Why are people prepared to accept sentimental obvious fiction as fact in ww2 history?

Why are people prepared to accept sentimental obvious fiction as fact in ww2 history?

Pic related

Other urls found in this thread:

wvwnews.net/content/index.php?/news_printer/anne_frank_fraud.html
ihr.org/jhr/v03/v03p147_Faurisson.html
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Diary_of_a_Young_Girl#Authenticity
annefrank.org/ImageVaultFiles/id_14671/cf_21/tenquestions_en.PDF
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Why do you think it is fiction?

Why do people think it isn't?

One truthbomb coming right up for you OP.

wvwnews.net/content/index.php?/news_printer/anne_frank_fraud.html

>no source

Why is it so hard for you to believe that someone was hiding from the nazis in ww2 and wrote a diary?

Also, ihr.org/jhr/v03/v03p147_Faurisson.html

The evidence points to the fact that they didn't. which makes you think. Why would someone make a fake diary? And why is it shoved down our throats so much?

Care to cite any sources at all backing your opinion?

Wikipedia has multiple supporting its authenticity and nothing to the contrary so its not looking good for you.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Diary_of_a_Young_Girl#Authenticity

I just cited two.

Plus the one other user posted.

>why is it shoved down our throats so much?

Is it?

I made this the other day for someone else but finally, my time to shine.

probably the both sides are correct

its all bullshit? no, but some parts obviously were edited to make the book more entretainment.

>but some parts obviously were edited to make the book more entretainment.
Which parts exactly?

Every child in Europe knows the sad tale of Anne Frank

/pol/tards BTFO once again.

I wish all you fascist and commie revisionists would just fuck off back to your safespace.

Maybe in Western Europe. Her diary isn't that famous in Poland.

>schools use a relatable child victim who left a detailed account of how they were going through the same things as the modern students while also being in the middle of massive events

How shocking.

Pretty much. I don't get stormfags why are they so emotionally involved in a topic they know nothing about? The obsession with this diary reflects that. In many Anglophone countries it's a required read and that's why it gets mentioned all the time. It's far from being the only important memoir I know about several more interesting basically the German camp version of the Gulag Archipelago.

Well countries like Poland have so many more "adult" books they don't need a diary of a girl that, correct me if I'm wrong, ends right before she gets taken away and there's no account on her life in the camp itself.

>I don't get stormfags why are they so emotionally involved in a topic they know nothing about?

Because Anne Frank is - in their view - a sort of saintly figure (I think it was Irving who used the term 'Saint Anne'). Therefore once they prove that this 'saint' is, in fact a fraud, they think that ordinary people will become very suspicious of the Holocaust as a whole.

Once the Holocaust is proven to have not happened or have to happened in a much smaller capacity then National Socialism is acceptable again, or Jews are just revealed to be evil, or whatever. Which is why they are so emotionally attached this stuff.

Do you have a source for that image, btw?

annefrank.org/ImageVaultFiles/id_14671/cf_21/tenquestions_en.PDF

Thank you.

That's daft of me actually, I've read that before.

Thanks for this

Keep in mind that "your teachers lied to you!!!" Is a big part of their propaganda campaigns. The emotional involvement comes from this and the idea they were misled for nefarious purposes.

A lot of the problems stem from Holocaust myths like "6 million were gassed." It's easier to "redpill" people when the beliefs they hold are wrong or inaccurate in the first place.

>Faurisson
>source

Way too much is made of the Holocaust within WWII
Its end was a byproduct of the war, not the cause thereof
I had a Jew teach me history, and it was horrendous

Someone post the pregnant Anne Frank pics

I would except I'm not at my computer.

Awww the Hell with it. I’ll do it myself.

I would put “Fuck you OP” as the file name but I don’t know how to do it.

The problem is that no legitimate historical source ever says 6 million were specifically gassed. /Pol/ makes up their own myths so they can debunk them.

I don't think too much is made of it, but rather that it's too simplified.

>Hitler invades stuff
>Auschwitz + 6 million Jews gassed
>Murica
>End

In secondary education, fortunately, I had a very passionate and intelligent teacher who often went off-curriculum (he got in trouble for it too). He explained the Holocaust but also taught us about things like Dresden and the ethnic cleansing of Eastern Europe by the Soviets. He did this with attention to moral nuance.

It's easy to see how people who haven't been taught this stuff fall into the trap of "this is the history they don't want you to see!"

Good job, user. We need more heroes like you to fight revisionist faggots from /pol/.

The fact you couldn't look this up and find the answer in 30 seconds

>written in 1947

That's not how arguments work...

The fact that usual "redpill" threads on /pol/ involve so revealing infographics about Jews in the structures of the Bolshevik party shows how poorly read they are unless I just happen to have incredible luck for authors because I don't think any historian shies away from this fact. Or is it the problem that they give the full context? It's even worse when those infographics are full of fake quotes and claims that this or that person was Jewish (including Dzerzhinsky a fucking Polish nobleman).

Where does it say written in 1947?

...

>shitposting intensifies

>play dumb game
>surprised to win dumb prizes

No problem!

wut

Are you having a stroke?

He misread in the original post and acts retarded to hide that fact, probably.

>user asks what about 1947
>didn't read the meme claiming it
>didn't do a google search
>thinks samefagging wins an argument

Pathetic.

Are you a Markov bot?

The meme doesn't say written...

Friendly reminder that Anne would still be alive if we had won the Civil War.

>The diary was published in 1947.

>Meyer Levin wrote the diary of anne frank
>5 minute google search reveals he wrote a play, based on the diary of Anne Frank.

Another complete fabrication from this board's /pol/acks. How unsurprising.