How did the han chinese became so numerous?

They are the biggest ethnic group in the world by far. They are 18% of the population.
And don't tell me india, because they are divided to gujarati, punjabi and who knows what.

Anyways was it love of sex or what?
They multiplied like rabbits.

Regionalism is just as big in China as it is in India.
It's just not as prominent due to the logographic style of writing which masks regional differences of communication

I am starting to think it was the love of sex.

Fertile lands, warm climate, living by the river

That's applicable to many other places too.
It was the love of sex probably.

How did the American population become so big? Same thing, not in the immigration sense, but they just kept calling more and more people Han.

What do you mean?
I didn't understand your point?

Colonisation and assimilation.

The non-Han people that surrounded them were of a similar enough racial composition as to be easily integrated into the Han stratum once they were sinicized.

Turns out that people who live in similar places end up looking the same.

Had Rome existed in perpetuity we would probably group the people of Iberia, Gaul, Italy, and the Balkans into a common Roman ethnicity despite the regional variations in appearance. Ethnicity, after all, is more than genetics.

>find people a thousand miles away who look different, speak a different language, have a different religion, and have a different culture
>call them Han
literally it.

As table kingdom + lack of war. Compared to Europe, China can be considered as relatively peaceful.

What on earth is a " table kingdom"?.

>Compared to Europe, China can be considered as relatively peaceful.
No, not really, not at all. China was engaged in nearly constant conflicts with its neighbors, and whenever it descended into some kind of civil war fucking millions upon millions were killed.

Asians breed like rabbits

He meant stable, probably. Which is very wrong

>we would probably group the people of Iberia, Gaul, Italy, and the Balkans into a common Roman ethnicity
they were already doing that in late antiquity. The post-Roman ruling class of Franks, Ostrogoths, Lombards, etc, didn't refer to their subjects as Gauls, Iberians or Italians. They were simply Romans.

There is literally a sex shop every third street in beijing. I think its love of sex too.

Nah man it took thousands of years and mixing

Qt Asian grills

Just because most people are called "Han" on CCP statistics doesn't mean they're all truly the same stock.
It's as if England, Germany, Austria, Poland, the Netherlands and Scandinavia were emptied out into continental America and called "Saxons". Are they biologically different and with ultimately disparate origin states? Yes.
Is the difference meaningful, or even noticable, especially to an outsider? Probably not.

Regional differences were and are still minimized by top-down efforts from the state, in an effort to bind them all together.

1) The OG Han race occupying the most fertile and large as fuck real estate in all East Asia: the valleys between the two great rivers.
2) A culture that prided family growth above all else.
3) Speaking of Culture: """Han Chinese""" ultimately is more of a cultural identity. The fact that Classical Chinese civilization was considered the highest civilization in the region meant you had non-han people under Chinese rule calling themselves Han after centuries of acculturation.
4) Occupation of Southern China and what turned out to be a titanic rice producing region.
6) Yeah, obsession with sex. Really, there's a reason why Chinese Trad. Medicine is big on aphrodisiacs.

I think id be more akin to saying taking not just people from Northern Europe but all of Europe as well considering a Han Chinese can be everything from short and brown (like in Southern Europe) to tall and white (like in the North Europe)

Han identity is more of a cultural identity. Similar to a Roman identity. One that adopts the language/customs of the main middle China's identity. Whatever their original "cultural identity" maybe, are no longer valid, remembered, or known.

The process of Hanification is to dilute and destroy the local minorities through trade/pressure over time. This is still happening right now, as it has for the past thousands of years.

>China
>stable
>lack of war

You're a doofus. China has one of the most volatile histories in the world. China was anything but stable. If chinks weren't being raped and enslaved by horse nomads then they were going through massive devastating famines or rebellions or wars of unification the likes of which the world has never seen.

Don't forget the Yellow River on which the entire northern half of the civilization was based had a nasty tendency to flood and change its course every now and again and destroy everything around it. It's not nicknamed "China's Sorrow" for nothing.

Wrong