Study English history

>Study English history
>Become Charles loyalist

Who else here?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/_SXf9-Z3jwk
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

This
The filthy Parliament should've been disbanded long ago

>loyalist
he was an ass who couldnt even implement his policies, and got BTFO by the scots for gods sake (still mad they werent cucked into the CoE desu). then he was more than willing to compromise with the nutjobs in parliament even handing over his actual supporters to the headsmens block, and only recanted when shit was too late.
that said between him and the zealous puritans id pick the royalists any day, id just ease him out of power afterwords

How does it feel to be a brainlet? Seriously? If we are to take your claim seriously, then we have to assume you must have been presented with the incontrovertible evidence of Charles' incompetence. If you still chose to be a loyalist after the case thus presented, there is only one conclusion to draw, OP- that you are a faggot, (fitting for a monarch whose father was a faggot)

Also his chief bishop Laud was a faggot too. Ironic that Laud was among the first killed in 1642, right OP?

Honestly, that's not as tenth as pathetic as studying history and winding up taking any side at all in a war that's been over for more than 350 years.

On the contrary, history wouldn't be history if it weren't about making judgements and taking sides. Otherwise it would be nothing more than chronologies or annals or medieval chronicles

President Thomas Fairfax WHEN

fuck c*omwell

Nonsense. History is about understanding how and why, not just what happened when. Taking sides strikes st the core of understanding; you'll naturally come up with ways to make your side look good and other sides look bad, distorting things in the process.

How and why involves placing "blame", even if that blame is just a key to understanding why historical processes happen. One can look at the English Civil War and show Charles was the leading cause of it, and that Charles' own actions were instrumental in his own demise. Also, as historians commonly demonstrate, our attempts to understand how and why, and more generally what questions we ask about history in general, are conditioned by the times in which we live.