Is there any truth to "bbc genetics" or is it just a meme?

I agree 100%. But It's a damn shame it made us less aesthetic. We need to genetically engineer our kids to perfect them so they can continue the Western tradition of dominating the entire world.

this. malnutrition has more of an affect on penis size than race

every black homemade porn video disagrees with this

1) selection bias, both in terms of who films and who watches the videos
2) look harder. there are tons of amateur black vids where the guy is 4-6''
and even if literally every porn vid with a black guy had him with 8'', that doesn't mean it's representative of the population. the average white guy in porn professionally is ~8'', same with black guys and latinos. does that mean all 3 groups average close to that? no. i'd sooner trust a team of urologists that study it professionally than some random user or bbc whore

1) homemade not professional, obviously professional is irrelevant regardless of race.
2) you should look harder, cases where a black guy has a small penis are conveniently relevant to you, but cases where it's big are selection bias and irrelevant.

you realize that the more beautiful someone is the more likely they are to have neanderthal genetics?

Ray Williams is the strongest power lifter alive. He's got the highest raw total in powerlifting history and the highest raw squat ever. Before you "muh strongman" remember nobody has ever squatted the amount of weight this black man has.

>2) you should look harder, cases where a black guy has a small penis are conveniently relevant to you, but cases where it's big are selection bias and irrelevant.
you're an idiot if you think that's what i was saying. i'm not talking about searching "little black cock" just to prove there are black dudes with small dicks, i'm talking about the fact that when i go into the amateur porn tab about 1 in 5 dudes are noticeably above average regardless of race, and the rest are within spitting distance of average regardless of race. i couldn't even tell you how many dicks i've seen in porn, but i guarantee you that you're either selectively remembering or only in the bbc tab.
when looking at amateur vids, the majority of black dudes are average, slightly above, or slightly below.
also, selection bias also has something to do with who posts the vids and not just those who watch. people with bigger than average dicks are more likely to get measured when they just randomly ask people or have open to the public data gathering and everyone is more likely to inflate their numbers when asked. same thing with porn, dudes with big dicks are more likely to post pics/vids around. on top of that, you have the additional bias of underendowed black men being insecure due to stereotypes and either removing themselves to near abstinence or end up being much more selective about sharing pics than bigger dudes.
literally every single study i've seen backs me up, and the only defenses i've seen in favor of this stereotype are either "muh bbc" shitposts or people with bbc fetishes defending their taste in men.

Everyone also forgets that Mark Henry was on track to do it, too, and the only reason he didn't is because he got bored with the sport.

>that wall of text
chill out, dicklet

not even a dicklet, just autistic

Oh, and he's probably also the widest person on the planet, across the shoulders.

god damn you're retarded beyond saying

>it's another episode of insecure white guys obsessing over black cock statistics

elaborate, my nigga.

Just a meme. They're quite average.

OP here, just to clarify i meant the whole BBC gains meme. whenever someone posts "is X attainable natty?" if its a black guy someone always mentions BBC genetics, implying blacks have some sort of physical / athletic superiority.

wasnt talking about their dicks lol...

BBC = big black cock

muscularity is easier to see when people are lean, and when skin is dark. black men in america have slightly higher test because they're more likely to be physically active, and two people of the exact same stats and insertions will look different depending on skin tone.
the reason why blacks seem naturally more muscular is the same reason why bodybuilders use bronzer and shit before going on stage. the skin makes the muscles pop more, das it

neanderthals where actually much smarter and stronger than homo sapiens, but hugely outnumbered.

get your fucking facts straight.

Cock size is a genetic lottery. The same goes for tits as well.

>tfw have a big dick but not this slut delusional big black dick.
Tired of all these sluts who just want me for my dick potential.

wait a second... the image has evolved from the original in pic related

your plot looks wrong. pretty sure the average dick is not 13cm

no, it means that 50% of people have a dick 13cm.
not that the average dick is 13cm

asking this on a place that obfuscates and abstracts truth with layers and layers irony. no it's not a meme. black people have big penises and i'm a cuck so i know what i'm talking about.

the one I posted is from that "UK size study" a few years ago (just by googling it you'll find it)... the other one is fake

there's no scientific proof for that claim though, so it's all in your head little cuckboy

Do you actually believe this shit?

Sumerian and ancient egypt proof that is bullshit

Only germanics are stupid enough to believe that shit

>black people have big penises and i'm a cuck so i know what i'm talking about.
to draw a conclusion like that you would need to see hundreds or thousands of penises. are you saying you have first hand experience with hundreds of black penises?

ancient egypts were "white" or rather greek/turkic by todays definition

It's somewhat am meme. Thing is, average testosterone levels dropped significantly in the western world during the last 100 years, not sure why but probably due to shitty nutrition. You see extremely skinny and weak ass looking blacks everywhere in the western world (jk, only the US and France).

The average test reduction is still valid though. If we could fix that, we would fix the modern man to a large degree.

dat glorious feel when had DNA tested and am in top 10% of Europeans in terms of Neanderthal DNA

thevintagenews.com/2017/02/15/researchers-find-genetic-proof-of-interbreeding-between-neanderthals-and-homo-sapiens/

There's a lot of research that supports the idea of interbreeding in the area depicted in sourced article. Google it, my man. It happened.

that rock is doesnt look heavy as a air conditioner unit. Its sad you losers think this is something special.

>3% average neanderthal dna admixture in europe
>neanderthal skulls look like a fucking chimp hybrid

No, sorry.
Europeans are descendants of cro magnons.

^^ this is how you know won the argument

>every black homemade porn video
you sound like a fun guy to know

thanks, i think?

Think about life in africa, great plains and high heat , chasing after food/persistence hunting except on a much larger scale than america

then slavery happened and they were quite literally bred to be the strongest, hardest working slaves possible

it's completely reasonable, imo

Destroyed

>heheh fuckin libcucks obsessed with the Big Black Cock. It's fake not real, everybodies penis is the same
>Fucking niggers and their genetic low IQ. How are libcucks denying people that evolved in different environments have different traits? Low IQ savages

the cognitive dissonance is too real

>Europeans
That isnt a race, you retard

BBC genetics is just a combination of retard strength and monkey strength

So who were sumerians?

Who were egyptians?

>they were quite literally bred to be the strongest, hardest working slaves possible
3 things:
1) check the pictures and descriptions of slaves. outside of their depictions in propaganda and modern media, they were malnourished and skinnyfat. they were used for repetitive manual labor, like shoveling, picking, cleaning, etc. that doesn't build a big physique, especially since they were given the scrap food
2) humans take 15-20 years in order to mature to the age of reproduction, and any significant changes in populations take longer than a handful of generations as a general rule. there simply wasn't enough time to breed the necessary amount of genetic freaks, plus whatever changes *may* have occurred would have likely been wiped away by now due to a large influx of blacks from other parts of the world that wouldn't have been the product of such selective pressure.
3) why the everloving fuck would a slave owner want a plantation full of jacked negroes, knowing that they've got a musket at best to defend themselves from a mob? it'd be too damn risky, because they'd be aware of their physical capabilities and numbers. even the staunchest of racists back then didn't think blacks were too stupid to plan a revolt.
i'm not feelin' the ownage, mate. try harder, i guess?

I was saying that I hate you won

>he thinks that evolution occurs within a couple hundred years

The ancient Egyptians were not black.

They werent and i didnt say they were

Im just saying that neanthental thing doesnt match up