Why dont linkies give other projects like Etheroll and SALT a hard time for using a centralized oracle and in turn...

Why dont linkies give other projects like Etheroll and SALT a hard time for using a centralized oracle and in turn shilling LINK. I mean can you imagine the wojack fest if Oraclize gets compromised? All the bets in Etheroll and loans in SALT would be totally fucked.

Other urls found in this thread:

schneier.com/blog/archives/2017/03/using_intels_sg.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

I dont understand any of this

I mean most linkies just keep shilling chainlink's potential and muh SIBOS. When the best way to shill chainlink is to force other projects to use it.

>This is unacceptable. How dare you use a centralized oracle.
>What happens to our money when Oraclize gets compromised? How can you say that this casino/lending platform is decentralized when you're fucking using a centralized oracle

Get my point? Then the bagholders for those platforms would be like "shit the linkies are right" and they would demand the platforms to use LINK as well.

We don't want to get aggressive. Our product is so good.

But its tanking in price... the team hardly does any shilling. Anyway im just thinking of this as an outsider who might buy LINK during this dip.

if LINK fails literally no ICO will ever succeed again. dont u bitches get it. LINK is the only path forward for crypto. nothing else matters. you all better be praying for LINK to succeed or we're all screwed.

I hope link doesn't go up until after the fork, I still want to buy more but my coinbase card limit needs to fuck off first

yes

Seriously can you imagine how fucked up everything would be if Oraclize gets compromised? Even Twitter has employees going AWOL (deleted trumps account). The financial incentive to compromise Oraclize would be too huge.

Because I'm 75% LINK and 25% SALT, I believe both are solid projects.

What's your entry point?

Why is it so important? I'm a bit dumb

Because we already live
>rent free in your head
No need to shill this coin. Its a money time bomb just waiting to explode into our bank accounts.

Does "rent free in your head" mean that people are always thinking about LINK and therefor they live inside their heads without having to pay rent?

I always thought it was meant to be FUD and suggesting that LINK owners are seen as future homeless people.

Next to "decentralized currency" itself (i.e. Bitcoin); mainstream smart contracts are the second biggest thing crypto will likely every produce.

Chainlink is the first real solution to mainstream smart contracts, since it allows real-world data to communicate with the blockchain (and thus become trustless) in a decentralized manner.

Holy shit pls get hacked Oraclize

great idea to make oraclize crumble.

great great idea. linkmarines assemble!

Take this to reddit! Twitter too

literally everyone who wants a secure connection to the blockchains will use LINK.
LITERALLY EVERYONE IN A MARKET THAT KEEPS ON GROWING EVERY FUCKING YEAR.
>literally 11k Banks and every Business will use it
>literally every smart contract on the planet will use it

You can't even imagine the kind of money this shit will print in a few years.

mfw everything turns to link

>>i'm eating link for breakfast

I'm shaking just reading your post. Please Jesus, let that be true.

chainlink provides a decentralised oracle and its tamper proof, every important financial transaction will in some way be connected to LINK as part of a smart contract. every further automatisation in the finance industry will in some way contain chainlink.
If you want to interact in any meaningful way with a blockchain you will have to use chainlink.
If you want a smart contract of any kind, you will use chainlink.
smart contracts are the future and LINK was literally the missing link between the real world and the Blockchains that exist.
isn't that fucking mind boggling? this is literally the future and it trades for .16 cent right now and most of us are already Balls deep into it.

Yes people it's true. LINK will be the next ETH and king of altcoins in the future.

That said it will only start to happen in Q2 2018 because that is the very first date a service using LINK will launch. It has no genuine reason to pump before that date so it's probably better to sell your link and hold BTC or something until Q2 2018 and buy 3-5x the amount of LINK you are holding right now.

...

the only reasonable thing to do is sell everything you don't need and pump every dollar into LINK as long as the price stays low.
>literally every smartcontract will be working with chainlink in the future

Everyone who invests in link today will be shit rich. No matter what. If You own 10k link in a year you WILL be a millionaire.

shits hilarious because people don't even see it yet. there is like 12k wallets worldwide. if you hold LINK right now you already made it. its gonna be fucking obscene how much cash we will make with this.

3k LINK here

Am I gonna make it user? I hate wagecucking.

I'm actually surprised and didn't know SALT used oracalize. I'd like to know why that is. All I can think is that they are using it for the time being until chainlink network is ready.

>Am I gonna make it user?
the amount of LINK you hold determines how long you have to wait before you make it. Use as much of your wagecucking money to accumulate as much LINK as possible.

It would be better to try and get them to use chainlink in a friendly manner. For example confido uses oraclize but they want to switch to chainlink once it's more developed. Why scare away potential customers like that by being a dick?
Although a single example of what can go wrong with centralized oracles would be great for link.

brb applying for a job at oraclize

For what it is and how it needs to be used, LINK won't ever go above about 5 dollars

When SALT started development ChainLINK wasn't publicly announced yet. Can't use something if you don't know it exists.

Only 2.4k LINK here - NEED MORE

who even gives a fuck about what one fucksmall miniscule startup wants to use?
soon every financial institution will use chainlink for their smart contracts.

the only reason smart contracts didn't take off yet was because a LINK was missing. now it exists and Smart contracts will become mainstream.

I can't believe people still trying make others buy this shit
Why are you doing this?

Are you unhappy you made already fuckton of people on Veeky Forums me included poor?

>t. retard who doesn't see the long term potential

Come on linkies, let’s unite for once and spam etheroll and salt and force them to switch. People will forever know chainlink’s agressive marketing.

Nah, it's overkill. Once chainlink network is rolled out any high value use case will gravitate towards decentralized, secure oracles. They are only being rational by using oracalize for the moment until something better pops up.

Salt will probably switch in the long term don't worry. The thing is that ChainLINK isn't ready for full implementation yet since they don't have full API support so that would take months of development time.

They are going to use LINK eventually because it'll be cheaper than using Oracalize.

>muh long term bullshit

My bags of 10k Links are eternal now

I held 10K link as well. Sold for 0.22 and held BTC instead. Did some daytrading and I can now buy 16K LINK.

You are losing out on future LINK holdings by holding LINK. Trade in other stuff until Q2 2018. Don't steal your own LINK by holding it.

I can't trust ETHROLL, scamming company using a centralized oracle to steal profits in the end.

>Does "rent free in your head" mean that people are always thinking about LINK and therefor they live inside their heads without having to pay rent?
Yes. The meme originated during he election when it was said that Trump was living in the liberal medias head rent free

You must be a link holder then

Some fag requested this in an earlier thread, figured this would be a good spot for it.

And ETH will never be more than $6.

Lmao I do feel bad for him though. Hope he doesn't an hero over this bullying.

THAT'S FUCKING IT I'M GOING ALL IN LINK

They cannot switch yet. Confido wants to use Link but they can't as the network is not ready yet.

Buy LINK
We live rent free in the heads of all no LINKers. There is no relief until you
Buy LINK

...

this. LINK is not a coin, it will only be used to feed nodes as payment for transactions, and those payments will be miniscule, like 0.000001 LINK per transaction
a bank could buy 10000 LINK right now for 1.5k dollars and never have to buy link again for 1000 years

>t. Someone who has not read the whitepaper

not an argument against his point, there is no reason link would go up

Same argument was used against eth. Stay poor

oh yeah, that totally makes link rise in price lul, keep providing "quality arguments"

Nobody cares what you do or think.

Uh...node operators decide the cost

holy shit this thread blew up after i went to sleep

With my luck everytime I try to trade it ends in disaster like some cosmic forces fucking me

Buy something - shit crash, sell something - shit mooning

so stop fucking selling LOL

AIDSLINK amirite amirite?

Nobody needs LINK. It's not the gateway to crypto you retards

Kek what a brainlet.

>But its tanking in price... the team hardly does any shilling. Anyway im just thinking of this as an outsider who might buy LINK during this dip.

this.Link is the future. and future takes some time.

This is one of the ChainLink's biggest weakness imo. Not brainlet-friendly. It relies mostly on convincing enterprise level corporations and banks. Once they get even one the brainlets will bandwagon but their gains will be paltry to decent.

>mfw this is what being smart money feels like

Indeed. You need a high IQ to understand chainlink.

>daily reminder that LINK is absolutely useless and simply adds an unneccessary layer
>daily reminder that LINK bagholders to this date havent produced a single real-world case that makes any sense whatsoever
>daily reminder that LINKs are deluded autists who have no idea what they even invested in

well when a company focuses on building actual partnerships, and hiring devs
instead of posting PR speculation and building hype
yeah, it's not brainlet friendly.
they will come when the partnerships are announced, in a few weeks.

Daily reminder that
>Rent Free

Stupid question but can't find the answer anywhere, does placing a buy or sell order money on binance? Not talking about it going trough of course.

I do feel that ChainLink could have some sort of normie level PR to put its usefulness in layman terms. In Devcon3, you wouldn't understand 99% of what Sergey was saying if you are not in crypto.

Some of the other presentations started off more normie friendly before becoming technical.

However, like you said, normies are not Sergeys current target market. This may be a good thing because it is a barrier to the market, similar to early days of bitcoin, meaning we can accumulate more.

I'm setting up a node this weekend.

>>unnecessary layer
So unnecessary that banks are interested in it

>>LINK bagholders to this date havent produced a single real-world case that makes any sense whatsoever
>t. I'm too much of a brainlet to understand LINK please spoonfeed me

>>daily reminder that LINKs are deluded autists who have no idea what they even invested in
Cope more faggot

what

I think he's asking if you need money to place buy / sell orders, lol.

Cost* money

placing orders doesn't cost anything but you need to pay gas if you want to move it off after

>Cope more faggot

oh yeah lifes really without those juicy LINK gains
oh wait no it isnt. your coin is in the shitter and will never go anywhere

we had a longish discussion about the use cases of biz the other day

usually goes something like this

>ask for use case example
>linktards sperg out, call you stupid
>keep asking for use case
>some less retarded anons give examples
>tell them why those examples are retarded and make no sense
>more sperging and namecalling
>insist on a use case
>some linktards give you more shit that makes no sense
>show them why its stupid
>more sperging and namecalling
>repeat until infinity

I just gave a usecase you brainlet. The thread mentioned Etheroll and Salt for fucks sake.

I think we found the guy who buys high because it's "safer" lol

Confido, Salt, ethroll.

>it went 5x then crashed before the fork same as 99% of the alts
I've used this opportunity to triple my LINK stack, you do you buddy. My gains are doing just fine, no reason to get butthurt over other people's money.

I remember you, we posted multiple examples and then you just stopped posting after ignoring everyone's posts and spamming the same crap 10 times over which made you look like a clueless idiot.

All the deluded Linkies have already sold their holdings and exited this shitfest. Anyone who claims otherwise is 100% larping to get (you)s on Veeky Forums. If you happen to be part of the 1% who still believes in this piece of garbage, then I feel extremely sorry for you because you will only have bad times ahead.

I absolutely refuse to believe that anyone is still holding this pump and dump garbage.

so how do you explain all the top wallets either not changing or accumulating more

whales love to accumulate worthless tokens dude it's just for the lulz

I've actually read the whitepaper and yes, the tech is cool, but I don't see that much value in the tokens as many of you do.

It's even possible that it won't be used at all, Sergey obviously avoids questions about token use. They could change things based on experiences they gained on the test network, or the requirements of their partners. What's in the whitepaper is not written in stone, you know.

Oh, and the SGX shit. I wouldn't be surprised if it's not tamper-proof at all. Not every Intel technology is gold, it could be a good-for-nothing crap like transactional memory...

Only one thing is sure, they don't give a shit about token inverstors, their communication is awful/non-existent and they do fuckin nothing to put up their shit on more exchanges.

When you have to call cutting edge intel technology you don't understand shit and faulty to FUD Link.

schneier.com/blog/archives/2017/03/using_intels_sg.html

I remember seeing so many posts like this right before ETH mooned

i love this meme
>yes the project might be successful but the token itself will be worthless
please point to one instance of this ever being the case

Literally just bought 3k more link

literally deluded.

literally poor.

It's almost like Town Crier with Link integration completely solves this theoretical issue that isn't actually viable outside of test conditions.

again, ETH threads were shitposted to hell and back by fags like you, and look at what happened.

This is an obvious loophole though, I don't think anyone should be surprised by this. Obviously if the software that you put into an SGX enclave is itself compromised, it can steal sensitive data. It's like saying bank vaults aren't secure because what if you just open the door to let the bankrobber in?

Ah never mind, it's actually two enclaves on the same processor. Should've rtfa