He killed millions

He killed millions.

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(nominal)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(PPP)#cite_note-CallenIMF-4
imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2007/03/basics.htm
imf.org/external/datamapper/NGDPD@WEO/OEMDC/ADVEC/WEOWORLD
data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/GDP-ranking-table
twitter.com/AnonBabble

>be bong
>know all this is true
>tfw we got away with EVERYTHING

hahahha!

To save the world

Most every major civilization killed millions or an equivelant based on world population of the time

Yes yes well done Great Britain well done...

HOWEVER

At least you'll never be relevant again.

Getting flooded by the third world fueled by your own self-hatred is hardly "getting away with it".
Talk to me when you make it illegal to talk about past atrocities like Turkey.

>Daily Mirror

Never happened, fuck off with this alt-right garbage.

Turkey did nothing wrong

PART

AND

PARCEL

>be nation
>get backstabed by england

>Oy vey those poor roaches and streetshitters

More Indians die from fatal bouts of explosive diarrhea every year than were ever killed by the Raj

what the FUCK is their problem?

M I N O R I T Y
I N
O W N
C A P I T A L

>m-muh muslems (4% of the population)
>muh irrelevant (5th biggest economy on earth and growing)

you cannot beat anglos.

*beheads you*

>meme arguments

Germany, France, Russia and the USA are all less white than Britain. The British economy is also growing faster than all of their's.

>5th biggest economy on earth and growing
>actually 9th biggest economy
>projected to drop to 10th place by 2050
>"growing"
i'm sorry nigel

>muh shekels

>brexit (alienate europe)
>light socialist knee jerk hatred of trump with unironic petitions to ban him from the country (alienate their only friend America)

OH NO NO NO NO NO

>actually 9th biggest economy

what? What are your sources? RT?

>muh international diplomacy autism

You know Trump will be out in minimum 7 years?

all that salt is delicious nigel

>PPP

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(nominal)

Do you understand what PPP is? Purchasing power isn't representative of income.

>Daily Mirror

...

>GDP comparisons using PPP are arguably more useful than those using nominal GDP when assessing a nation's domestic market because PPP takes into account the relative cost of local goods, services and inflation rates of the country, rather than using international market exchange rates which may distort the real differences in per capita income.
>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(PPP)#cite_note-CallenIMF-4
try harder nigel

it's our old enemy... americans :o

Who cares HE STOPPED HITLER!!!

TAKBIR

>when assessing a nation's domestic market
but we were talking about international relevance

Purchasing power is more useful when assessing the general quality of the market in terms of living, but when comparing economic influence and the wealth of a country it isn't.

Yes, an Brazillian probably doesn't pay as much for bread as a Frenchman, but which nation is more influential?

Are you that autistic Russian?

>NBR

>Are you that autistic Russian?
You don't mean armatard do you? I thought he just shitposted on /k/

yeah 7 years of you doing nothing but measuring societal success on how many muslims you import. Britain is fucking dead

>GDP comparisons using PPP
>comparisons
>not just assessing
>assessing with the purpose of comparing
>c o m p a r i n g

...

>talking about economic power
>spergs out because he's wrong and brings up influence
your salt is delicious angus

hahahahahaha

4%

What country are you from mate?

dont find out about the aryan blood facilities too.. ;/

What? Now you're moving the goalpost. We were discussing international relevance and you brought up the domestic market and are now trying to pretend you're being an idiot on purpose.

I wonder who could be behind this post?

>said uk is the 5th largest economy
>i prove it's not
>claims i'm wrong
>prove i'm not wrong
>claims i'm wrong by ignoring the argument and moves the goalpost from economy to influence
>gets called out for moving the goalpost
>claims i moved the goalpost
nice debate tactics malcolm

just following in el goblino's footsteps

>Germany, France, Russia and the USA are all less white than Britain.
That's implying Anglos are white. They aren't.

...

>No source

What are you even talking about? The domestic market isn't the size of the economy... it's the domestic market.

You only proved you're an idiot.

>4%
and that tiny percentage controls your entire country. they dominate your capital, rape children with near immunity, and get you to kowtow to all of their demands. What do you think is going to happen as more pour in?

yeah fair enough

>i've totally been to britain and know what its like

lmao the paki kids when i was at school always got bullied for being manlets

>GDP comparisons using PPP are arguably more useful than those using nominal GDP when assessing a nation's domestic market
let's try to break this sentence down malcolm
(GDP comparisons using PPP) is the subject
(are) is the verb
(more useful) is the adjective
(those using nominal GDP) is the object
now lets try to make a meaning of this
the subject is more useful than the object
the phrase (domestic market) is used to describe the way the object and the subject are calculated
another way to phrase the sentence would be:
>GDP comparisons using PPP when assessing a nation's domestic market are arguably more useful than those using nominal GDP when assessing a nation's domestic market
another way would be
GDP comparisons using PPP are arguably more useful than those using nominal GDP
If you can't tell what this sentence means you are probably under 12 and should get off this website

Wow... you’ve shown me they’re more useful in
>assessing a nation’s domestic market

Which I never said it wasn’t.

You’re being intentionally retarded now. The Domestic Market doesn’t reoresent the international influence of the economy. Are you really trying to tell me Brazil is more influential than France?

I agree with everything else you've shitposted here today, but PPP is a bullshit metric

He’s a slav. He won’t listen.

at this point i just hope this is bait at this point otherwise you have serious reading comprehension issues
>PPP is a bullshit metric
says who?

What did I mistead?

No, go on. Explain how the domestic market is representative of international relevance.

It's not a bullshit metric. Earning 30k in Belarus is not the same as earning 30k in New York City.

i already made an entire post () under the assumption you misread, at this point you are either a 10 year old or a brainlet, further replies will be dropped

Literally everyone is against you man. Why are you still arguing this?

>millions of flies can't be wrong! eat shit too! ignore logical arguments!
present an argument to refute my statement or fuck off

>i will refuse to explain why a domestic market is relevant to international relevance because you apparently misread my post. i will also refuse to explain what about my post was misunderstood, despite it only stating ppp is an indication of the domestic market. despite this being misleading and having no relevance to the conversation

so this... is the power of russians

Dude, PPP is an indication of purchasing power of citizens, not relevance. This isn’t up for debate, it’s fact.

This thread is like the railroad accident in Washington last month.

>to compare economies internationally you need to assess the domestic markets of each country first
>thus gdp comparisons using ppp are more useful than those using nominal gdp at the assessing domestic markets part of comparing economies
how can you not understand it? are you really that dumb?

Germans weren't even considered "White" until the early 20th century. Go read 19th century books on Germans, they're considered "Swarthy".

White = Anglo-Saxons. Some French.

That's it.

doesn't mean gdp to ppp comparisons are invalid you absolute muppet

>to compare economies internationally you need to assess the domestic markets of each country first
hahahahaha what

I suppose Brazil’s more internationally powerful than Germany!

The Indian nation dominates diplomacy above them too!

What an embarrassingly dumb post, user. This inherently favours decentralized economies and is only a good metric of local currency and it’s impact upon the middle and lower classes, not of the economy’s overall size and influence.

They are valid... for the domestic market.

>Germans weren't even considered "White" until the early 20th century
By Anglos. What should I care who non-whites consider white?
Besides, race is an objective biological reality. It's not a matter of "considering". Sun wasn't considered a star at one point, it still was one. These things exist independent of your mind.

at this point the bait is obvious, might as well drop it

...

Haha. Fantastic response.

>Americuck seething because he's a German/British/black mutt

>given proof that uk is the 9th economy by gdp to ppp
>naw itz aboot tha domesteek marcket
>explained what sentence means once
>naw itz aboot tha domesteek marcket
>explained what sentence means twice
>naw itz aboot tha domesteek marcket
no wonder your country's going to shit when you're that retarded

...

Hit the nerve?

Because you refuse to adequately respond to my point and just restate yoyr own point. PPP is an indication of the local purchasing power in the population. It isn’t indicative of the actual wealth of the country, or it’s relevance.

Are you really telling me Brazil is richer and more influential than France?

Waste of doubles.

>Are you really telling me Brazil is richer and more influential than France?
yes
is suppose lack of reading comprehension is to be expected from the biggest autists of global diplomacy

>yes

HAHAHAHAHA

imagine being THIS deluded

This. Only Slavs, Balts(Finns count here) and Germanics are white. Anglos are dirty celtic shitskins.

imagine being this much into denial of the fact it's no longer the 1800s

user, I know you’re a deluded slav, but deluding yourself into believing India is more influential than Germany is just hilarious.

>Go read 19th century books
kek you really think it's the 19th century. I wonder if Iraqis also LARP Iraq as a relevant country just because Babylon existed 3000 years ago.

Daily reminder that Paki immigration to Britain actually makes Britain whiter

>thinks influence equates to economy
no wonder you are a minority in your own capital

That was what this whole discussion was about. Relevancy. And once again, the domestic market doesn’t indicate the actual income of the country.

>imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2007/03/basics.htm
>Market exchange rates are the logical choice when financial flows are involved.
>PPP is generally regarded as a better measure of overall well-being.
Can it not occur to you that measuring the size of economies is not a solved problem? PPP is useful when comparing living standards but its imperfect because by design it assumes one global price for a good, which ignores things like varying wage costs, transport costs (it's no wonder countries with a more manufacturing based economy gain ranks when using PPP), tariffs and other things. Nominal GDP is still used by organisations like the world bank because it is useful in comparing countries

>thinks his country will remain relevant despite falling off the map economically
sucks to be you nigel
i recommend you stop masturbating to futa and try to open a book on economics, i really don't have the patience or the interest to explain how and why gdp to ppp works to someone lacking basic reading comprehension

Good

honhonhon

IS THAT A MFUCKING HARRY POTTER REFERENCE WANKER?

>literally no arguments other than ‘you’re wrong! it is a measure of economic strength! i refuse to explain why!’

>has proven to be unable to read a simple sentence
>wants me to explain college level economics to him
what would be the point exactly? if the imf using gdp to ppp to compare economies is not enough to convince you then i won't be either

They aren’t using those to compare the suze of economies, they’re using them to judge the quality of the internal market for the populace. That isn’t a size measurement.

I’ve noticed you’ve flatly refused to respond to:

>IMF also use nominal GDP
>imf.org/external/datamapper/NGDPD@WEO/OEMDC/ADVEC/WEOWORLD
>It's like both are useful for some reason

>the IMF and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development use weights based on PPP rates (although the IMF also publishes a global growth aggregate based on market rates in the WEO).
>It's like they think GDP to PPP is more valid

>be anglo
>get arrested for thought crime
>detaining thought criminals is defended by people indoctrinated into self-hatred
>"we got away with it"

They aren’t using that as an indication of size or influence, cretin.

It’s also funny you post memes of Britain being overrun by muslims when Russia is 11% Muslim itself.

>GDP to PPP is more valid
For what user, why are they still using nominal for something if they have PPP? Why do the world bank also use nominal? data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/GDP-ranking-table