Why isn’t Cuba considered NatSoc?

Why isn’t Cuba considered NatSoc?

Because it is not a racist superiority driven system bent on expansion

It's only considered nationalist because it's allies died. It promoted bolshevism with Venezeula and Russia

yes it is
this me

notice how there are multiple races in that picture user? This is 100% against the core of nazism, which is in the belief of racial hierarchies, and racial homelands.

Race =/= Ethnicity.

Burger detected

They would be more Fascist in the actual sense of the word rather than NatSoc, and even that's superficial.

>It promoted bolshevism with Venezeula and Russia
They also toyed with the political apparatuses of Chile, Colombia, Mexico, Brazil, Argentina and fucking Angola.
They had an impressive power projection for being a shitty little island.

There is a black person with other swarthy spanish descended people in that picture user. This is fundamentally not nazism. Furthermore, there is no real "cuban" race, as Cuba is a multiethnic country, which doesnt discriminate against any one group over another.

They had power projection because they had a lot of support

Marxism believes whites are superior and must be stopped

>Marxism believes whites are superior and must be stopped
(you)

Old school marxism, just wait until the meet our cultural marxist corporations

Kinda memey but it's true. They call it equity. Quit being a leftist idiot. It's what they claim

Quit being just an idiot and read.

>They also toyed with the political apparatuses of Chile, Colombia, Mexico, Brazil, Argentina and fucking Angola.
Source? I know they were in Angola for a while and provided aid to rebels in Colombia.

1. No. National Socialism is much more than "socialism + nationalism".

2. Why are kids these days saying NatSoc instead of Nazi?

Because Nazi is an insult, always has been. It's a short of the name Ignaz and pretty much meant "dumbass" in contemporary Bavarian slang, the Jewish press loved called NS people that.
I think the book Nazi-Sozi from Goebbels is the only instance of NS politicians using the word "Nazi".

>2. Why are kids these days saying NatSoc instead of Nazi?
Becase it somehow hurts their feelings. Weird thing is actual Nazis had no problem with it.

>Nationalism+Socialism=Hitler's National Socialism

Like many other young victims of Novomundian education you got bamboozled. Nazism is quite far from socialism and even the nationalism part doesn't exactely fit.

>2. Why are kids these days saying NatSoc instead of Nazi?
millenial "baw im such a victim!" culture is such an inescapable matrix that even underaged neonazi faggots wont stop whining about how nazi is a supposed offensive slur+the overall alt-right thing of trying to rebrand nazism

But Nazi is simply not a historically accurate term. It's like calling USSR a "commie country" in official literature, maybe it's not that insulting but it just sounds stupid.

Because nobody seriously on politics or history buys the retarded ass meme from /pol/ that tries to sell natsoc as a subset of socialism

Most if not all of those countries were solidary and supportive on their own to cuba; not the other way around.

>retarded ass meme from /pol/

The meme that NatSoc "were Socialists just like the Liberals" is an American Conservative meme that's older than /pol/ and probably the modern internet itself.

Why can't we call it what it is; Communist.

This,

no self-professed National Socialist would ever consider Cuba /theirguys/, nor would the Communists themselves ever consider National Socialism with anything but the utmost disdain.

It's just American conservatards trying to lump everything that they don't like into a single label of "liberal", even though both Communists and National Socialists have nothing but scorn for liberalism, and most liberals feel the same way about them.

Shut up nazi

>But Nazi is simply not a historically accurate term.
neither is natsoc, so whatever point you are trying to make is moot

>neither is natsoc, so whatever point you are trying to make is moot
What is the National Socialist German Workers' Party?

Why were Stalin and Hitler pals for a while before the war then

Something that was referred to as the NSDAP, but never NatSoc, which is simply not a historically accurate term.

And the award for least educated statment so far this year goes to....

it was never referred to as natsoc user. youre point about nazi not being a historical term is moot

You can swap out race and ethnicity and culture in National Socialism depending on the country.

no you cant, and even then, Cuba still wouldnt be nazi since they are a multiethnic country

>neither is natsoc

It is a literal abbreviation for national socialism.

But it is culturally homogenous.

>t. dumbass

...

they referred to themselves as national socialists, retard

Germany was also multi ethnic, south germans looked like meds just look at what goebbels and himmler looked like

Where is this claimed? Sounds made up. I guess you could just respond "lmao dumb libcuck u faggot" if you want but just know it won't make her come back to you

Yeah, but they never referred to themselves as NatSoc.

try and think

And Nazi is an abbreviation for Nationalsozialist just like Sozi is for Sozialdemokrat

>lmao the dumb libcucks don't see it the way i do but its all there, marxism wants to drive the white race extinct and replace it with jews and mooslems and encourage racial diversity and feminism and sjews

1.) It's not a racial state.
2.) NatSoc was an inherently Germanic/ arisches ideology as explained in Mein Kampf.
3.) Nazi Germany wasn't actually socialist in the way Cuba is.

No, according to Mein Kampf it's an ideology specifically designed for those of "Arisches blut." It doesn't fucking "depend on the country."

>impressive

it wasn't really impressive. Cubans were used for projects that the USSR didn't care about enough (i.e. africa) and the cuban adventure in Angola for instance was fully financed by the Soviet regime with transportation provided via aeroflot and the soviet air force.

The intervention was also a big disaster, the Cubans proved unable to defeat starving barely equipped insurgents and were reduced to simply massacring everyone in an area in order to consider it "secure". Ultimately they failed to prevent total victory and the MPLA was forced to share power, the result being Angola has moderated itself into being a pro-western entity today

Cuban forces performed similarly poorly in the Congo, South America, Grenada, and disguised as Egyptians against the Israeli's.

Random fun fact: current Israeli PM Benjamin Netenyahu was in a special forces dealing with an Egyptian raid attempt into the Sinai 1972. They came across a captured Egyptian who was screaming in Spanish. Netenyahu, confused, remarked to his squad-mate "why are the arabs speaking spanish now?"

They provided weapons to Chile during Allende's socialist regime to aid an eventually revolution. Actually, as a matter of fact, the guy killed himself with one of those guns.

Any book you recommend where I can read about Cuban forces in South America? I was aware Cuba financed terrorist groups here but not that they had forces here.

Because that term is bound to always be connected to Nazis. If you're looking for nationalistic socialists, Yugoslavia is also an example, although the attempt to merge the Yugos into a singular ethnic group failed.

That's so fucking stupid.

There were Jewish people in the damn Nazi party. The leadership decided who was 'jewish enough' to be sent to the camps and who wasn't.

NatSac is an abbreviation of national socialist

Nationalsozialist - National Socialist

>Because that term is bound to always be connected to Nazis.

Not exclusively, there are National Socialists that are not Nazis.

There weren´t cuban combat troops really, except in Nicaragua where they sneaked in an artillery regiment to help the final offensive of the sandinistas.

nope. i can believe in multiracialism while also believe in ultracapitalism.

Why are burgers so fucking stupid?

Because Cuba is multiracial and not anti-semitic

>actual Nazis
You didn't post actual "Nazis" though, you posted some American LARPer.

it's a marxist-leninist state, the very thing the nazis tried to destroy

>not anti-semitic

>not liking Israel=antisemitism
Bibi please. everyone (other than /poltards) realizes that left wingers have a hate boner for Israel due to their autistic rules of internationalist+their opposition to zionism

>There were Jewish people in the damn Nazi party.
No there werent. There were a handful of people that didnt fit the nazi party rules of being 100% aryan and had a great grandfather down the line who was born into a jewish family, but Hitler decided they were needed. This neo-nazi attempt to shill nazism as multicultural is so fucking bizarre and pathetic

Fun fact: did you know that OPs of such threads are 75% likely to suffer from mental illness?

Juche confirmed National Socialism

Too BLACK to adhere to shitty wh*Te ideologies.
Also their dicks were too big so they didn't need to compensate with anything.

>Not recognizing an illegitimate imperialist state makes you anti-semitic

>NatSac is an abbreviation of national socialist
So is Nazi

>socialists just like the liberals

When did americans started associating liberalism with any left-wing ideology?