I am very interested in historical pornography, pornographic pictures and early erotic movies.
I found out that the first porn movies were made around 1900.
Link related: youtube.com
This seems to be the very first erotic movie, but we only have a little part of it.
Post your historical movies and pictures
...
...
...
>ywn fuck this aesthetically
Might as well stop trying.
...
THIIIIC
obligatory
...
...
...
...
...
Someone post ye olde trappe
>ywn see victorian era CP
Fuck. It's even legal to watch and own, yet nothing has ever surfaced.
Let me guess - it's a British faggot in drag.
I´ve read the first pron films were shoot in Argentina
>Fuck. It's even legal to watch and own,
come again?
>bush
Man am I glad I don't live in such savage times
Well, this thread makes me realize that women back in the day weren't all matronly and mediocre-looking.
Could be worse, could be shamed.
Jesus christ didn't they have razors back then?
Bush and hairy armpits is literally patrician taste user.
>not liking bushes
get a load of this fag
Oh come on why the tiny censor
I've heard that the first porn movie was "am abend", produced in germany in 1908 but never found the sauce online.
Does anybody have the source of those movies?
God I hate millennials.
You must be a little boy, because women have pubic hair.
I don't think any CP is legal in most countries user.
>everyone I don't like is a millennial
Don't you have a social security check you should be cashing in right now, gramps?
...
...
...
look up "A free ride" on wikipedia
earliest US porno
>All these lesbian shots.
They truly were men of culture, I see.
...
BRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR-AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP
You're a fucking loser on multiple counts
based brapposter
It isn't legal anywhere. BUT! CP produced before the mid 20th century is legal to own, but good luck with that unless you're an actual photography buff and/or professional. I explicitly remember reading about that law, the basis for it being that the pictures were produced before the feminist age of consent laws and other totalitarian measures. The reason for this was the fact there are metric fucktons of vintage CP which has value due to it being over a hundred years old and that everyone involved is long dead.
These beautiful treasures are locked away in various museums, and there are legit books with copies of these, but I don't remember their names. It's professional literature, really expensive and not for plebs.
In other words these pics user is posting are just a sad, sad fraction of nothing special. It's just sex. Vintage CP however was a purely aristocratic kind of deal, and I'm utterly fascinated by their ideals. I'm curios about what they found erotic and if there's any connection to our times.
tl;dr modern pedophilia isn't modern at all, it's something inherent to our species and we're the odd ones out.
For the record, I'm one of those autists who are only interested in Veeky Forums tier erotic fantasies. Modern sex is utterly meaningless and if it weren't for Japan I'd be asexual or some other kind of weirdo.
I despise you. Hairy pussy is beautiful, it's shaved cunts that are whorish and ugly. If she's shaved it's the same like she's a public toilet.
Kudos, hairy armpits are erotic as fuck.
But user if you are a pedo why do you like bush?
Why can’t you just be a normal fucking human being and not have these disgusting fetishes
Do you mean photos like those of Lenhert and Landrock? Cause those are everywhere.
Correction - I'm in love with women as a whole. A normal, hairy pussy is beautiful, sexy, natural. A shaved one just looks ugly and is meant to be used and seen often, meaning that it's a clear sign of whoredom.
Is that an eggplant?
I've got a fuckload of these late Victorian 3d porn pics.
Apparently they were originally two separate images that you'd view through some sort of device that projected one to the right eye and the other to the left eye to mimic the appearance of a 3d image, but here they're animated to replicate the effect.
...
...
...
It's far more likely the 3D effect was added by some retarded spazz who can't use his imagination and needs to be constantly bombarded by movement.
>implying you ever had a chance of fucking anyone ever
Nah, they really were two separate photos originally. Some of the .gifs have archival marks on one frame and not the other.
Can confirm, it's right.
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
Cheers, and g'nite!
>A shaved one just looks ugly and is meant to be used and seen often, meaning that it's a clear sign of whoredom.
>Star in 19th Century Porno photo.
>yfw you about to nut but have to hold it for exposure times.
Don't show this to /pol/ plis.
You can say it doesn't look obscene, but knowing Wilde there's something filthy in this photo that's hard to notice.
>But user if you are a pedo why do you like bush?
It's almost like people can have many different fetish/perversions
Women have been exhibitionsit camwhores from ever. That's their nature.
>For the record, I'm one of those autists who are only interested in Veeky Forums tier erotic fantasies. Modern sex is utterly meaningless and if it weren't for Japan I'd be asexual or some other kind of weirdo.
kill yourself faggot
>there's something filthy in this photo that's hard to notice.
what is it?
Well if you can't even point it out then why even post it?
This is a Christian board after all.
I get bush, it's really attractive to see some hair but armpits? What the hell man.
I made my gf grow a bush. It's so hot
>made my gf grow a bush
worth, can confirm
I can always tell when my sisters dating someone, she shaves her pubes. Right now for instance she's single.
>I can always tell when my sisters dating someone because she shaves her pubes
How do you know the state of your sisters pubes?
She sometimes skinny dips when we go swimming at the lake or at some springs. Usually we go several times a year and she's very nonchalant about her nudity with people she knows.
>Everybody depicted in these photos is dead
>Even fucking hotter
As seen in Django Unchained
youtube.com
You must be 18+ to post on this site user
Shit, you could probably make a cross-eyed version with these two pictures
Die kleinen Gefahren (1910 German Porn): pornhub.com
Why would /pol/ be upset about the standard procedure of depicting mediterranian men as tanned? Or did you think that was a dindu? Because if you aren't aware those two people, the whore and the guy, are white. It's just that the dude works and lives in the sun. He could be a soldier, or a field worker, or any and all things of that sort.
Do you honestly think that say Crassus or Pompey were black? Or Cezar? Because each of them definitely got a tan during their adventures in places like Egypt and Parthia. They'd have that skintone before returning to a milder climate.
You are convinced that you know but you do not, and that's the dangerous bit. You can't even see with your own eyes - that guy on the Pompeii wall clearly doesn't have negroid facial features.
Thank you, dear user!
Man, check out this slack-jawed faggot
> this entire thread
>CP
>not prefering the patrician pleasure of watching dressed qts
>I can always tell when my sisters dating someone, she shaves her pubes. Right now for instance she's single.
:P
So when did people become good looking?
imgur.com
imgur.com
imgur.com
I did not compile these albums, all thanks to the user who did.
>So when did people become good looking?
The chicks in these oldy timey photographs were street walking hookers, not professional models like today.
Until Playboy became a thing, almost all the chicks in porno pics/vids were uggos.
Holy shit man. I just said that /pol/ would go nuts if they saw that image nothing more.
he looks so unfazed
BBRRAAAAAAPPPPPPP
>an important factor in giving a stronger orgasm
Is it me or maybe all the women in this old nudes looks very ugly
He did.
...