GOAT?

GOAT?

Nope

But user, that's clearly a horse.

LA VICTOIRE EN CHANTANT

massively overrated on this board

Because it's full of contrarians who are sick of Anglocentric history

Combination of the two, many on Veeky Forums see him as one of the "greatest" but it seems a massive majority of Veeky Forums are even MORE dedicated to stopping the board from becoming dominated by one group of people.
When vikings were spammed, anti-viking shit spurred up everywhere.
When Rome was spammed, anti-rome shit started happening constantly.
At the minute there is a LOT of usually /pol/ crossposters trying to dominate the board and everyone sees it as yet another attempt to start a /brit/ general, all of which are shitty facebook tier circlejerks.
Long story short, if you try and force people to like/respect something on Veeky Forums the board will bite back with several reasons why people should do the opposite.

>there is a world where Napopan exists
>in that world we all speak french

this, the Anglo fears the baguette dwarf

No this Demigod by the name Washington was and always will be the goat.

He was a terrible general.

pshh...nothin personell, kid

While Washington is best known for the positions he held, both as a general and president, it is his willingness to surrender power that may be his most important legacy. On December 23, 1783, Washington strode into the Maryland State House in Annapolis and surrendered his military commission to Congress – thereby affirming the principle of civilian control of the military. When King George III heard that Washington would surrender his commission, he reportedly said that if "He did [this] He would be the greatest man in the world."

He wasn't terrible, he was average, and he was fully aware of that.

Okay burgermutt

State the country you reside in coward.

What's that angel near the foot for?

For his time he was truly one of the best

To show the difference between 5'11 and 6'1

>tfw Napopan himself couldn’t even speak French

Louis Nicolas Davout was the true goat.

...

hard work was made by Davout.

No it wasn't retard. Davout wasn't even Napoleons best general

...

>XIXth century was supposed to be the French Century

This guy and his nephew ruined that.

To be fair, when the century started France was already a shitshow

Davout block 30 000 austro-russe with 12000 man at tellnitz. It's why the battle was win.

So you're saying Napoleon could have just stayed in his tent and got drunk and had the battle win itself because of what Davout did?

>XIXth century was supposed to be the French Century
Lmao. If anything, Napoleon was their last shot

Are you having a stroke, user?

If he was the leader of the french army yes.

Kleber or Davout were not inferior to Napoleon.