Is this movie any good? How acurate it is? is it eternal anglo propaganda?

...

It seems like there's a new Churchill biopic every few years. I don't especially care but do anglos find it tiresome?

It's a good movie but...
>Churchill taps his stick
>sounds like he's banging a titanium rod
>Churchill opens a door
>sounds like he kicked open a gate
>Churchill bangs a chair
>sounds like bomb went off
>Churchill climbs the stairs
>Sounds like a marching battalion
The guy was armed to the teeth with his own sound effects

...

Start with a shitty CGI skyline of old London
London, 1940 0400 (Typewrited inn the lower right corner of the screen)
*Gary Oldman is seen power walking towards the camera a busy corridor, filled with flying paper, busy/running staff and the ringing of many old phones*
*dun din dun din dun din dun* (Dramatic!)
Some assistant (possibly fake stand inn to explain the happenings of the plot to the movie goers) is running behind him yelling his name
The assistant: Sir Churchill! Sir Churchill!
Gary: What is it assistant man, I am very busy! (He keeps on walking)
The assistant: News from the front Sir! they have taken Dunkirk!
Gary: (Heavy jawed) AI NOO DHAT ASSITANT
*camera on the ceiling looking down at the two characters bursting loudly in a room*
*Music: BOOOOOAAAM*
Gary: Gentlemen! We cannot let this happen, we must fight back!
Some randy: That's impossible!
Other Randy: ARE YOU MAD???
Gary: No! Cause ENGLAND!
*the two nay sayers look humlbed*
*music quietens for the brief shot so the audience can take in just how awesome this fat fuck is*
Gary: Now, maximize this! Tell Montgomery he is a fool!
Assistant: aye sir!
Gary: Now it's work to be done!
*Gary walks out of shot*
*everyone gets busy agian and music BOOOAAAAM*
*battle scene*

Fixed
>look at saxony

Haven't seen the movie yet, these are my predictions.

How wrong was it?

The chronological time frame should be leading up to operation dynamo, which isn't emphasised on a lot as the movie mostly takes place in London/parliament and some facilities. It's basically about Churchill's grasp of power and proving his worth.

>is it eternal anglo propaganda
I mean yes, but it's a good movie

It's to show he has PRESENCE

It made my mother want to go to war after seeing it.

Eternal anglo propaganda

Having said that Oldman is absolutely based

>"b-but he said bad things"
who gives a shit, it's what people do that matters.
Churchill may have said he wanted to crush germany, but he didn't. He may have said he didn't want to spill english blood but he did all the same and would have done thrice more if he got the chance. This shit is so weak I hope it's bait.

"A MAN WITH THE HEART OF A NATION"

What did (((they))) mean by this?

Why do people quote Churchill as if he was leading policy and not a fringe party during the Chamberlain government, which constantly tried to appease Hitler and who Churchill was a critic of?
Yeah, shocker, the guy who told everyone Germany was going to throw their toys out of the cot and fuck everything up despite appeasement got elected after Germany threw their toys out of the cot and fucked everything up despite appeasement.

What did you mean by this?

>first quote only appears on revisionist websites

Still waiting to hear what they mean by this...

>What did (((they))) mean by this?
Isn't it obvious?>>>

Blow it out your ass, g*rm

Keep in mind the author of that picture had to know that these quotes are fake. They are lying to you on purpose for political reasons.

Yes. I watched it for Oldman, but the film/story is nonsense.

let me guess it's about he's a good boy he dindu nuffin?