Europeans have nothing to do with Scythians, study finds

>Genomic inference reveals that Scythians in the east and the west of the steppe zone can best be described as a mixture of Yamnaya-related ancestry and an East Asian component

source: nature.com/articles/ncomms14615


Scythians were genetically my ancestors. Uzbeks are the descendants of Scythians. Pic related, colored markers are Scythian and Sarmatian samples. Scythians are just like between West Eurasians and East Eurasians just like us.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=STPb3OzCWl4
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

and guess who's between Asians and Iranians?

Us. Uzbeks. Just like Scythians.

Now will you Europeans stop LARPing as my ancestors? They were NOT white. Don't depict them as white, blonde haired and blue eyed in your meme history books.

yes they were

>muh haplos

useless shit.

Most Scythians had only as much Siberian admixture as Finns and NW Russians

>Genomic inference reveals that Scythians in the east and the west of the steppe zone can best be described as a mixture of Yamnaya-related ancestry and an East Asian component

retard

Most were similar to Early_Sarmatian_IA in OP who was European with minor Siberian admixture

>minor
>highest mongoloid is around 90% and lowest is around 20%

learn mathematics pale skin

>PCA of ancient individuals (according colours see legend) projected on modern individuals of the Human Origins dataset (grey). Iron Age Scythians are shown in black; CHG, Caucasus hunter-gatherer; LNBA, late Neolithic/Bronze Age; MN, middle Neolithic; EHG, eastern European hunter-gatherer; LBK_EN, early Neolithic Linearbandkeramik; HG, hunter-gatherer; EBA, early Bronze Age; IA, Iron Age; LBA, late Bronze Age; WHG, western hunter-gatherer.

science>wh*Tes

Based scientists BTFO'ing the whito pigus

youtube.com/watch?v=STPb3OzCWl4

didnt the greeks say they were blondes?

or was it the sarmatians?

>haplos
>y-chromosome
Your mongoloid women were literally slaves to the big IE dick

...

you know, there were Scythians in Ukraine as well, right?

...

...

Scythians in central Asia were not the same people as Scythians in Eastern Europe, they've only been considered the same because Greek retards labeled every steppe nomad a "Scythian", similarly how Greeks referred to every nigger as "Ethiopian", even non-Ethiopians.
The Scythians in the Ukraine and the Balkans were pretty much white, the Xiongnu/Ordos were pretty much Asian and the ones in central Asia were pretty much mongrels.

Damn you’re really triggered. Is it because the white man stole your nation’s one and only claim to relevance?

>Numbers refer to the defined groups (#): WEST: #1 initial Scythian period eighth to sixth century BCE (n=4); #2 classic Scythian phase sixth to second century BCE (n=19); #3 Early Sarmatians fifth to second century BCE (n=11); EAST: #4 Zevakino-Chilikta phase ninth to seventh century BCE (n=11); #5 Aldy Bel culture seventh to sixth century BCE (n=15); #6 Pazyryk culture fourth to third century BCE (n=71); #7 Tagar/Tes culture eighth century BCE—first century CE (n=16); arrows with a G indicate samples for which genomic data was obtained, black for capture data and grey for shotgun data. Source of the map: cartomedia-Karlsruhe.

You're a turk, get over it. Pan-Turanism is asscancer.

>Xiongnu were Scythian
Iranics were only really represented in their early ruling elite, the Yuezhi.

>early scythians 600-200BC had more asian like DNA
>still BLEACHED with some Yamnaya (Indo-Europeans, in case you weren't aware, whose most similar desndant today is Norwegians)
>speak Indo European language
>fast forward 300 years
>Early Sarmatian 100-400 AD is nearly completely Yamnaya, clusters with Finns and Russians
>Still speaks same language
You realize the story this tells us is that your Scythian mudbloods got conquered by Aryan people and nearly genetically wiped out by that superior race, right?

Whoops forgot pic related
>it's from the same study

You missed the point pretty hard.

The absolute state of larpers coopting white culture

you don't have a point, you're just calling iron age central Asians that the Greeks called Scythians and described as having blue eyes and red/blonde hair mongrels and thinking you have a point.

And to be fair, pretty much every black person the Greeks would have realistically met with any regularity would have been Ethiopian.

>Scythians in central Asia were not the same people as Scythians
they were clearly of the same culture and origin.

Why is Romanian so separated?

Make a wild guess

Yam aus and PIEs were dark haired, dark eyed and swarthy though.

>And to be fair, pretty much every black person the Greeks would have realistically met with any regularity would have been Ethiopian.
Not true at all lmao. Greeks were familiar with blacks but there wasn't much contact with modern day Ethiopia that I know of. Modern Ethiopia didn't start becoming a major player in trade and such until the 1st century AD.

EHG men had light skin, lighter hair than anyone else and fairly dark eyes. CHG women had most of these traits as well to some extent except probably not much light hair unless red.

fuck wh*Tes they're stealing Black Türk history

Scythians were Turkic

>swarthy
they were lighter than modern day Greeks, and they aren't swarthy.

Yamna weren't the only PIE group, they represent a sample of late-PIE. Stop spreading disinfo.

wrong they were Iranic
this is common knowledge and shouldn't be controversial
braindeads can't into chronology and temporally misplace the Turkic expansion while simultaneously misrepresenting genetic studies

>mongrels can't have blue eyes

where did I imply that? A large proportion of those people you call mongrels clearly did have blue eyes.

Everyone is a mongrel. This racist nonsense should just die. In fact, it's unlikely that "pure" Indo-Europeans would have blue eyes.

>CHG women
And men considering the Karelian EHG had Y-DNA J.

You're the one posting pictures of black infants in a thread on the Scythians and then bitching about the fact that race exists while thinking you have an argument.
>it's unlikely that "pure" Indo-Europeans would have blue eyes

you're clearly just a shitposting moron.

Those guys weren't directly connected to IE and for all we know they were in Eastern Europe before R1 even showed up.

OP is an hero and buttbtfo retarded rapebaby
sad turkroachfag is sad

EHG in general were quite "diverse". R1a, J, Q1a, R1b...

Literally all Yamna and the majority of Corded Ware had brown eyes.

>Yamna
not IE proper
>majority of Corded Ware
not surprising, a majority of Europeans to this day have brown eyes
still, I'm inclined to doubt that's really accurate considering it was a Corded eastward migration that most likely brought the trait into Central Asia

they certainly had more people with blue eyes than pretty much everyone else in the world at that time

Lmao no one actually cares