So a big talking point to explain differences in achievement gaps for black people is past inequalities...

>Jim Crow Laws and Slaver made me have a smaller frontal lobe
t. negroids

>muh /leftypol/
don't turn accusing anons of being from /leftypol/ into the new accusing anons of being from /pol/ please.

that isn't legit scientific proof by any measure, for a start shanyqua could just be tilting her head back slightly, also skull shape can be influenced by things besides the brain

>wouldn't the best one

What's the matter, bigot? Too white for you?

>also skull shape can be influenced by things besides the brain
yes but skull shape ultimately affects the size and shape the brain will be

...

Damn

Many objects have entered your mother's pussy and affected its size and shape, that doesn't necessarily mean giant flubbery nigger cocks are responsible for it gaping so, your birthing for example had quite an effect, also the very large dildos she is fond of.

If you wish to discuss the logic of this further please continue to use your mother's vagina as an analogy since this is the wavelength we are on now.

it was clearly laws from the 1960s and slavery that made my mom's vagina like that

If I'm going black, I want BLACK black. What's even the point of black on white when she's that light?

...

In fairness she doesn't look as attracive in OP's pic

Hair could be better

And the bikini doesn't look good on her in OP's.

The blackest one is still my favorite
Although "blackest" might be misleading, she looks like a native american mix.

Where do you get native american from?

Give them time it's barely been one generation

>black people are negatively affected by the past situations of their population
>black people were doing just fine in Africa in their mud huts until the evil wipeepol showed up
???????

delete dis we wuz kangz

Top cringe

it's been thousands of generations in Africa and nothing has changed

Post your hair and eye color. Most alt right are sub human demiraces

light brown hair and green eyes

Show pictures mutt. You dont want to look like a larper in front of all these nice folks do you?

this is actually true. Only in the past few years have there been any major cultural icons of black people in America that have begun preaching a message of positive change through financial and educational self-determination (literally fucking JayZ and Kendrick).
Meanwhile black 'Intellectuals' have done little more than pander to plantation socialism.

FBI please, I'm not showing you shit
but you can have this

You cropped out the rest of the pic. What's the rest of your ancestry? It's Jew isn't it?

That’s a multi part answer that I will answer to the best of my ability and hope this isn’t pol bait. It comes in two sections, wealthy and non wealthy. To wealthier blacks, slavery and Jim Crow didn’t have too much effect. White people would never treat them the same, but money could buy away most problems posed by the laws. The only other way out of poverty for an urban black in Jim Crow was a great education in the North. Thus in the modern day, the effects of Jim Crow are not felt on upper class blacks due to a great past education in their family helped them escape the lower social strata and money buys everything. So people like the Obamas and wealthy black entertainers are pretty insulated.

Jim Crow and slaverys effects are felt on the poor much more often. Why? Simply because it denied them opportunities afforded to others. They never got the same education whites did. They were never properly represented in government. They were kept as cheap laborers for jobs whites did not want to do. Now you might ask why this matters? Having previously educated family and community is a gradual thing that raises those around it. Same goes for wealth. Wealth buys better nutrition, and makes bette people. As for education, look at the Jews. They had a culture and religion that priotized literacy. As such, generations of learning has made them some of the highest IQ ethnic groups and awarded a huge share of nobel science prizes. Now see that slavery and Jim Crow was a concentrated effort to keep blacks poor and uneducated for as long as possible that barely ended 60 years ago. These missed opportunities do stack, and create the “lack of achievement” you perceive.

>inb4 what about Africa
Despite memes, Europeans built colonies to strip mine their Wealth as quickly as possible. They would never build industry in the colonies that could complete with their own at home.

I think that's why the kid born in 1990 to middle class was brought up

So it doesn't effect the wealthier black folks?

La bestia americana!!!!

this

>Jim Crow didn't affect the wealthier blacks
Jim Crow must not have had much of an effect at all if black people attained social mobility and financial self-determination despite living under it. And if that's the case, how can it have such a strong residual effect in the modern day when its no longer even institutional?

Why is it so hard for people to just admit that segregation, Jim Crow and the like were utterly brutal in the time they were active but don't fucking exist anymore? And far from being subsidied by current law and court structure, are actively undermined by it?

I don't think anybody claims Jim Crow is still around, but through vague voodoo magic that is never explained, it still hurts black folks.

>how can it have such a strong residual effect in the modern day when its no longer even institutional
It doesn't have any residual effect.
Also, virtually any European serf had it worse than blacks under Jim Crow and their descendants manage just fine. Jim Crow is just "first world problems" memed like it was some kind of horrid atrocity.

Only really ignorant SJW-types claim that Jim Crow literally continues to exist today. Many more toss the term around, which is irresponsible and false, but what can you expect from ideologues?

The point is, the legacy of those institutions continues to be felt in the continuation of relative poverty among African-Americans, even though the institutions themselves are gone.

>note measurable differences
>these go against our axiom of equality
>therefore there must be systemic causes
>throw every explanation you can at it

The less full of shit ones will talk up SES but it pails compared to heritibility

wouldn't, wouldn't, wouldn't, wouldn't

Jim Crow wasn't just first world shit, shit was fucked dude. In the South at least it wasn't just kept separate, but debasement at every level. Like lynching somebody and nobody going to jail for it. Hell, it was an afternoon picnic for the whole town at a lot of places.

>there were 4000 lynchings in ALL of American history, all races combined
That's fucking nothing.

So for the poor blacks it's the same struggles that effect the poor of every race? Cause I know of white folks that have been in poverty for generations.

Slavery doesn't affect the people today.

...

They actually tried to make it illegal in the 20s to lynch someone and Southerners in the Senate blocked it.

WHY?! WHY MUST YOU TORMENT ME SO WITH THESE JEZEBELS? All I want to do is come here for an asexual experience that will exercise my brain but I am constantly titillated by these vixens with their prodigious hips and provocative figures. Can I never satiate this thirst, will I ever know the touch of a woman and enter between her loins? Will my seed ever drip from her moistened hole?

Life is a constant hell. No wonder I resent women too.

eros.com/

Doesn't change what I said at all. You'd have a better chance getting hit by a lightning than getting lynched, and at least a significant percentage of the lynched were actual criminals.

REEEEEEEEEEEEEE

That was just one of numerous things wrong with Jim Crow. Schools were way underfunded. If you were black and a white person committed a crime against you, the chances of any restitution was next to zero. They would just look the other way, or do a show trial if they just couldn't bury it. And there were multiple times of black people just being driven off their property cause the white man wanted it. Just time and time again, full of race riots to drive black people out of town. Jim Crow wasn't just "You can't come in here nigger."

Well, there's a new thing called transportation now.

>So a big talking point to explain differences in achievement gaps for black people is past inequalities. Can someone please explain to me how shit like Jim Crow and slavery still effect people today?
Its most damaging effect is that it prevented many poor black families (especially rural ones) from escaping the cycle of poverty.
Large amounts of poor rural blacks moved to major northern cities in the early half of the 20th century (known as the Great Migration). They remained relatively prosperous, especially due to blue-collar manufacturing jobs. However, they didn't have many opportunities outside of that; redlining (where realtors would refuse to provide loans to people from certain neighborhoods, marked by red lines on their maps) meant that many blacks didn't have much of an opportunity to move elsewhere, pursue private higher education, or open their own business. Sure, your house might only be a rental in Paradise Valley or Englewood and you might only have a high school diploma, but you get paid well enough at the steel mill and you can make ends meet.
When American manufacturing took a nosedive in the 70s and the Steel Belt became the Rust Belt, urban black communities were among those hit the hardest. Jobs dried up, real estate values plummeted, and the future got bleak. Crime shot up, and with the drug crisis, drug use (which stops people from being productive) and incarceration rates (which shuts off many legal opportunities to advance) skyrocketed, and the cycle of poverty continued. Inner cities are still reeling from it today.

>How does shit like that effect a black kid born in 1990 to middle class parents? How did slavery and Jim Crow effect Sasha and Malia Obama?
For the most part, it doesn't (directly). Not every black family suffered the same fate; some were lucky enough to have access to higher education and/or secure well-paying jobs that didn't vanish in the recessions.

>The point is, the legacy of those institutions continues to be felt in the continuation of relative poverty among African-Americans, even though the institutions themselves are gone.
Thanks for completely ignoring the question. I'll restate it: if Jim Crow was so weak a system as to allow for blacks to gain social mobility in the first place, how can its residual effects possibly still be affecting blacks in America?

Well, there's an old thing called money for a while.

I think it depended on where you were at. Shit like Harlem in the 20s, a black man could rise up and get a lot of money. In Mississippi it would take a near act of God to rise up. Not only because of cycle of poverty can really fuck with anyone, but things like sharecropping, and having the entire state doing everything they can to keep black people in only menial jobs and never having any power.

I would have linked you backpage, but I don't think they do hookers anymore.

Nobody's arguing that Jim Crow wasn't more present in the South than in the North, but you're still fundamentally avoiding the question. Remember also that many Civil Rights leaders (most notably MLK) were born and rose to prominence in the South.

...

wouldn't, same, would, same (in all honesty I'm in no position to turn any down, but in an ideal world yeah)

...

She might be bright but you sure as hell aren't

And he was killed for it. Girls got blown up in Birmingham trying to kill Jim Crow. MLK could rise to prominence, but if he had stayed a pastor in his church, he would have probably just been lower middle class at best.

If you kids were smart enough to enter some kind of medical field and actually opened up cadavers, you'd quickly realize that the brain is the same shape across the board.

The fug, did I miss the memo when phrenology suddenly came back into vogue?

I didn't say anything about jews.
/pol/ in ya head rent free

Because of the systemic oppression. That's why they rose up.

The residual effects are still felt by black America because A. It's intent was to suppress and sabotage them, which is easiest to observe by the wealth disparity today. And I mean wealth, not being rich. Most (note the term. There are always exceptions) blacks simply could not build up a foundation for which their children could go farther than them in success.

Also Jim Crow never actually went away. The specific institutions and the name did but the spirit and intent survived quite well in a myriad of different forms from real estate agents manufacturing the situations to create white flight to fleece both and black people with fluctuating home prices to segregation, to individuals in power just being individually racist which had a cumulative effect.

Stopping at Jim Crow ignores the decades of context that came after.

"Centuries of slavery and generations of Jim Crowe did not destroy the black family, but one generation of the welfare state did."

Slavery literally destroyed black families.

It's all just slaves dividing up scraps according to a pecking order, arguing about the best way to divide up scraps. That's the failure of modern progressivism: to virtue-signal in the direction of freedom only to deliver a few additional crumbs. The story of history is the story of slavery, of the masters of the world tending to their flocks and commanding them. The masters changed uniforms from crowns, to military hats, and now to suits, the fundamental relationship between us and this alien species of homo superioris has not changed. In order to understand the world as it really is, you need to understand that you are a slave, that the rulers are the rich (all of them) and that you are in an existential battle for life with the rich. You will be disposed of once Homo Superioris uses you to construct their fully automated factories of perfect mechanical slaves. Our window of opportunity for preventing this future is closing quickly. The only hope is some method to powerfully viralize awareness of the slavery of humanity. A full multi-media assault is in order.

Really makes you think

They recovered though, they had to stick together during jim crow

LE CRINGE

these are all confirmed trannies

West-Africans have LARGER frontal lobes.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2964318/

>its systemic impression!
>actual institutions behind Jim Crow, Segregation, etc have been dismantled
>nearly every individual involved in those institutions is dead, dying or so old as to be irrelevant
>an entire generation of blacks have grown up AFTER the dismantling of those institutions and the fall from relevance of those individuals
>their shortcomings are still somehow the result of those institutions
Nani?

The 'decades of context' have been nearly unanimously held as a triumph of the new, liberal ideals against the old regime. Certainly this is an oversimplification, but the argument cannot be made that the black population didn't make massive social and legal gains since the Civil Rights era.
It's been a full generation since, and blacks have enjoyed an almost protected status for several years now, but people still snap to citing Jim Crow-era systems as the root of modern black shortcomings.

Nobody snaps to the Reconstruction era as the root cause of the modern failings of the American South, even if they're acutely aware of the generational impact Reconstruction had.

impressive tucking then

>blacks have enjoyed an almost protected status for several years now,

Nigger please.

there is no talking, Niggers have a subhuman Neuron count compared to people.

86 million Neurons average my ass, Niggers have 1/4rth the Neurons of whites.

>>How does shit like that effect a black kid born in 1990 to middle class parents? How did slavery and Jim Crow effect Sasha and Malia Obama?
>For the most part, it doesn't (directly). Not every black family suffered the same fate; some were lucky enough to have access to higher education and/or secure well-paying jobs that didn't vanish in the recessions.

I heard many African diplomats got treated like shit in America which caused a lot of problems for the US. One could say that only a certain level of wealth can ward off certain malign behavior to you and even then it isn't exactly reliable.

Jim Crow is dead. He has been for a while

It the principle that a developed nation actually blocked legislation banning extrjudicial killings/assault.

And Jim Crow has kids and many good friends.

>look Basil of Macedonia went from being a dirt eating peasant to a emporer in a generation, this means the Byzantine system of government is great.

Systems aren’t perfect. Some people escape, but not all. Notice how most wealthy blacks grew up in the North where Jim Crow wasn’t and received good educations. And it doesn’t exist anymore but if you keep a group of people down for centuries, don’t expect them to suddenly contribute a fuck ton to physics or something in 60 years.

Not really. Wealth solves a lot of issues user. Former clubs and schools who wouldn’t accept blacks before are always willing to change their mind with money. It’s just that wealth is often gained through a right set of circumstances and oppurtunities or education. Jim Crow and slavery Severly limited that to the point of being almost non existent (a few people making it doesn’t mean it was alright.) . I mean we are still going through civil rights issues today. I read an article about Florida schools the other day about how they haven’t desegregated fully.

...

The Civil war though did stunt the South for generations. The past effects the present you nog, that’s why we are here discussing history.

>blacks have enjoyed an almost protected status

Look, I get the whole black hate thing, but that’s not true. The war on drugs was practically invented and propagated to keep blacks down.

Please tell me how Jim Crow's friends had any influence on Obama being president, Condoleezza Rice being Sec of State, and Colin Powell being the top general. 40s America would have never allowed Ben Carson to run a surgical center and Herman Cain to be the CEO of a large chain.

And affirmative action was used to lift them up. Blacks get 230 points added to SAT scores, especially when applying to top schools.

archive.fo/RzJGZ

Except that's wrong

why are leftist memes so fucking awful?

>ITT: nigger apologists who use arguments of pseudo white privilege that fall apart after serious scrutiny