How come East Asians have a higher IQ than white Europeans despite clearly being less evolved...

How come East Asians have a higher IQ than white Europeans despite clearly being less evolved, less civilized and less enlightened? Is it kind of like how niggers are better than whites physically, in terms of strength, eyesight etc? Maybe in evolution physical strength peaks early on, IQ peaks later on, and later yet something else peaks, perhaps enlightenment? Or everything in the physical plane of existence declines and some spiritual plane beyond our senses is taking over?
upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/07/Civilization_and_religion_map_1821.jpg

These are questions that are fun to ask but we lack the means to test. We can see what is happening but the "why" is where it gets murky. Especially delving into the spiritual.

They were better fed.

Whites strike the perfect balance between social subordination, intelligence and barbarism

t, white apologist

in overall they are more smart, but a smart white guy tend to be more smart than a asian smart guy, because asian people were better fed but white people had to plan more things like hunting and stocking food.

They aren't. China was more civilized than Europe for most of the history.

Civilization has NOTHING to do with intelligence. Aztecs, Mayans, Incas were civilized and still fucking retards. An average Indo-European nomadic pastoralist was smarter than any Mayan who ever lived.

Why do you think this?

>China was more civilized than Europe for most of the history.
So? Africa had people living in it before Europe.

IQ tests prove this. Mayans are still around, they didn't vanish, and their cognitive skills are barely above those of a retard. Average European or East Asian person is a genius compared to them.

Prove what? Why do you think they had the same IQ in the past? White people were considered uncivilized barbarians unable to create a civilization by Greeks and Romans.

Does this mean the Mongols who invaded Europe were actually super smart?

this we are all forgetting that even the smartest humans are dumb as shit, newton believed in magic, einstein was a socialist

humans depend a lot on their environment for success, I would go as far as saying abos would have taken over the world by now if Australia had a nile-tier flood plain and found a naturally occurring high yield staple crop in 8000 BC plus randomly stumbled across iron and gunpowder in 4000 BC

They certainly weren't dumb.

All Chinese I've met have been fucking uncultured people. I don't feel like they're superior at all, rather I feel like being around any other of the colored subhuman races.

He is mistaking the rabble that survive diseases and culture shock with original natives who build civilization.
The IQ is pretty much genetic and with elites wiped out or assimilated into new ruling class(mixed and bleached) the rest have pretty low IQ as it was not essential in their survival(quite opposite I would say).
They actually was.

Cheating is not even common in China its actually done by everyone.

>they actually was
So why they never build a civilization?

They did. But it was different model.
>notallcivilizations

>socialism is stupid

Why would they? You're acting like civilization is something every intelligent person should strive for. Civilicucks ended up being slaves for the Mongols in the end, so who was the retard again?

Ultimately it was the civilized nations that prevailed, not the Mongols.
>You're acting like civilization is something every intelligent person should strive for
It's the reason why humans are more advanced than animals.

>An average Indo-European nomadic pastoralist was smarter than any Mayan who ever lived.
>Eurangutans
>even nomadic tier
Kek

IEs created the wheel, and they abhorred civilization.

More racist garbage. Europeans achieved some success and now they act like some kind of master race. Mesopotamia was longer the center of civilization than Europe and now look at them. One day the same thing can happen to Europe. Stop being so conceited.

>It's the reason why humans are more advanced than animals.
Nope, that's technology and intelligence, not civilization. Civilization is just settlement + farming + some sort of organizational structure and specialization, maybe writing. Even a nigger is capable of that.

>IEs created the wheel

Only the spooked wheel

>and they abhorred civilizatio

correct

...

It's more likely that the wheel was created by various different peoples. The oldest one is from Slovakia, slightly younger is from Maykop, but there are even older toys on wheels from Cucuteni-Trypillia culture.
Indo-Europeans definitely domesticated a horse and invented a chariot.

>Slovakia
Slovenia.

>technology
Civilization is necessary to improve your technology.

>this is what civilicucks actually believe

>memes
How about being more serious? Both populations contributed a lot to modern Europeans.

Yeah, I'm sure nomads could invent a computer.

>muh superior nomads
>baaaw, evil mongols mongolized my beautiful central asia

99.9% of civilized peoples could not invent a computer either.
Really putting civilization on a pedestal is a Roman meme. The same Romans who got serially buttraped by various nomads and migratory peoples, mind you.

Most IEs moved away from central Asia, only retards (see: Tocharians) decided to settle and civilize. By the time Mongols became dominant there, most IEs were long gone.
That's another advantage of nomads, they're not bound to MUH SOIL like civilized cucks.

>less civilized and less enlightened
By white standards?

Greco-Roman standards.