ITT:

Not everyone is American you fat cunt.
Why the hell should le indian meme condemn us to follow you into the grave?

Whites are under assault by socialist zealots and their fellow travelers.
Who all consider themselves 'world citizens' or some milky, babyish shit like that.

how is he allowed to have kids by the way? I mean they probably don't even go to school

And vice versa. You’re just having a conniption fit about being “attacked ;w;” because for the first time in three hundred years you are going to lose.

When did someone need permission to have kids?

>whites are replacing the populations of non-white regions :)
'no'

Europe sent over their retards

Euronymous wearing crop tops was indeed disgusting

>Whites are under aussalt by (((themselves))).

They aren't currently, they have done so in very recent history.

And Europe belongs to the whites. Time to face the facts. Unlike the Amerindians, we have been here for 20,000 years

>this thing that happened in the past was bad, but it's good now that it's happening to you
thanks for admitting your racism

You diseased bastards colonized our countries and raped our ancestors for centuries, and you’re upset about what? That you saw a Mexican once?
If you’re so worried about the white plight I encourage you to kill yourself.

*casually ignores all the European nations that never colonised anyone that are now becoming minority European via rent seeking shitskin leeches that shit out their young*

>You
'no'

literally did nothing right

Oof

America belongs to anyone who can take it and hold it, just because the Amerindians wandered into the Americas doesn't mean they have any moral stake to it. If the Whites end up holding on to it so be it, if the Mestizos end up getting one over the Whites and take it over so be it.

>Mang I ain’t be responsible fo colonizashun n shiet da jooz did dis
>Muhfuggin darkie i is be yo conquerer n shiet we wuz

>Listening to a welfare parasite who burned down a church and is a murderer
>Also takes advantage of autistic french QT

>you

Cease this antisemitism immediately

persons born in 1990 are not responsible for european colonialism of the 1500s and later

>I molest children
That is disgusting, user and you should stop.

So easy to tell who has never read a word he's published or watched a single one of his videos in good faith
They just regurgitate talking points they heard elsewhere, for example "he's on welfare" despite him racking in well above the earning bracket to qualify for welfare from youtube, publishing, royalties, films, documentaries, books, blogs, webstore, (unrequested) donations, cheap lifestyle, inheritance etc

If you're going to attack him, attack his ideas, and try not to reveal just how much of a brainlet sheep you are

do you or do you not believe demographic replacement in europe justified by historical cases of european colonialism?

>Larping as a shitskin as thread derailment bait
never change Veeky Forums

>this is what collectivist ideologies believe
The day somebody tells me whether I can or cannot have kids and what I can do with them is the day I take my gun and go rek some shit, don't ever step on snek or you'll face the consequences, bitchboi.

I believe there is a current trend of "whites" (however you want to define that this week) being a smaller majority in Europe than they are currently, this is happening, whether it is "justified" or not is childish and subjective and I have no opinion on it. Whether this trend will continue or not is unknown. In 100 years time the world will seem even more different to its human inhabitants than you looking back on 1918.

Also you haven't explained why you think it is cool to fuck kids in the ass.

your parents shouldn't have had permission desu

It wasn’t bad or good, it just happened. Whites are the ones assigning value judgements and going into hysterics over being treated in the same way they’ve historically behaved. Your bloodline will be co-opted by culturally dissimilar brown people, and that is your fault. Whites are a sad, pathetic little people.

>plunderer who burned down a church and murdered his enemy
>takes advantage of autistic french QT
Tbf his living like a barbarian is more honest than any of us could admit

I share his anti modernism and pro nature tradition sentiment, but I disagree about the rest.

What? Are you high?

>this is acceptable in a modern society

>whether it is "justified" or not is childish and subjective and I have no opinion on it
oh, so you won't mind if someone tries to stop it, then. that's good
>Whether this trend will continue or not is unknown
unless black africans and islamic immigrants suddenly decide to stop having children, the safe bet is that the trend will continue

>oh, so you won't mind if someone tries to stop it, then. that's good
It depends what you mean. I am a strong supporter of controlled levels of immigration. Hurling abuse at people that don't fit your personal definition of white I am less cool with.

>unless black africans and islamic immigrants suddenly decide to stop having children, the safe bet is that the trend will continue
That's why I am a strong supporter of economic aid to Africa, there is only one thing in the whole of human history that has been shown to curb high levels of childbirth and that is economic development.

>It depends what you mean
oh, so you do have an opinion and aren't an amoralist after all
>That's why I am a strong supporter of economic aid to Africa
which sadly isn't going to happen. it also does nothing about the immigrants already in europe

>oh, so you do have an opinion
The thing I said I had no opinion on was whether current immigration was "justified" by colonialism. I didn't at any point say I didn't have an opinion on anything.

>which sadly isn't going to happen. it also does nothing about the immigrants already in europe
What's the problem with that?

He has a good vid on the roman salute

So you agree with America belonging to Amerindians the same as europe belongs to europeans?
So you agree with european replacement?

>The thing I said I had no opinion on was whether current immigration was "justified" by colonialism
so you're an amoralist on one question but not on others. ok
>What's the problem with that?
they outbreed the indigenous population and their cultures are alien, offensive and incongruous with the established indigenous culture, and often outright incompatible. london is no longer an english city, paris is no longer a french city, and other european cities are in similar straits. that's the problem

hello friends VARG THE BOGAN here!
ok so what we have today... oh yeah well white world is DOOMED. solution? escape to forests. yes there is no internet, electricity or toilets. but it doesn't matters because we are going BACK TO OUR ROOTS. also don't forget to reproduce, so make sure to bang your gf 10 times on daily basis. yes, there's no school in forests but it doesn't matters because we are going back to our roots you dumb fag. praise odin 14/88
also my dog just ate a cat

>so you're an amoralist on one question but not on others. ok
I didn't claim to be amoral on anything.

>they outbreed the indigenous population and their cultures are alien
Current European culture would seem alien to someone living 50 years ago and the birthrate of immigrants is large in the first generation and then rapidly declines to level of the host country.

Whites are such a large, heterogeneous group that they've lost or won various conflicts from the past 300 years.

I'm a Roman Catholic Mediterraneanist but varg doesn't really bother me if wants to live out in the woods, have children and express his opinions. I don't really feel like society needs to be micromanaged down to the individual.

>I didn't claim to be amoral on anything.
ok, but by making the "justified is subjective" argument you imply yourself an agnostic on the question of right and wrong
>Current European culture would seem alien to someone living 50 years ago
it would seem less alien were there not such a visible non-europeans presence
>the birthrate of immigrants is large in the first generation and then rapidly declines to level of the host country.
yet their presence is still profoundly noticeable and tangible. their cultural and societal impact is greater than their numbers, because their cultures, religious behaviours, languages, dress, mannerisms and appearances are so different from the host country's

>ok, but by making the "justified is subjective" argument you imply yourself an agnostic on the question of right and wrong
You're making wild extrapolations. A volcano may erupt tomorrow and kill 100 million people and I would think asking questions on whether the movement of tectonic plates is "justified" as a silly question. That wouldn't mean my general position on every question is that I am amoral and there is no such thing as right and wrong.

>it would seem less alien were there not such a visible non-europeans presence
Why 'visible", my black friends and nominally Muslim friends seem considerably more "British" to me (I'm a Brit btw) than someone than just turned up from Poland (not that I have a problem with Poles either).

>yet their presence is still profoundly noticeable and tangible. their cultural and societal impact is greater than their numbers, because their cultures, religious behaviours, languages, dress, mannerisms and appearances are so different from the host country's
Oh right, so if you turned up in 1950 in trackies and a hoodie using a magic device in your pocket to communicate with people around the world do you think they would consider that "alien"?

>So you agree with european replacement?

Well might makes right, Europe is in a tight spot but to be honest its ok since its Germans and Swedes who are really only getting the full extent of the halal anal fisting, even then I wouldn't put them out for the count. Europe has seen crazier comebacks in shittier situations before

>the movement of tectonic plates is "justified" as a silly question
indeed, as the movement of those plates is not a human action. unlike immigration and settlement, and reactions to them
>Why 'visible"
because non-europeans have obviously different phenotypes from those of most indigenous europeans
>Oh right, so if you turned up in 1950 in trackies
so, if an englishman walks down a london street in his neighbourhood and sees shop signs and advertisements written in urdu or indic script; women wearing various veils; beared, moustacheless men wearing pyjamas and skullcaps; large mosques, complete with minarets and speakers blasting the call to prayer; that he must change his behaviour to please these uninvited foreigners, lest he risk offending their sensibilities; you think he won't notice these things? that his city is now a foreign country? people are noticing, and a lot of them don't like what's happening, and can see where it's headed if not something isn't done about it

Southern europeans are negro mongrels

>replacing white people is ok because they did it 300 years ago

Convicts and muslims treat you like shit if you are nice to them.

>hurrr white people are so special obviously Jews and brown people agree and realistically spend everyday life plotting to defeat us

People generally think of themselves as Indian or Mexican or han Chinese or whatever dude. Nobody sits around calling themselves non-white except in reference to white people, not anynore than you primarily identify as non-asian or non-eskimo.

And mongrels and non-whites living in 2100 won't be responsible for what the past generations did before that time.

Accept our superiority.

>welfare
he doesn't get welfare, he just doesn't pay income tax cause of all his kids

Could he be correct in that Europeans are directly descended from neanderthals? He claimed in his video that the "4% neanderthal in Europeans thing" is a myth, both because the neanderthal DNA used for comparison is from a mixed specimen, and it's still a misinterpretation of the presented facts.

>autistic people are the real supermen