What ideologies instantly mark you as brainlet, Veeky Forums?
I'm an anarcho-primitive
Monarchism
Fascism
National socialism
Libertarianism
Radical centerism
Leninism/trotskyism/stalinism/maoism/hoxahoism
Neoliberalism/neoconservatism
Anarcho capitalism
And worst of all
>Neoreactionary
/thread
Anything that isn't anarcho-primitivism. Stay mad, technocucks.
neoliberalism doesn't deserve to be on there. Its not like its obviously shit or anything
>doesn't mention socialism/communism
Not knowing that Communism is the one true belief for knowing the one believable truth.
Communism obviously also monarchism. All other ideologies I can more or less see how someone might come to support and cant be proven retarded with even the most basic understanding of history or economics.
You are like a little baby
I'm sure fusing Stalinism and National Socialism would be fine though, right?
>basic understanding of economics
Okay, tell us which shitty school of economics you subscribe to, you know you're asking us to ask you when people trot out that line.
>ideology based on one of the most comprehensive and widley supported economic schools
>easily disproven with basic economics
Clearly he is not a communist
To me, all strands of anarchism and totalitarianism, including marxism.
Ask anyone from argentina
Clearly he is a socialist
If i may ask, where in mark's theories does he stipulate totalitarianism?
So, what would be the patrician ideology?
>Let basic understanding of economics
Economic "understanding" beyond the very broad is basically ideological.
Literally moderate liberalism is the Chad of ideologies
Social democracy
Progressive liberalism
Classical conservatism
Democratic socialism
Technocracy and all variations thereof
Nationalism (but not ultranationalism)
Im going to avoid commenting on 'hasnt been tried' ideologies such as syndicalism etc, except obviously terrible ideas such as ancap
Basically any ideology that is primarily based on memes.
Proletarian dictatorship. Because Marx isn't too clear on the inner workings of the social ownership of the means of production, we are forced to look to other theorics and people that actually tried to implement socialism.
I focus on Lenin's ideas, as I would consider him the most influential marxist after Marx and Engels. He believed the only way to achieve the revolution would involve giving all power to the vanguardists. Doing away with constitutional limits and having no separation of powers, so that there would be no obstacles to those that would lead for the proletariat.
On the other hand, you also had libertarian marxists, or left communists if you will, which is essentially another anarchist ideology.
Neoliberalism is great.
t. argie
Um, sweetie, not the guy you're talking to but I'm Argentinian and I love neo-liberalism.
>Brainlet talking about brainletness
Any ideology that relies on "muh human nature" and extrapolates on this idea but doesn't offer any empirical or material background to explain why such and such aspect of human behaviour is "natural", such as anarchocapitalism and so on
any ideology where most of its adherents are teenagers and/or the main selling point of the ideology is its cool symbolism
So you essentially admit that when you say marxism you actually mean leninism?
>sweetieposting and expecting to believed / taken seriously
So how do you explain what happened in the 90s?
Convertibility. A fixed currency is against the free market. Reminder that Alsogaray was against it and was proven right.
"Si no van a abandonar la convertibilidad, es la convertibilidad la que los va a abandonar a ustedes."
If you subscribe to a Materialist take on history, you're a Marxist.
>non brainlet ideologies
Social democracy
Classical Liberalism
Conservatism
>brainlet ideologies
Anarchism
Communism/Socialism/Marxism
Libertarianism / Anarcho Capitalism
Fascism / Monarchism
As a person from your neighboring country, Chile, I can tell you that the reason why Chile is a better country now is because we implemented neoliberalism while you guys didn't.
>communism
>widely supported economic school
Friendly reminder that less than 1% of economists describe themselves as Marxists.
Liberalism. You can argue about the specific brand though (classical to social, etc).
brainlet: the post
>better
Wow yeah what a huge difference in GDP per capita. (With twice the wealth disparity in Chile)
Get over yourself pls, we have 160,000 of your countrymen living here.
Anarcho-anything
>someone from a New World mutt shithole that never had a monarchy saying monarchism is retarded
Color me shocked
Considering the fact that we used to be way, way poorer I think that's a pretty big deal. And it's still, objectively speaking, better.
>Chile was never part of the Spanish empire
Okay m8
>Accelerationism
literally LARPing as the bad guy from cyberpunk comics
go live in the forest shitposter
Libertarianism
Anarchism
Liberalism
NeoLiberalism
Neoconservativism
Democratic Socialism
Feminism
>2018
>being anything other than a catholic guild socialist
Socialism with chinese characteristics
I'm saying that Marx doesn't stand on his own, and the work of later marxist theorists that actually went into detail on how to actually implement Marx's ideas is as much necessary to understand marxism as a school of thought as Marx and Engel's work.
>not XiJingPing thought.
Guess we can rule these out then.
fuck (((economics)))
>critical theory
>social liberalism
>neoconservatism
-neoliberalism
Just because when you are into those ideals you are just repeating what the general population and media says, you are being a simple sheep for "democracy" ( the rule of oligarchic powers trought money) and you are simply trying to be like your friends/family and fit in, forgetting to investigate and too afraid to get out of what the establishment tells you that are "radical ideals"
Wow, so you've seen through the veil too. You and me, we never gonna be sheeple again. All those guys, just parrots, man, not free thinkers like us.
>Socialism with chinese characteristics
AKA illiberal capitalism.