At what point in history did we shift to the dystopian timeline?

At what point in history did we shift to the dystopian timeline?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Profit_motive
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

The fall of Alanxandria. Idk.

You should ask him.

Neolithic revolution.

The minute that humans entered the arena.

French Revolution or 1918

Either 1453 with the fall of Constantinople which led to the R*naissance or February 23rd 1744 with the birth of Amschel Rothschild.

Nice church you got there...

April 9th, 1865

Full neoliberal dystopia seemed to start shifting into high gear around 2012

When the Entente won WW1

The moment the first fractional reserve banks werent destroyed.

Discovery of the new world

This pretty much.

This literally will lead to Kaiserreich tho. Syndicalists will be warring for a utopia

Pr*ssiaboos get out

When Napoleon lost

When drumpf won the election

When Nestle was allowed to decide water was not a human right
When companies started to mine our data for profit
When the UK and China decided it was okay to monitor their citizens 24-7
When laws protecting information exist to protect companies and exploit everyone else

The entire setting of Kaiserreich makes 0 fucking sense.

The founding of the first cities in the middle east. Civilisation requires slavery to sustain itself.

nice meme, /gsg/

the early death of Alexander the Great.

July 4th, 1863

you posted it my man

we live in a post apocalyptic world (the world wars were the apocalypse)

fuck off /pol/

not an argument

Neither is a propaganda .jpg cobbled together in photoshop

it's the truth cobbled together in a jpg

it says more than i can say in pages of text

I mean we avoided the Cuban Missile Crisis, so clearly we didn't get the worst ending

When monotheism started to exist in the near east. The world would be a much better place without that particularly bad idea.

It's heavily biased cherrypicked propaganda aimed to people who consume sensationalist media and have a meme-tier understanding of history.

>It's da TWOOF
Then why does it contradict the usual /pol/ narrative?

the world was progressing perfectly up until 1914, that's when it all went to shit

>It's heavily biased cherrypicked propaganda aimed to people who consume sensationalist media and have a meme-tier understanding of history.
it's shows wide variety of things wrong with Europe today
>hordes of foreign masses in our cities living in ghettoes, getting away with rioting, raping, looting
>nihilism
>the family destroyed
>low birthrates
>media and education biased against the natives
can you imagine a man from 1914 Paris coming to modern Paris? It would be like the planet of the apes, i can imagine him going "damn you, you blew it all to hell" when he sees the eiffel tower and realizes where he is

>>It's da TWOOF
>Then why does it contradict the usual /pol/ narrative?
i have no idea what this means

Somewhere between 1980 and 1990

This.

lol no it wasn't

1914 was just the inevitable end result of the idiotic political ideas that had come to dominate europe at that time.

>>muh alliance system will totally prevent major wars you guiz!
>>oh wait no it doesn't

the fact that 1914 was inevitable is true and unfortunate

if only the great powers of the time could see that THE war would be their undoing, no matter who wins, the world would be a much better place today

>Implying nuclear holocaust isn't the best option
Fucking life cuck...

>
Boy all the currents we saw flowing there were seen before as well

>water is human right
Imagine being this dull..

>it's a /pol/tard misuses the word neoliberal episode

Too many people thought war was glorious before WW1. I remember reading that even Italian socialists wanted to join because they thought it would be cleansing for society or something like it would help tear down old structures

AND IT ALL WENT TUMBLING DOWN

Industrial revolution

>"What If I put the seeds back to the ground, so I can have more seeds?"

When Anne Frank didn't get pregnant.

Fourth Crusade

robbespierre not being hung, quartered, castrated and his private parts burned before his eyes (not in that order ofc) as the punishment for traitors should be

More like commiespeak

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Profit_motive

when everything became centered around this.

The Fall of Ming

Cuban Missile Crisis turning hot would have conclusively erased the Soviet Union from existence and aborted communism early.

The fall of the Song Dynasty

>fall of the Byzantine Empire
>fall of the Sassanid Empire
>Cortes conquering the Aztec Empire
>the American War for Independence
>the Age of Imperialism (Perry arrives in Japan, "the scramble for Africa", "the great game in China")
>the Spanish-American War
>assassination of the Archduke
there were many points where we should've turned back

when alphago has beaten the best human players

1789

I have a theory that Reagan is responsible for 90% of the problems our country faces, but we can't discuss it and exorcise his ghost because one party idolizes him. That's not to say the Democrats are without sin, they have more than their fair share of shit, but Reagan really fucked us up

1492

Yes, being literally worked to death as a castrated slave in a Roman silver mine was ok as long as they had more than one god.

Ming was shit tier compared to Tang/song tbqh

When we discovered agriculture

Yeah, he is responsible for creating the ideologies for the most murderous regimes in history

>Cuban Missile Crisis turning hot would have conclusively erased the Soviet Union from existence
Yeah but us too

Soviets had less than two dozen ICBMs and most bombers would not get through. Meanwhile the US had a massive ICBM superiority and their bombers WOULD get through after they had nuked the shit out of the Soviets with missiles first. They'd be doing round trips for a couple days until there wasn't even rubble left.

Western Europe would be an irradiated wasteland almost as bad as the USSR due to medium range missiles but that's another story.

>1066
>Guillaume sails from Normandy to Hastings, confident
>"I'll just teach that punko saxon Harold a lesson and then build some castles on his shit haha. It'll be good"
Little did he know, Guillaume created the ANGLO.

>Syndicalists
I don't get this, either Churchill or Mosley would win, but certainly not a commie.

Like it or not, they were right.

An Anglo is just a Celt that isn't blue.