Could someone explain the science behind this: the taller you are, the harder it is to get a Veeky Forums body...

Could someone explain the science behind this: the taller you are, the harder it is to get a Veeky Forums body. Orton is 6'5 and he had to roid to get this body.

theres more of you to work out

Being able to afford the amount of calories and macros you need to grow at that height is a challenge. Not only that, you have to fucking eat it all.

Goddamn I bet Orton's penis is deliciously stinky.

When you are very tall getting enough calories and protein is difficult

But more importantly, a shorter person doesn't need as thick of muscles to achieve the same muscle/height ratio, and can build muscle thickness with less mass due to shorter muscles

>he had to roid to get this body
No he didn't.

But he did roid. Did he have to? Maybe not.

Yeah, Orton is natty as fuck, amirite?

Busted for "wellness" violations

He also has fucked up shoulders, getting full ROM is probably quite difficult

But he won the Royal Rumble so who cares

It's scripted and fake, idiot.

They literally had to change their steroid policy because Randy got popped so many times and they didn't want to fire him.

define fake

>fake
>[feyk]
>verb
>to pretend; simulate:

wrong, everything you see wrestlers do is something they're actually doing, it may be scripted but its not fake.

He kicked Brock Lesnar's ass though

Next you're telling me Santa Claus and the Toothfairy don't exist? Not a wrestlingfag but it's obviously scripted for entertainment, like theatre.

They pretend. That's fake.

Would you call a movies fake?

Yes.

>tfw 6'5, 220lb

still skinny but also some unwanted fat because bulking. takes fucking ages

How do you pretend to jump off a turnbuckle on live TV?

If God made it easy for tall guys to gain muscle, manlets would get too jealous

Jesus called. He said you're a faggot.

Shorter guys get can eat the same amount of food or less and get more jacked because of their lower minimum calorie requirements to get gains. Eventually you just need a larger frame to hold more muscle though. 5-11 to 6-2 is probably the best height for gains.

>Orton is 6'5

He is. This guy beside him is 5'11

MILK
I
L
K

Muscles are longer so you aren't gonna get as thicc and juicy even when gaining the same amount of muscle mass as a manlet

what's his %bf in this photo ?

Common bro theory suggests you can only put on about 2lbs of muscle per month MAX. 2lbs of muscle on a manlet will be easier to see than on a lanklet.

About 26-27%

this thread is bullshit as it gets, look at the strongmen, top dudes are all 6'5 or close to that and thicc as fuck

they're not natty mang

Yeah, they have top tier genetics and roid hard?
Your average lanklet can be strong and jacked and huge IRL, but he'll never look insane natty in pictures

square cube law.

Someone who's 6'5 vs 5'9 needs roughly 15%(raised to the third power) amount of muscle to be proportional.

So 10lbs for manlet man is about 15.2lbs of muscle for lanklet lenny.

>"oh, but the lanklet should be able to build muscle 52% faster than the manlet because he takes up more space right"?

Hell no, at least not as a natty.

There it is

That's just proves Orton is 6'0.