Friendly reminder that Hugh Hefner was responsible for the sexual revolution and is the reason why women today are...

Friendly reminder that Hugh Hefner was responsible for the sexual revolution and is the reason why women today are whores and we're virgins. Be happy that he's dead. Sure he made it easier for good looking Chads to have sex with 50 girls. But he also made it harder for ugly men to find wives.

Other urls found in this thread:

sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/08/160802125209.htm
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

(you)

S

laughingprogesteronetablets.jpg

What are you talking about? At most, he's a negative lesson in regards to higher hedonics. He ended up getting pegged by his shifting entourage of bunnies. A man who did not know that thirst and hunger are the most divine spices available to man's palate.

What really started the revolution was the pill and post-WWII car culture. Now teenagers could drive to isolated places and fuck like bunnies. And the risk of pregnancy was mostly gone via the Pill.

Women have always been whores. They literally have an organ that has no other function except sexual pleasure.

The thing is though, there's nothing wrong with being a whore, because it means my dick is getting sucked.

He was a terrible and miserable human being. But the Sexual Revolution was not his fault.

I think it was culture in general and the influence of psychoanalysis, along with the pill.

50 year old here and you young people are having FAR more sex then I got in high school (i.e. none…) but that said, I can’t imagine what it was like for guys prior to the 60s sexual revolution, when the ONLY way to get laid was to get married or become a sailor and fuck whores in port cities.

>but that said, I can’t imagine what it was like for guys prior to the 60s sexual revolution, when the ONLY way to get laid was to get married or become a sailor and fuck whores in port cities.
But that´s a literal meme that is pushed by traditionalists
It was less common back then, but it certainly was not rare.

>you young people

Just women and chads.

A large percentage of people didn't have sex outside marriage before the Sexual Revolution.
What is with Veeky Forums being in denial that the Sexual Revolution happened? There is no controversy over this, there is a consensus that a Sexual Revolution happened in the middle of the 20th century.
Denying this is more or less like denying that man walked on the moon.

>But he also made it harder for ugly men to find wives.
What would be the point of having a wife if she wasn't really attracted to you?

research has already shown that millennials are having less sex than previous generations.

sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/08/160802125209.htm

>OP thinks he's entitled to a partner/sex
>OP thinks people are innately entitled to a partner/sex

having sex is a human right

It's just midwit progressives attempting to "fact check" conservatives by strawmanning their position on sexual morality (historically) as
>No one had sex outside marriage before the '60s - NO ONE!

>reason why women today are whores
Women were always whores.

>What really started the revolution was the pill and post-WWII car culture

The "revolution" was in place even before then. You had millions of young Americans uprooted from their communities and thrown into military service, with all the sex that entails (i.e. prostitutes and "grateful" liberated citizens) without any of the prior restraints (i.e. a highschool sweetheart that wants to wait for marriage). A similar effect happened with young women, i.e. millions entering the war industries, with all the socialisation that entailed. And then there's the latchkey effect of teens that grew up with mom in the factory and dad killin' Japs/Krauts overseas.

>we're virgins
I'm not
maybe it's your fault that you grew up as loser who complains about conspiracies on Veeky Forums

Thank you for your enlightening contribution to the debate

If the other person is a sober consenting adult

>20 percent of the people have 80 percent of the wealth
>wtf this is unfair!! We need to redistribute it!!!
>20 percent of the people have 80 percent of the sex
>so what haha they deserve it, stop being an angry virgin

>consenting adults

Is there a lower common denominator for morality than that? Literally golden-rule-tier

...

Who cares about betas, they are no different than socialists/collectivists. They prevent the strong and skilled from rising to the top with their crab bucket mentality.

The sexual revolution was good for opening up individual liberties.

this epic debate has nothing to do with Veeky Forums anyway

& Humanities was a mistake