When did China overtake the United States?

When did China overtake the United States?

Other urls found in this thread:

azquotes.com/quote/1176961
antonysutton.com/suttoninterview.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

>implying China would be colonizing the planet without the help of US and Nixon/R'feller since the 70s
Rockefeller/Nixon literally created superpower China and the US continued to transfer the wealth and future of the west to China
would china be what it is today solely based on china's abilities and without western transfer of wealth and technology?


US is China's greatest ally. if it was not for the US, China would still be a country based on subsistence farming.
US literally created superpower China...
Nixon/Rockefeller birthed superpower China and the US continued to transfer the wealth and future of the west to China
china would not be what it is today solely based on china's abilities and without western transfer of wealth and technology

China's rise was due to a transfer of wealth from the west.

>murica transfer of wealth/technology/industry to poor rural china
>murica create power strong china
>murica claim a strong china a problem
>murica plans on fighting strong china with totalitarian TTP eroding more citizen rights
>not creating a scapegoat to implement totalitarianism


the power brokers transferred:
-literally all the financial funds of US workers to China,
-transferred technology and jobs to China
-hyperinflated the housing so that only the Chinese (recipients of western funds) could afford the housing

the transfer of funds was done involuntarily without the consent of the owners of the funds
the power brokers took western funds sitting in banks and invested all of that in China.


all that wealth transfer was from your pockets. the private funds in bank accounts, the housing assets, the jobs, all transferred by corporate USA without your agreement...


By about the year 2000 Communist China will be a “superpower” built by American technology and skill
-Sutton 1980
azquotes.com/quote/1176961
antonysutton.com/suttoninterview.html

"America's Secret Establishment: An Introduction to the Order of Skull & Bones"

Did you really type this up in the 1 minute and 16 seconds after the OP was written?

>15:20:01
>15:21:16

OP is debating himself

When the US stopped being white

wtf i love ctrl+v now

It hasn't yet and likely won't.

There is a reason Ching Chongs spent 3,000 years growing rice and making some rock huts.

t. 56% amerimutt

Well memed, friendo

Realtalk: Chinese foreign policy is even more autistic than American foreign policy, and that's saying something.

As long as this remains the case, it won't be the US vs. PRC, it'll be the PRC vs the US, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, India, and whatever parts of NATO care enough to show up.

Stopped being white
Subverted by too many groups
Subverted groups reach power and encourage self-destructive behavior

China is national socialist and will destroy a Muttocracy with ease because an iron grip ethnostate is actually the better system.

You're just looking at it in terms of "which Pacific Rim members favor USA vs. China". I take it you don't know what Belt and Road is?

China's foreign policy is autistic in the genius way. Its all about pragmatism and long-term plans
US's foreign policy is autistic in a way thats borderline retarded. Ours is all about election cycle plans and nothing more.

China's foreign policy is about containing India, this is the real purpose of the "new silk road" but for however pragmatic it is, it's defeated by the PRC's stupid economic decisions that try to take over foreign markets through overproducing products using state subsidies, a thing everyone else has wised up to and is leading to sanctions. A process that even globalists agree is a problem see the (dead) TPP (now replaced by a much stronger protectionist stance out of Trump).

America's foreign policy is different, as that policy is literally being the world police and preventing conflicts from occurring between industrialized countries. This means confronting North Korea (a situation that exists due to a complete failure of Chinese policy in the region), trying to mediate disputes in the middle east and helping Ukraine amongst other things. It's been mostly successful until this point, the only major screw up is ISIS but even then they were never industrialized or posed an existential threat to the west.

It's two different goals, two different strategies. Comparing both of them directly does not work well.

>le democracy work every 4 years
If China dare to move 1 cm out of his borders all of his neighbours would join to the US, there is not a single country in the Far East that don't despise the Chinese with all of his soul

>If China dare to move 1 cm out of his borders all of his neighbours would join to the US
Funny, Flips are getting ultracucked and they're already in the US camp.

2014

It hasn't and it never will.

>mediate disputes in the Middle East
>mostly successful
Hmm I don't know about that

>China’s foreign policy is about containing India
Don’t flatter yourself Pajeet. Chinese leaders are focused on challenging American hegemony. You poo in loos are just after thoughts to the politburo.

5000 years ago

No because India has an active border conflict with China. As both are nuclear armed, this makes it a much higher priority than pissing off Americans in the Pacific Ocean.