Are the english actually anglo-saxons ?

Not at all. The elites are Germanic-Celts hybrids. The majority of English people are genetically the same people as the Celtic Britons. Linguistically they are Germanic, and linguistically lowland Scots became Culturally and linguistically Germanic, Highland Scots were culturally and linguistically Irish, until it developed into it's own form of Gaelic language and culture. Scots are 50/50 when it comes to viewing themselves as Celtic or Germanic.

They're mainly Franco-Welsh mutts larping as Saxons.

Who's the guy under the girl?

No, they fist got VIKING'D and then NORMAN'D.

anglo side is missing tom jones. i always thought he was black/half-black

The Anglo children would be preferred over time those genetics are rewarded resulting in a higher frequency of those genes

Most of the Anglos in that diagram have recent celtic and/or jewish heritage.

Which ones are the Jews?

Isn't it kind of cool how the 2 main people who live in Britain aren't originally native to Britiain? The Scots being from Ireland and the English being from north Germany

Barring the fact that this is cherry-picking, is Christopher Lee's inclusion on the right supposed to indicate that he's ugly or inferior? He was decently handsome when he was in "The Man With the Golden Gun"

1/10 Angle
1/10 Saxon
1/10 Jute
1/10 Roman
1/10 Gael
1/10 Briton
1/10 Pict
1/10 French
1/10 Dane
1/10 Zeta Reticulan

>Germanic
>uses Slavs as examples
classic.

The normans left he common people as they were though and the vikings only had a few settlements in the western part of britain.

How many times are you going to make this thread?

Actually the Normans married into all levels of society

>all these assimilation revisionists
Archeological findings leads to the conclusion that there were numerous battles along the Welsh border. Also, the Germanic origin names for the places.

King Arthur was there

>french aren't gallo-norman mutts

French are mainly Franco-Gallic, they're hardly Norman as the Normans mainly settled Normandy and only really migrated to south-east England

Not all celts got cucked immediately.
People like the welsh resisted for quite a long time and also there is based King Arthur to hold the germanics at bay.

They weren't "cucked". They were overrun, replaced and had to flee. Why do you think it's possible to assimilate that many people, even when it barely worked out in current era? Do you actually think Turks are still "more or less" related to Anatolians, or German Prussian to Old Prussians, or North African totally not being Arabic? That the original inhabitants didn't get replaced or something?

And now Anglos claim Arthur as their heritage

Christioher Lee's mother was an Italian countess

>They were overrun, replaced and had to flee.
Nope

>Do you actually think Turks are still "more or less" related to Anatolians
They are

Turkic lineages(Q, and N) among Turks is almost inexistant, and East Eurasian admixture is present mainly in the non-Turkic(Pontus and Western Turkey) parts of Turkey, rather than where Turks settled(Central Anatolia)

>or German Prussian to Old Prussians
Confirmed by haplogroups

>North African totally not being Arabic
Confimred by haplogroups too

>That the original inhabitants didn't get replaced or something?
DNA confimred that no such thing happened

That's bullshit dude turkic genes vary between 10-25% in the average turk. But those genes probably got diluted way before the ancient turks settled in anatolia due to the indo aryan nomads in central asia becoming turk after beign conquered.

>trying to shit on mr Bean
tell me the old german joke where

Top fucking kek

>10-25%

More like 5-10

All Brits are pretty close, genetically. The Anglos had an influence, but not a huge one. In south east England is where you'll find the most influence, but they all have a little, pretty much.
Honestly, Brits are all just one group, genetically, and now that they all speak English, they're pretty much one group, culturally, too.

Is the “British” result on Ancestry Anglo? Because I’m 77% “British” and only 2 percent “Irish and Scottish” and 4 percent total from “West Europe”

Its a bit higher than that.

It peaks at 18%, but where Greeks lived

2.bp.blogspot.com/-9Hsx6aOInUE/Whr2rRxvPjI/AAAAAAAAAJ0/pmpiCOGIKRUfzWmuNXFFQop6zG6Kk6V1wCLcBGAs/s1600/East+Eurasian+1.png

Ancestry DNA*

Wikipedia says its estimated to be averaged around 20% also your source isn't very logical.
The west coast was already an urbanised area filled with greeks it would make more sense if the less urbanised places like north eastern anatolia would have more turkic admixture.

Right, so the country average is somewhere between 10 and 15. 25 is ridiculous.

8000 Normans vs 3 million Anglo Saxons.
They hardly made a dent.

Franco-Gallic? More like Romano-Gallic.
The Frank's hardly left any genes in France.

>Tom Jones
>anglo

The absolute state.

Viking remains were found near a border town in wales.

There was a study by ancestry dna and it states on the average Englishman in 36% Anglo with larger concentrations in the northeast England and south east Scotland

Not even the English are genetically English.

People assimilated =/= EVERYONE assimilated. No one has said that everyone assimilated only that the Romano-Britons under Anglo-Saxon rule did.