyone says it was such a great thing.

Los goblinos arent people, majority Anglo goblinos much less so

Didnt you know? Things are only terrible when non whites do it. When the brits starved 5 million bengals or when US imperialism pretty much triggers regional wars in the middle east its never the wests fault tho.

I can agree that the GLF was in the long term great for China. It's a major reason that China is doing so well today. I can't however see any sort of justification or upside to the GPCR other than to put Mao personally in a better position. It even was a major factor in the sino-soviet split. It shows that Mao was a selfish tyrant

Why do you think the GLF was good for China in the long run? The policies enacted during that were mostly repealed when Mao was forced to the sidelines, and even after the GPCR Mao didn’t readopt them. I’m curious, what positive changes for China do you think were caused by it?

The sparrows were planning to destabilize China by spreading subversive capitalist ideas.

Mao is evil because he wanted them to die

...

It wasn't, he doesn't know what the GLF entailed at all

>people dying in the millions due to sheer central government incompetence is comparable to a war of independence.


>implying

Not him but China went from a backwater shithole to an industrial powerhouse, especially for things like steel and coal, this sort of industry is what's turning China into a superpower

George Washington didn't tell the people to kill all the sparrows and then cause a massive multi-millions-killing famine.

The sparrows and the tens of millions of people were in the way of this.

mao outlawed real martial arts fuck him

The Cultural revolution has absolutely nothing to do with the Sino-Soviet split.

It caused great discomfort to the Chinese people, but it was only a short-term effect.

Long-term, Chinese political system and economy was unaffected (apart from economy slowing down a couple points temporarily), and obsolete cultural customs (making Chinese less productive and fit globally) were done for.

Cultural revolution was an honest mistake. It was borne from the same reason as the 1917' communists and social democrats aspiration for World Revolution: a false, but logical assumption about the development of history, and even making this experiment reinforced the Chinese governance: which led to scientific socialism: a special approach to trying out reforms small scale.

Mao was a sadist, and enjoyed putting people in pain.

>go from producing food to producing less food with retarded farming methods and useless steel
>literally all of it gets reversed later for how fucking dumb it was
>"backwater shithole to an industrial powerhouse"
There's nothing China has achived today that wouldn't have happened without the great leap

The 2nd Amendment should include the right to bear martial arts.

That was a war.

Mao lost tens of millions during fucking peacetime in an act of complete incompetence. The Great Famine was such a fuck up that he spent a decade in the political wilderness up until the Cultural Revolution, which was his desperate attempt to claw himself back some relevance which, again, fucked China up hard.

Nothing good came out of either. Even Stalin can at least be commended for achieving some measure of "muh greater good".

/thread

Because wh*te cracker subhumans try to deflect away from their own crimes.

saved

Mao took measures and mangoes had feathers glued to them in order to infiltrate the ranks of the avian counter-revolutionaries and subvert them with their proletarian juice.

A white mass murderer is literally regarded as the worst human being to ever live and is a synonym with evil

sometimes i just feel ashamed by society

Mao wouldn't have been so bad if he simply stepped down after winning the civil war, and let others handle the business of actually running the new government. Mao was undeniably very competent military leader, but he was hopeless at civilian leadership. Some of the programs put into practice during his time in office were downright asinine, like trying to kill all the sparrows in China, or forcing peasants with no knowledge of metallurgy to try to make steel in their backyard.

>Even Stalin can at least be commended for achieving some measure of "muh greater good".
Mao continues to be revered by the CCP for one sole reason: he won the Civil War and reunified Chinkdom.

It was a huge as fuck deal for the Chinese after a century and a half of chaos. To the point that Mao's titanic fuckups failed to inspire any major insurrection amongst the Chinese, a people liable to revolt at the drop of a hat.

>mao
>good military leader

He was just as great at civilian leadership. Few inconsequential failures in economics (which he was aware of, as he put Zhou Enlai to oversight of economy afterwards) is nothing compared to setting up most resilient and efficient political system and securing a comfy spot in Global politics.
Disregarding Chinese civil war, Korean war was when he fought America to a stalemate with nothing but WWI-style infantry while having equal number and fighting an enemy equipped with cutting edge artillery, air force and naval support.

>Literally millions die
>Few inconsequential failures in economics

So this.......is the power......of Mao.......whoa.

>finally we are unified
>no more internal wars means no more getting killed by the millio-
>oh wait

had 500,000 died in the US civil war, 1861-65?

china is a shithole to this day, you crybabies.
only places that diverge from his policy and embrace "white people" shit show some level of livability.