Accordingly, the partitioning powers agreed to permanently erase Poland's name from existence in any historical context...

>Accordingly, the partitioning powers agreed to permanently erase Poland's name from existence in any historical context, including from their respective encyclopedias,
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_Partition_of_Poland#

Holy shit they went all out

Other urls found in this thread:

imcjournal.com/index.php/en/volume-xvi-2016/contents-number-3-3/879-the-proto-slavic-warrior-in-europe-the-scythians-sarmatians-and-lekhs
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

And they were all Germans. Even that Russian slut Catharine.

Meanwhile their capital city was still named Berlin, just as its Polish founders called it.

why did they have such a burning hatred for Poland?

Russians hate poland because it conquered parts of kievan rus and created by the rabidly anti russian ukrainian and belarussian ethnicities by partially polonizing and forcefully converting Russians.

...

>all Slavs are Polish

Did Poland actually resist the partitions? It seems like the three powers just split up Poland without a fight.

First partition was done during political turmoil in Poland. There was a civil war between pro-Russian king Stanislaw August Poniatowski and conservative Bar confederation. Russians and Prussians seized the opportunity and joined the war, destroying the confederation. Catherine's influences in Polish politics rose, and she bribed or forced most sejm members to vote to give lands away to neighbours. The signing of partition treaty was shortly interrupted by one of unbribed members, Reytan, who tried to block the way to the hall and tore his shirt to "murder him, rather than Poland".

The second partition, 20 years later, had much different course. By that time king Poniatowski understood the threat from Russia and tried to make Poland more independent from its influences. He, and his supporters had taken an advantage that most of corrupt noblemen were far from Warsaw and passed the general constitution, which gave more power to the king, reducing role of corrupted sejm. The opposition, hearing this, was outrageus. It met at Targowica where it officialy asked empress Catherine for help, saying that king is taking away their freedom. Catherine used this pretext to invade Poland, which was already weak at that time. Poles managed to defeat Russians at Zielence, but Russians kept pushing. Finally king surrendered by officially joining the Targowica confederation. On the next sejm, constitution was abolished, and further lands taken away.

Soon after, one of Polish military leaders, Kosciuszko, started a uprising supposed to empower Poland and liberate lost territories, The insurection was successful at first, leader gained many followers after promising privileges for peasants, but soon Kosciuszko was captured, and soon Warsaw had fallen. By that time fate of Poland was sealed.

catherine was prussian agent that murdered russian monarch

Wrong. No one foced anyone to do anything and that was a huge mistake. Nobles should've polonized the shit out of Eastern Europe, by now entire Ukraine, Belarus, Balts and Central Russia would've speak Polish.
West Slavs are closest to original Slavs as you can get.

It's a shame they didn't succeed.

thankfully they succeeded at destroying themselves and prussian/austrian/russian monarchies dont exist anymore

>muh pure original Slavs
Is it so hard for you faggots to just accept this whole Slavic shit is just a linguistic group and stop claiming we're all the same or that this group is more Slavic somehow than this other group because of some autistic criteria you have in your head.

>Is it so hard for you faggots to just accept this whole Slavic shit is just a linguistic group
For some reason Balkanites can't accept that Slavs are in fact an ethno-liguistic group.

>Balkanites
The pan-Slavic bullshit is actually strongest in the Balkans thanks to Yugoslavia. That doesn't change the fact is a stupid made up thing.
Apart from the language group (because the Slavic languages are different languages, not the same) the people don't share common unique genes or cultures to be considered one ethnic.

>Apart from the language group (because the Slavic languages are different languages, not the same) the people don't share common unique genes or cultures to be considered one ethnic.
Only Balkanites don't share genetic similarity with other Slavs. West Slavs, East Slavs and Balts are quite similiar. Deal with it.

That doesn't make all West Slavs Polish. Berlin was not founded by Poles.

Which proves that there's no such thing as "Slavic" genes.

I see you're already backpedalling on your idiotic claims regarding Slavs. Tell me again, what's the origin of the Berlin word? Isn't it the same as Lublin? I'm not even the guy that said it's Polish. It's obviously West Slavic.
Only for Balkan mutts.

>Only for Balkan mutts.
Oh yes, as we all know the West and Eastern Slavs have never ever been occupied by foreign non-Slavic nations.
Retard.

I'm sorry that truth hurts your feelings, balkan rapebaby.

>I see you're already backpedalling on your idiotic claims regarding Slavs.
I'm not him

>I'm not even the guy that said it's Polish. It's obviously West Slavic.
Good, I'm not suggesting otherwise. I just assumed that you were the guy claiming Berlin was founded by Poles, which is wrong. There seems to be a trend developing where Poles try to claim Elbe Slavs as being Polish.

Particion of Poland-Lithuania permanantly fucked up the ballance of Power in Europe.

7 years war would have gone very differently if Commonweath still existed.

>Good, I'm not suggesting otherwise. I just assumed that you were the guy claiming Berlin was founded by Poles, which is wrong. There seems to be a trend developing where Poles try to claim Elbe Slavs as being Polish.
Poles claiming Elbe Slavs as being Polish still has more backbone than Germans claiming Poland as their Ancient Germanic land.

Not saying it should be done that way.

>wikipedia
>no page given in source

But you'll eat it up anyway. What really happened was that the three powers agreed on not including the name of Poland in their title and that's it. The name of Poland was of course still present in historical works of those countries.

>>no page given in source
how do you manage to write so well while being blind?

Where is the page? It only gives Norman Davies' book as the source, not the specific page

thanks for the informative answer

for starters, the germans always dreamt of migrating and settling in the east

They tried the same thing as romans with romanization to spread civilization. I have no problem with that, for example if you go to Romania, you can still see if a town was founded by germans (like Sibelu) by the superior architecture. The problem is the unique german autism that causes the impossibility to live with them in one state.

>Slavic shit is just a linguistic group and stop claiming we're all the same
Of course Poles are not exactly the same as RussASIANS.

WE ARE NOT SLAVS

Actually Vandals, Sarmatians and Venedi mixed and became Slavs like the Lechites aka Poles.
imcjournal.com/index.php/en/volume-xvi-2016/contents-number-3-3/879-the-proto-slavic-warrior-in-europe-the-scythians-sarmatians-and-lekhs

...

>poooles janitors are at it again

>Brzeczyszczykiewicz

Seriously, why did Poles choose this spelling system? Czech spelling is much more aesthetic.

>Czech spelling
it looks childish to us

People choose their ortography

>Slavs just a linguistic group

Nope. A real ethnos back in the day. The language started diverging only around 5-6th century, and even to this day 90% of us can easily talk between ourselves with a little learning needed.

Nie mow tak, proklyatiy durak blyat, kada pojma nemas kim jsou Slowiane.

>why did they have such a burning hatred for Poland?
They didn't hate Poland in particular. Catherine of Russia wished to annex a major kingdom into her Empire. What are the complications of it?

First, Polish government was de-facto controlled by Russia behind the scenes, so Polish resistance itself in that particular opportune moment would be nominal.

Second, the Great Powers of Europe would not stand for it, form coalition and declare war. Thus, Prussia and Austria were taken on it, to approve and support annexation of Poland in return for territorial concessions.

Third. Polish separatism. A major and long-lasting sovereign entity would not go away, and would be an ever looming threat of rebellion, particularly disastrous with foreign support. However, if every neighbour stands to oppose it, it is quite unlikely to gain any support, and would face combined repression of them instead.

Catherine definitely started to hate Poland with passion for attemps to become liberal state and writing a constitution. It was a threat to every single one of their absolutist neighbours, especially seeing the success of USA/France.

>However, if every neighbour stands to oppose it, it is quite unlikely to gain any support, and would face combined repression of them instead.

That worked until the neighbours went to war against each other and each started making promises to the Poles in exchange for support.

>Written by Wojciech J. Cynarski, Agnieszka Maciejewska |

Polish delusions know no bounds.

Same with Prussia
>The Prussian statesman Ewald von Hertzberg expressed the fears of European conservatives: "The Poles have given the coup de grâce to the Prussian monarchy by voting a constitution", elaborating that a strong Commonwealth would likely demand the return of the lands Prussia acquired in the First Partition

Nope. She didn't hate Poland with passion. He was a rabble rouser working against one of her most massive strategic victories.

Also, USA was nothing like the Revolutionary France. It was, for all practical matters, modelled after England, except it went independent as a colony.

Most certainly, noone feared Poland's potential. It was a prize to be taken for the massive gains.

Well, several centuries of dominance over a pretty big and developed territory is nothing to sneese at.

...