Why is National Socialism a bad thing?

Why is National Socialism a bad thing?

no different from communism

They tend to get a but unreasonable and kill everyone who's not like them. A simple misunderstanding I'm sure.

Hitler buried it forever with his autism.

Aspects of it were adopted by the modern liberal order - it wasn't all bad.

it is cuckoldry

>unsustainable war economy
>one man has totalitarian control over the nation
>autistically murdering your own citizens for no good reason
>no way to speak out against the regime when they do something wrong

better question: why, with all of the evidence, is it not a bad thing for people who think it isn't? same principle as communism.

Same reason every other form of government that invests unlimited power in the state is bad.

So it's just Communism?

They pretty much have the same problems, so yes.

>why is this ideology that killed millions of millions of people considered a bad thing
Literally the same as communist LARPers in universities

Because there's flaws in the current globalist liberal system

Because only nutjobs like Gaddafi seem to like it.

Lack of checks and balances preventing autism from taking over is a pretty big one. You don't need to be democratic to have a system of checks and balances, but without then governments tend to go full autism like oligarchical monarchies vs absolute monarchies.

National Socialism is only one type of Third Positionism.

Jews can't paticipate outside Israel and venture capitalists get fucked. Other than that it did alright.
I think if they switched from a war eco after ww2 and kept up the expansion to a space eco they'd have gone far.

You kill millions running countries at some point or another anyway though.

Autarky is a meme and the relentless expansionism results in de facto globalism anyway.

Because my teacher Mr. Kikestein and the TV said so.

>kept up the expansion to a space eco they'd have gone far
What the heck does that mean?

There is literally nothing wrong with national socialists, as long as they are not Nazis.

because its never actual national socialism, because the world is individualistic and natsoc needs to be collectivist to make a nation stand togather and every single attempt of it became a small number of retards pushing some nutjob theory down the throat of the majority delcaring thats the ultimate truth and everyone not believing it is a traitor

unironically as mentality and economy goes the nordic cunts are the closest to national socialism,

they stick togather
they are proud of their nation
they still allow different opinions although some of the "must fit in" mentality makes it seems they are one herd
economically all cheeky protectionists eventhough they are in or in close cooperation with the EU
they all prosecuted or prosecute a minority (sami)
excellent propaganda, if you never been there youd think its all gays and foreigners lalaland

Still better than anything else

This.
We should lap up propaganda from a failed state that is 80 years old instead.

History and experience show that all political systems which have been tried on a large scale, other than liberal democracy, are shit.

It is not logical to argue that because there are flaws in A, it means that B is not a bad thing.

>excellent propaganda, if you never been there youd think its all gays and foreigners lalaland
/pol/tards always think that if there are five black guys in a city's downtown, it means white genocide.

All that totalitarian genocidal state with a war economy aspect makes it pretty unappealing to me.

In reality the major cities are getting 50% nigs with projections of population decline and growth projecting white minorities within the span of a few years in the cities, followed by minorities in the rest of the country in a few decades.

Historically when this happens you get civil wars and the country splits along ethnic lines.

But this is all going over your head as I'm sure you refuse to believe it's possible for it to happen in the first place.

>they stick togather
>they are proud of their nation
>they still allow different opinions although some of the "must fit in" mentality makes it seems they are one herd
>economically all cheeky protectionists eventhough they are in or in close cooperation with the EU
>they all prosecuted or prosecute a minority (sami)
>excellent propaganda, if you never been there youd think its all gays and foreigners lalaland

These are not qualifiers of Nazism, user.

Post a source
About the civil wars and Major cities with 50% nigs

Too much reliance on the state

It's not that I don't think it's possible, it's that I think /pol/tards vastly exaggerate the reality, and that I also don't think any of it constitutes a "genocide". Also, the demographic shifts are not an argument against liberal democracy or for authoritarianism. A liberal democracy can have a sound immigration policy.

True National Socialism has never been tried.