Who is the greatest man that ever lived?

Who is the greatest man that ever lived?

Other urls found in this thread:

discord.gg/bATCZH
soundcloud.com/yungyouth/guacamole-lullaby
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timothy_Dexter
theguardian.com/world/2001/oct/07/books.booksnews
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Pic related

Me

Napoleon Bonaparte, Bane of the Brits

...

Yes, Isa (A.S) was one of the greatest MEN definitely

...

King David

/thread

Why does he look so startled in that painting?

Not too sure. A lot of his portraits bear the same look- I believe it was the artists own style.

Either way, /thread.

discord.gg/bATCZH

William Wallace

That's not even a possible question to answer.
As one could argue that the person who discovered fire is the most important person in history, or the first to use stone, or even the first to stand straight.

Or then you could say people like Romulus, Julius Caesar, Muhammad, Jesus, Napoleon, Gavrilo Princip, Hitler, etc. etc. People who started chains of events that changed the world in a matter that made it almost unrecognizable to someone who was before it.

In reality the most important person in history is probably just some completely irrelevant person that started the chain of events that led to civilization, but we will never know that persons name. If he even had a name.

braindead post

>he

>hominid b kills hominid a 1 million years ago
>hominid b goes on to give birth to a monkey that will eventually be the ancestor of the first human
How is hominid b not the most important person in history?
If he had died in fight human wouldn't exist.

Read the OP again and tell me if it says 'important'.

...

This guy

Ooga from the Loonga tribe who sired Aoga,Noonga and Dunga which sprinboarded modern humans 16000 years ago

...

>t. Buttrustled frog

soundcloud.com/yungyouth/guacamole-lullaby

was he /ourguy/?

no, he killed people

this
Killing is bad

yeah you can't be a great man if you kill people

For ever great man in history who had his voice heard, there was 10 000 greater men who died never having theirs heard.

...

...

...

What a legit faggoty thing to say.

...

How conceited can you get?
I love it!
This guy is clearly the greatest man who ever lived.

Molon Labe

> Romulus
...

...

Timothy Dexter
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timothy_Dexter

Probably Karl Marx.

/thread

ahem

Easy.

Already posted

Napoleon.

pr*ssiens will never recover

This guy is the best who ever lived.

This is the only intellectual answer. The Butterfly effect is real.

Not even the best English king

>ever lived

Then they weren't great at all.

True

Lionheart isn't even English anyway

brainlet post

>King Richard the Lionheart isn't English
What the fuck?

/thread

He was a Frenchman from a French family, and he spoke only French and Occitan

Why do you think his name on his London statue is written in French?

>Why do you think his name on his London statue is written in French?
French was lingua franca at the time; furthermore, it was a popular second language for the knights
GET REKT FROG

He was Born in England, raised in England and is descended from Alfred the great, of course he spoke English

>He was Born in England, raised in England
Being born in a stable...etc
Wellington isn't Irish...etc

>and is descended from Alfred the great
But mostly from the French Plantagenet family, the one he took his name from

>of course he spoke English
It's very well documented that he didn't
His only two languages were French and Occitan

SPBP

>tfw your existence stoped Persian values from overtaking western values as the values of the most powerful civilization in the cradle of civilization
If he never conqoured Persia Greece could have been another backwater blip in history with backwards values

Forgot pic

He fired his chancellor William Longchamp for being unable to speak English. Also the "born in a stable" argument does not apply here. Why do Frogs desperately look for any figure that's remotely french and try to pathetically cling to them due to their lack of Historical greatness?

This

>Also the "born in a stable" argument does not apply here

Yes it does
Lionheart was born in 1157, the son of a Frenchman who arrived in England (and became king of it) in 1154

He was literally less English than your average grandson of Paki immigrant right now in East London

>Jesus didn't exist

CAIVS

IVLIVS

CAESAR

A hypothetical fusion of Jesus, Socrates and Siddhartha Gautama.

Most likely this guy honestly

> Lack of great historical figures
What ? At the same period, Philippe Auguste was much greater than Lionheart. He actually defeated him numerous times.

tossup between stephen colbert and john oliver desu

theguardian.com/world/2001/oct/07/books.booksnews

...

...

Cyrus the Great.

Nah, he got BTFO by Alexander and died a hobo

>confusing Darius III with based Cyrus II
Absolute state of Veeky Forums

Obviously.

...

"You're not painting me right now, are you?"

>Fictional character
>GOAT
>Obviously

By that logic, the fucking amoeba that first spawned a multi-cellular life form was the Greatest Man Who Ever Lived.

fpbp

>glares disapprovingly

Yeah a dog born in a stable, except the dog doesn't have horse ancestry nor is it of the same race, what are you some kind of revisionist?
"Richard the Lionheart was a great English king who-"
>Um ACKSHYUALLY

Phillip II beat King John not King Richard

...

theres no askhually, you fanboy a king that wasnt yours
romanian tier history

...

>oh fuck the russians are coming back

brb being the scourge of God

Prophet Muhammad ( sallallahu alayhi wa salaam)

Robert E Lee is as honorable as one can get.

You're the type of person who says King John was English because he was bad.
Also your logic:
Charlemagne was Belgian
Napoleon was Corsican
Wellington was Irish
Stop wewuzzing you worthless frog. When your "Country" has actually contributed anything to history then you will have figures to claim

Those are all true.

Nikola Tesla

>king john is English because he was bad

>You're the type of person who says King John was English because he was bad.

Richard and John were both French
And John was unironically a better king than Richard

Except they were both born and raised in England by Englishmen and they were descended from the house of Wessex. That's pretty English if you ask me.
Also King John revisionism is shit as people just see the absence of king Richard as a terrible neglect when in fact it enabled stability as monarchs would have trouble with nobles, furthermore thanks to holding half of France, Richard made England fairly prosperous. Of course this was all buggered up when John lost all his French clay and ended up having his Barons rebel against him. He sold England as a vassal state to the holy see and squeezed his Barons and citizens for tax and sometimes kidnapped noble sons as ransom.

What a stupid thing to say. Circumstance is insanely important.