If different breeds of dogs exhibit different behaviours, why does the same not apply to humans?

It does.

Best dog?

I want a rottie but I'm sad that their life expectency is only 8-10 years. Seems pretty low for a dog their size to be honest. The ones I've seen IRL are like thicc'er labs

anyway here's my mutt political prisoner that I got from the pound.

There's literally nothing edgy about a fundamental truth you happen to not like.

I approve of this mutt. Looks sproingy and energetic.

I have to give you props OP, this racewar bait post is cleverly veiled

It does apply.

When you leave dogs in the wild or unattended, the wh*Te poodles can't hunt and are left fighting for the scraps of the BIG BLACK Pitbulls. Wh*te poodle bitches also love to be impregnated by the BBPC (BIG BLACK PITBULL COCK).

So is happening with humans. I love pictures like this because it reminds me we are winning the evolutionary race with our BIG BLACK COCKS.

KARA BOGA rules over the puny wh*toids just like the BLACK PITBULL rules over the wh*te poodle.

>Caucasoids have higher-bridge noses, not because it's a microevolutionary advantage since then air would remain more time in the nose, making it warmer and moister once it reaches the lungs, which is rather convenient in colder climates, but because God said so.

Wait l recognize this image
Gooksinthewire is that you?

Wh*te bitches love the BBPC
Its instinct to crave BLACK COCK

I've posted it on /k/ and in the meowmix movie stream sooooo I wouldn't be shocked if you've seen it kek

THIS! THIS SO FUCKING MUCH!

EVERY ENVIRONMENT
EVERY CULTURE
EVERY SOCIETY

ON MUTHAFUCKING ERF BE EXACTLY DE SAME

>i can't debate the facts so i'll call it edgy and derail the thread instead

Dogs don't give a shit either the other house dog is a poodle or retriever or collie.

So what's the history on pugs?

Breathe bro, I'm saying everyone is different.

If OP is a faggot

Why isn’t anyone else?

No humans have been subject to that kind of selective pressure. We always select for intelligence, and we always select for selecting for intelligence.

Remove blacks. Make whites and east asians first class. Indians, SEA monkeys and sandniggers get to be second class serfs.. No miscegenation.

Guaranteed prosperity and progress.

*tips fedora*

Guaranteed inbreeding.

>We always select for intelligence, and we always select for selecting for intelligence.
This is factually false

>races
No such thing.

Because free will. This is my biggest beef with so called "race realists". The fucking Richard Dawkins tier material reductionism. If I believed in materialism I woudln't be a fucking reactionary. How can anyone who considers themselves to be right wing denounce free will? It's mind boggling.

Go on. Tell me when and where being more intelligent was not an advantage.

That's right, yes.

If evolutionary biology strikes you as highly watery and extremely unfounded conjecture, you would be correct because that's exactly how it is everyone! If I get up in front of everyone with a PhD or type a paper on something relating to evolutionary biology when I'm a 55 year old community college teacher, I too can add something to the shit heap that is evolutionary philosophy! Thanks Darwin, now we're one step closer to finally implementing eugenics!

I already pointed out it in the other thread. But the ideologies they worship are left wing. It seems they like to impose the word "right" into their names. Pathetic.

>be intelligent enough to get by
>also have way more testosterone than someone compared to a person who is just a tiny bit smarter than you
You can literally see this happening in the Middle East.

You are clearly the offspring of some dumbass yourself. You probably think all humans everywhere are getting smarter every generation boy are you in for a surprise. And with the introduction of Birmingham control it will get even worse because intelligent women are more likely to use it and have less kids than less intelligent women

So you agree with me?

It is just not possible for groups under different environmental pressures select for intelligence equally.
Besides, intelligence has a multitude of aspects that, too, would not be selected for in all environments.
And behaviour is more than intelligence.

Furthermore we are our own environment. Reproductive success is not only based on what is useful but also what is attractive. And so cultures with different values impact evolution.

Finally, currently intelligence is selected against : the people who demonstrate the best intellectual abilities have less children than average, and often less than replacement levels.

NO DUDE SEE

EVERYONE IS GETTING SMARTER MAAAAAAAAAAAN

EVERYONE KNOWS SMART PEOPLE HAVE MORE KIDS THAN DUMB PEOPLE MAAAAAAAAAAAN

Being smarter is still an advantage. You're saying you can't have high testosterone and be highly intelligent, well I disagree.

The guy with high test and high IQ wins over the guy with high test and low IQ in every competition they could get into. I am willing to argue if you don't agree.

>You're saying you can't have high testosterone and be highly intelligent,
THATS NOT WHAT I FUCKING SAID YOU DUMB MOTHERFUCKING CUNT

Civilization might allow selection against intelligence. But not for the people right at the bottom, only people at the top, the people who are protected from their own bad decisions by the good decisions of everyone else.

However, these are also the people who get the best education.

No.

>>be intelligent enough to get by
>>also have way more testosterone than someone compared to a person who is just a tiny bit smarter than you

Then what did you mean by this?

Of these two people, maybe the person with a massive test advantage wins over the guy with a tiny IQ advantage. But IQ and test are not opposed to each other. One does not have to pick between them, only to pick people who have the most of both. And this is what women always do.

This board is filled with some of the dumbest people on Veeky Forums. Were do you come from? You all honestly think everyone is getting smarter that is inane

In order to understand free will you need a certain minimal IQ score.

>smart people
How do you measure that?

Less intelligent people are currently outbreeding intelligent people. That is a FACT.

competition over what?

the only thing that matters is whether you genes are still around 100 years after your dead, and generally "smarter" people have fewer offspring than normal people.

>you need to understand free will in order to have free will

>waaaah why do people have babies!! it's not fair!

You can’t. Intelligence is literally unmeasurable.

Why you brainlets keep posting that graph? The limit should be 0 instead of infinite.

Source?

You mean poorer people. They aren't subject to the same dysgenic forces as rich people, who can fail all day and suffer nothing; poor people breed based on how successful and intelligent they are.

Richer people have fewer offspring. Doesn't have much to do with IQ.

THIS THIS SO FUCKING MUCH

BEING RICH HAS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH INTELLIGENCE

BEING POOR HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH INTELLIGENCE

ALL THOSE POOR JANITORS ARE JUST AS SMART AS RICH DOCTORS

Intelligence is not so homogenous that it could ever been bred for specifically. You could possibly breed a naturally talented calculator. Or someone better suited to mapping out a complex solution to a problem. That's the main flaw of IQ tests, they test a limited spectrum. Intelligent in the stone age would be someone who could tell exactly where he was by recognising the rocks under his feet, calculate the fastest way for the group to get to an objective.

...

On average you will definitely find rich background doctors are not as smart as poor background doctors, at the same level of qualifications and compensation. And that poor background janitors are smarter than rich background janitors.

Rich people have worse DNA because they are not subject to selective pressures. But they have better education and this is worth a lot.

Poor people have better DNA because they die if they fuck up. But they have no education and that's a big deal.

Are you serious? How man female doctors do you know who have five plus kids? this has to be bait fuck you

That’s a great idea you’ve got there. Too bad exceptions don’t invalidate the average. Now go clean my toilet, genius

>Intelligence is a socialist construct and culturally relative.
This meme again.

>Intelligent in the stone age
Well it’s a good thing we aren’t in the Stone Age anymore you dumbass
>w w well if if things were were d d different things would be different

Ok, here's my dog. He's a mutt but you want dogs to be mutts, they're healthier and less prone to various problems.

>political prisoner
What did he do?

THE KING OF ALL DOGS! THE QUEENSLAND AUSTRALIAN CATTLEDOG!