Puh-lease tell me this isn't true

Exercise is the most conservative endeavor.
youtube.com/watch?v=GiVWLOTiw_k
There are no commies in the gym.

Hmmmm, could you be some sort of socialist nationalist?

>that
>gym bro

lmao dyel?

Lemme guess you're the "straight" one lol

>far, far left
>enjoy working out
And not in a cringey "muh swole left" way. The author probably got ignored/dumped by one too many good looking dudes and went all sour grapes.

That's why you have to be strong, to carry the weight of everyone else.

Really activates my almonds.

>you need to be strong to carry them

No you need to be strong to control them and keep them in line

>CHAD wouldn't fuck me, here's why he's an asshole

Control is too much work and personal micromanagement, best to just dead lift everyone's problems.

>n=171 students from a UK university who were paid $5
>Ethnically the sample was 51% White, 25% Asian or Asian British, 11% Black or Black British, 6% mixed, and 6% other.
>We measured subjective wealth by asking participants to fill in the blank in the item “My family is wealthier than ____% of other families in my society”.
>Raters were recruited via MTurk and were compensated $0.25 for their time; most took 5–6min to rate the 60 faces.
>Raters were 57% male; ethnically they were 83% white/Caucasian and 17% black/African American, Hispanic/Latino, Asian, or other; and their mean age was 34.19years
>When SDO was the outcome variable and bodily formidability was entered as the first predictor, no other single predictor (from the set of the four facial variables, waist-chest ratio, and time in gym) could be added to explain additional significant variance in SDO. When support for redistribution was the outcome variable and time in gym was entered as the first predictor, no other single predictor (from the set of the four facial variables, waist-chest ratio, and bodily formidability) could be added to explain additional significant variance in support for redistribution.
Literally a piece of garbage study and that's only halfway in. What even is sampling bias?

>mfw voted for Johnson

We /pol/ now?

>88
Answered your own question.

I've been center left for all my life, but I'm about to just start telling people I'm a Republican because these people disgust me so much

>republican
>right-wing

You care about the environment and the condition it is in, you don't like conservative money-based decision making, you dislike the American prison system, you think drug possession should be decriminalized, you don't want (usually conservative) politicians making decisions on your own life based off their own morality. Those are my reasons at least.

Then again this is just a /pol/ bait thread so I probably shouldn't even be responding

pt.2 because I couldnt just leave it
> time in gym was not a significant predictor in either model, and bodily formidability remained the only significant predictor in each model
>First, as expected, bodily formidability did relate negatively to sociopolitical egalitarianism.
> As noted above, these formidability-egalitarianism relationships could be the result of men calibrating their egalitarianism to their own formidability, or alternatively could be due to increased muscularity-striving among less-egalitarian men, or to egalitarianism and muscularity-striving both depending on a third variable. Therefore we checked whether relationships between bodily formidability and egalitarianism would remain significant, after controlling for the effects of time spent in gym on egalitarianism, and we found that they did remain significant in the case of SDO, but not in the case of support for redistribution.
^who the fuck signed off on this projection? they dont even reference why they think that might be the cause.
>In our previous studies on male formidability, we have noticed informally that participants tend to express a keen interest in how their measurements compare to those of other men in the sample, which led us to expect that participants in the current study would be strongly curious about this information. However, a limitation of this study was its lack of a manipulation check (e.g. a measure of self-perceived formidability), which reduces our insight into manipulation effectiveness.
>These relationships have not always been found—for example, Price et al., 2015 found no significant relationship between egalitarianism and bodily formidability, and the current study found no significant relationship between egalitarianism and bodily attractiveness. Nevertheless, when significant relationships between bodily attractiveness/formidability and egalitarianism have been found in men, they have usually been negative.
babbys 1st studie

>"Someshit KALE" african-jew scum
>Shitload of makeup
>bulldog face
>9:04 AM
>Whore writng in exercise segment that mans are assholes.

Exercising is even more natural than cleaning teeth or getting your hair clean it's like taking a shit, sleeping or eating food. This "post" is hillarious as fuck and idiotic.

Power sports was popular as fuck in USSR. Gyms are more popular today because now we got less avalible time and you can listen to your Ipod music you like and dont need those rules, teams and points to keep shit interesting.

I remember there being a study that correlated testosterone with right wing values.

...

literal nazi that lifts here, can confirm

See the dumb thing about furthering mindsets like this is it'll just make people WANT to be right wing.

When you portray the right as ultra-testosteroned 80s action movie stars with 12 pack abs dudes would want to be that compared to some limp dick faggot at an antifa ralley. Of course, if you do something like that pol ball where, "When white women don't want to fuck you so you call it genocide" you make people want to reel away from it. You're retarded if you're trying to shame people for being masculine when the majority of men are going to WANT to be masculine.

>People that believe you need to work hard to achieve things

yeah, it's true.

It's true alright

>Tfw right wing asshole
>Tfw voted for Drumpf
>Tfw guns
>Tfw Veeky Forums
Feels great m8

/lgbt/ and /pol/ just goes to prove that you're wrong

I'm all about right winging it.

Problem with the United States is the republicans here aren't really about politics they're about circle jerking around petty bullshit like sexuality, who can go into which bathroom, abortion and shit like that.

Rights to the states, and a free market are the a distant afterthought.

I wish they'd spend less time with their heads up their ass denying climate change and more time adhering to conservative values.

Right Wing Douchebro standing by

pt. 3
>time in gym not a predictor but muscle size is
>how u getting these big muscles if you aint in the gym
>gym bros
>implying that right wing assholes more likely to go to the gym
>implying that gym goers more likely to be right wing assholes
>implying 171 students in the UK are statistically significant when extrapolated to 200 million voting Americans
>implying that egalitarianism and wealth distribution are exclusive to the far right
>implying that "gym bros" were among the 171 sampled
>measuring muscle size relative to other participants and not the population
>curlbros with 14 inch biceps leading the pack
fuck me mang, too many degree mills pumping out awful "journalists" (read:bloggers) and awful studies

>I agree with funding the abortions (mistakes) of others at no benefits for me
>I agree with giving my money to niggers to sell their weed and drugs on their neighbohoods
>I agree with subsidizing the lives and homes of people who are utter failures and net negatives to society and will never be anything better
>I'm OK with paying boogie's bills
P A Y
A
Y

Insecure people are more afraid and therefore more conservative. Makes sense.

>people having abortions doesn't massively benefit society as a whole

well proven

I'm OK with subsidizing niggers. That's it.

Right-Wing? I'll grant that, but they're probably closer to centrists in that gym bros probably aren't as political as your average skinnyfat faggot. I'd argue that more gym-oriented people tend not to be politically extreme, one reason being they're less prone to having complex debates or spending a lot of time arguing.

/pol/tards are not gymbros, though. They're far right, and at best skeletons, but more often than not doughy weird looking losers. That comes with being overly obsessed with their persecution complex and blaming everything on the government, jews etc. They're in the same category as the far left in that they spend all of their time whining and making up excuses for why everything is shit than working on self-improvement.

So while gym bros are more right-wing than the general population, they aren't far right like /pol/ in my experience.

You spelt "euthanizing" wrong

Meanwhile the right win press spun it as "Weak men more likely to be liberal". Rise above, Veeky Forums focus on gains.

Shhh!

>Not caring about the environment is right-wing
>liking the American prison system is right-wing

You can smell the American ignorance off this post

KEK, lefties are too busy having aneurysms over fat shaming and promoting "body positivity"

>/pol/tards are not gymbros

Your newfag is showing. Most of /pol/'s posters start on other boards before eventually landing there, and Veeky Forums is one of the main starting points.

"Nerdy" kids in their mid to late teens come to Veeky Forums looking to get ini touch with their masculinity. Once they've developed it a little, enough to start really getting curious about the world outside themselves, they wander over to /pol/, if only to giggle about how outrageous the shitposting is. Nature runs its course, the more serious posts start to stick, and by their early to mid 20's the poster is a full-blown /pol/lack.

Go to any Trump demonstration and find the group of obvious channners. You'll meet one or two turbo-autists who match the physical description you've given, and they will tell you they started in Gamergate and wound up in /pol/ from there. But the rest will look like they obviously lift, and every single one of them will tell you the story above is the way they turned Right.

I work hard. I lift. I believe in self improvement. I know there are a lot of dumb people out there who are going to stay dumb and deserve the consequences of their dumb decisions.

But when you have a family member or child with a disability who can't communicate, feed/clothe himself, or function in the real world, and you wonder what would happen to him if you suddenly died in a car crash, you start to look at the social safety net differently.

I just feel like those children should be euthanized because why should they exist if they can't do anything

note that this is not a troll and i feel your child should have been forcibly euthanized and you banned from reproducing again. Sorry but we need to move on as a species. This includes barring reproduction of violent or unintelligent people as well

I can't fault you for you compassion. It's actually a nobel trait that embodies a strong person. But the reality is always more nuanced and the left exploits that.

Hey guys, someone please help me out here

There is a technique that she uses in her writing that I am trying to figure out what the technical term for it is

I'm asking because I see this all the time and I want to know the exact terminology for it so I can call people out on it

If I had to put it in my own words I would say "False accusation by association", meaning that she asserts her "thesis" by plugging WORD FLUFF next to her actual statments

Ok For example she says in the article:
>To all you gym-bro HATERS amongst us, come, be seated. This one's for you. Science—objective, empirically tested science, the science that tells us that the ice caps are melting—has confirmed what many of us have long suspected: Gym bros are right-wing JERKS.

It seems as though she could have written this exact sentence without the words that I capitalized but I think her tactic is that if she plugs in that negative word fluff she can associate right-wing with "jerks"

Another example:
>New research from Brunel University finds that physically strong men who regularly go to the gym are more likely to be right-wing and SUPPORT SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC INEQUALITY than weaker men.

Again, she could have just said "support right-wing views" but she had make the men seem like demons and plug her own language of "inequality"
What is this style of speaking/writing? Is it propaganda?

I was really far right and spending more time in the gym made me gayer no homo

>Your newfag is showing.

I've been on this website longer than you. I guarantee it.

>Most of /pol/'s posters start on other boards before eventually landing there, and Veeky Forums is one of the main starting points.

Except you're wrong, because that would be a minority. The vast majority are /v/, /tv/, and /r9k/ rejects. You know, fat dorks that spend all of their time shitposting on the internet. I know you want to pretend that all right wingers are super alpha chads, but they just aren't. I've been to right wing gatherings. It's generally about the same as the left. Some gymrats, some genuinely buff dudes, but mostly old dumpy faggots and skinny nerds. In a lot of cases, the posters on /pol/ are just NEETs that never leave their home, so the average poster there is actually probably worse than the people that show up to the real life rallies.

>Once they've developed it a little, enough to start really getting curious about the world outside themselves, they wander over to /pol/, if only to giggle about how outrageous the shitposting is. Nature runs its course, the more serious posts start to stick, and by their early to mid 20's the poster is a full-blown /pol/lack.

I know /pol/ loves to push this idea, but I genuinely doubt this actually happens very often. It's not like /pol/ is full of intelligent posting, it's just idiots with paranoid schizophrenia and low level fags that want to blame everything on jews and lefties.

>But the rest will look like they obviously lift, and every single one of them will tell you the story above is the way they turned Right.

Not buying it. My guess: you met one or two guys like this, they met your ideal of what you want "right-wing" to be, so you hold them as an example/as the majority because it seems to be a better image in your mind that will fit the narrative that the right wing is fit and strong, when the reality is the majority of /pol/ is probably overweight drug addicts.

pls just end yourself. the world will be better off without you

>people that work on improving themselves don't support free gibs 4 everyone
s h o c k e d

My sides

>Slapping on negative labels on people and things without any explanation or even acknowledging the necessity of explaining.

That's called name-calling.

Literally the post I came to make
RWDS4LIFE

>being alpha
>supporting liberals

Pick only one and if it's not the first one kill yourself.

I like how conservatism went full Objectivist and "we should be as much of a selfish dick to each other as possible because things like charity, healthcare, social security only help the weak."

I expect in the next 100 years it will become legal to euthanize your employees when they become unprofitable.

>This is what he actually believes that majority of his tax dollars are going too.

At least graduate highschool before trying to make an educated post.

Why do parents take care of their children? They're just leeches that don't contribute anything. They can't even feed themselves. Why are they propping up the weak?

The baby should be taken from the maternity ward and dropped off at the local job center where the free market will decide which babies are strong enough to survive and which die.

He didn't say that at all. But you're not even refuting his points but instead making what's called a straw man my man maybe you should go back to school and learn that this is unacceptable

found the lib-tard socialist

Hitler did nothing wrong

Reading an article by someone who looks like they probably think "cracking open a cold one with the boys" is rape culture. Her last name is also kale which is the gayest of all edible plants. She might be right.

>This much projecting

I literally told you to go out and meet people to see for yourself, and you responded with a bunch of insults that start with, "Nah, I bet..."

Slow your roll, child. That's not a good look.

Why do parents abandon their children when their 18? they conceived them, why dont they take responsibility over their actions and pamper dylan until he can find his true purpose

This

Learn economics beyond a purchase at a store, you idiot.

"a cold one" is a euphemism for a woman

>people think I got fit for girls
>tfw i got fit to look juicy in a SS style uniform when the time is right.

Lmao 22 year olds with Bachelor's degrees are having trouble finding full-time jobs so what makes parents think an 18 year old with no credit history is going to waltz off the high school graduation ceremony into a job that pays enough to afford rent and car insurance for an 18 year old, a landlord who will rent to a teenager with no credit history, and also if your parents didn't give you a car you need a car payment which requires, wait for it, credit approval.

Say you're kicked out at 18 with the clothes on your back. What comes first, the place to live or the job? How do you apply to a job without an address? Why would anyone rent to you without proof of income? Congratulations, your child is homeless. I bet those 18 years were worth it. What, what do you mean no grandkids?

What you're describing is called charity and doesn't require a socialist state

I think its pretty accurate considering the #swoleleft disappeared pretty fast.

>people more willing to work hard to improve themselves more likely to support political ideologies that reward individuals who work hard
hmm

it's amazinghow people seem to lack the perspective that when my dad was young in the 1970s he could literally walk into a machine shop or something and be like "teach me this job and give it to me" and they'd go "okay" and then he'd make the equivalent of 70k/y

america was truly an amazing white paradise from the 40s-80s. Today, there was a trannie in my bathroom at the gym, and then I saw two sets of gay dads, one with a black and a arab kid while both dads were white.

well said user.

lol not that guy but being left wing typically means you have fedoras somewhere in your house, some sort of japanese weapon, and frequent plebbit.

>What comes first, the place to live or the job?
If you have a vehicle, you have a safe place to sleep.
>How do you apply to a job without an address?
Enlist, temp, construction are the easy outs. And if you don't have a single person in your life who would be willing to let you use their address to apply for a job, or say you rented from them, or send your mail to while you were homeless, then just stick with those until ou get a place to stay

t. dyel cuck who wrote in bernie

Then give your money to old people

Also FAFSA uses your parents income to determine "expected family contribution" until age 24 even if your parents kick you out and disown you at 18.

The only way to get around it is to marry someone, in which case it uses your spouse's income.

I thought right-wingers want to help people but think that will be best accomplished by not punishing those who achieve a lot with taxes but rather empowering them to use the free market and their individual power to help those less fortunate within their specific communities

No we just want to be left alone and not have money taken to give to people who don't do shit except vote and campaign for liberals on Facebook everyday all day

oh. what about the people who really cant support themselves? mentally ill, physically disabled, war veterens, etc?

> science confirms

Well if science says so

Social Nationalism is the future

>absolutely massive

lol goes to show the level of body dysmorphia on Veeky Forums

a bunch of lazy shitstains don't share my genes

...

What part of don't take my shit from me did you not understand? How about you donate more to charity?

Christian fundamentalism poisoned the right wing in the US, it's doctrine does not follow their political leanings and makes anyone on the right look like a bible thumping retard. A religion predicated on taking pity on the meek huddled masses is not conducive to a successful society comprised of strong individuals. You cut the gangrenous flesh away from your society and you will succeed. Also, I am extremely skeptical of any desert religion written by Judaic goatfuckers.

C'mon mate. You know that's not even a comparable situation. A child is capable of learning to be independent and perhaps even make something of their life. A child is capable of contributing meaningfully to society. Raising a child is instilling values in them that will make them a productive member of society. A lazy drug addict has shown that they, despite being fully grown, are incapable of being anything but a burden. Wellfare leaches are bottom of the barrel scum, no amount of Frodoposting will change that.

...

>Stop being Christian
Honestly I'd be okay with being Varg, he's got a comfy house with kids and a loyal (although possibly autistic) wife. Maybe I'll move into the woods, seems so cozy.

>"Gym bros more likely to be right wing assholes"

Oh yeah that's not biased at all

So would most right wing people be ok if their tax money was used to help people that deserve it? Seems a lot of the hate for social security and welfare is that people will abuse the system. Could there be a way to evaluate people and give it to them only? It's pretty crazy how food stamps can be used to purchase random things..