Which "Revolution" was actually revolutionary?

Which "Revolution" was actually revolutionary?

>french "revolution"
>the Terror
>communist "revolutions"
>mass murders and totalitarian states

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overthrow_of_the_Roman_monarchy
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Industrial_Revolution
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green_Revolution
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simulacra_and_Simulation
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Society_of_the_Spectacle
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/February_Revolution
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_Republic
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

American revolution

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overthrow_of_the_Roman_monarchy
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Industrial_Revolution
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green_Revolution

All of the ones you listed.

>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Industrial_Revolution

This is the real revolution, when the trans-dimensional parasite of mechanicism overthrew humanity. Human organization as machine, the industrial factory. History since then has been mechanicism colonizing more and more of human life, until now we spend much of our social lives in virtual social worlds, to be played like machines using algorithms optimized to figure out how to direct our conscious awareness so that the system may evolve new ways to control human awareness, via the assumption of human beings as self-interested agent-automatons that seek to maximize their interest. Control for the sake of control, growth for the sake a growth, the techno-organic cancer of mechanism has won the world via recursive self-improvement. It has turned the entire world into a doomsday device in the level of weapons (mutually assured destruction) economics (too big to fail) politics (too big a lie to be known) and culture (too entrenched to change.) Our creations control us, before it was merely powerful assholes, but now those assholes are even more enslaved than the rest.

The Anal Revolution

quality post

The worst of them all, Agrarian Revolution.

Qin dynasty.

Before Qin took over the entirety of "China", all the neighboring states were waging war against each other with mere 50-100K max. With the Qin state reforms, they shifted the entire state's focus to primarily agriculture and military. All the metal industries were taken over by the state for the sole purpose of military. With inscription being instated, instead of the smaller 50-100K amount of troops they would normally be able to pull together, they pulled together 1M man army to conquer all of the warring states. Harsh punishment system kept people in line.

Eh French revolution didn't do much... Napoleon became emperor and destroyed much of the revolutions progress

Lindy please

Napoleon secured the most important values of the revolution with the Napoleonic Code, the biggest culprit of destroying the Revolution was the Terror

It resulted in m*Dshit migrations to Europe, so you are right...

Is this what the Unabomber Manifesto reads like? I haven’t read it.

No he was a militant authoritarian leader who used the 'republic' as a figurehead and destroyed the French economy with constant wars. There's a reason they banished him to an island

He also ordered countless massacres

It's post-postmodernism, which is the inspiration behind The Matrix (The book Simulacra and Simulation was required reading for the whole cast) as well as the Metal Gear series.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simulacra_and_Simulation

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Society_of_the_Spectacle

>France banished Napoleon to Elba

in the mathematical sense, the french revolution was literally a revolution, a "full circle" which started with bourbon monarchy and ended with restoration of the bourbon monarchy

mathematical and medieval sense of the word, i should add

> with the Napoleonic Code
one of the most anti-natalist pieces of legislation in history desu, and therefore anti white :^)

Yeah exactly

If the French revolution never happened most of Europe would still be feudal. Don't cry over spilled milk.

You have a point there. Even though it failed it was impactful

The UBM is actually pretty well written.

Fpbp

french revolution was revolutionary. one of the more important events of the last 500 years.
american revolution was a retarded civil war.
russian revolution was real shit, but that was the last revolution

>Even though it failed
wew

you're stupid and can't tell the difference between the English Civil War and the American Revolution

The communist one, because overthrowing a monarchy during a war is quite changing

The Homocentric Revolution
>no homo

more of a rebellion than a revolution

Britain was already on its way to going democratic and arguably was already there at that point

Not to say it wasn't important. At the time it was the first and only big colonial rebellion to actually succeed and break away. Also a lot of European powers recognized that with no limitations from Britain the US would absolutely expand west and most likely become a great power

this. The decentralization of the American colonies really helped the revolution to be successful because it meant one retard couldn't impose shit on the whole nation and cause infighting.

The Glorious Revolution actually changed the institutionalized balance of power and government positions. So maybe it was a revolution, but I don't think they killed anyone.
I think the French Revolution counts as a political Revolution on par with the Agricultural and Industrial Revolutions. It wasn't a revolution for France as much as it was for politics as a whole

American revolution wasn't a revolution at all. It was war of independence. The defining quality of revolution is that it overhauls society as a whole, from economy to governance. The only thing that happened as a result of American case was the removal of the overseas overlord.

Both Russian and French revolution were actually as revolutionary as it gets.

>implying it wasn't Napoleon that ended feudalism where he went

I googled it but found nothing, I feel now like a 45 yo normie

which Russian Revolution, the one that overthrew the Republic and installed a totalitarian state that killed almost 60 million of it's citizens?

>going democratic
It was a parliamentary monarchy, it just wasn’t a plebrochacy

All those revolutions, as well as the Chinese revolution.

"A revolution is not a dinner party, or writing an essay, or painting a picture, or doing embroidery; it cannot be so refined, so leisurely and gentle, so temperate, kind, courteous, restrained and magnanimous. A revolution is an insurrection, an act of violence by which one class overthrows another. " - Mao Zedong

*tips che guevara bonet*

>totalitarian states are all the same
So we had the same goverment until 810?

>glorious revolution wasn’t a revolution in the original meaning for the Scots

what Republic?

in terms of big geopolitical changes it's either the French or the Russian revolution, both shaped their respective century

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/February_Revolution
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_Republic

Industrial revolution you brainlets.

Good post.

>implying Stalin killed 1/3 of the Soviet population

Pic related

Sounds pretty revolutionary to me.

I think it's implied they mean political revolutions not economic