African civs

Turns out black africans had civilizations en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_West_Africa

Other urls found in this thread:

en.lisapoyakama.org/the-ancient-egyptians-were-black/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

You can keep them

OK

>Turns out black africans had civilizations
No shit. If you actually have any historical knowladge you would atleast hear about Mali or Aksum. Only historical illiterates refuse this.
Bigger question is how did those civilizations influenced north africa/europe/asia.

with shit tons of gold and kola nuts

Trade Timbuktu wars and Hajjs

People are always trying to attribute black civilizations to non black people

No they don't.

I'm tired of these nigger threads.

Yeah they did, really shitty ones that are easily dwarfed by anything built by just about anybody aside from Aboriginals, Inuits and other people living in really harsh conditions.

Malians had control of the global economy great Zimbabwe had trade reaching as far as China and India

Swahili City States were an economic back bone to the Indian ocean trade even Chinese admirals sailed to kenya

Nice headcanon.

>how did those civilizations influenced north africa/europe
By selling slaves :)

Reminder that Kush was a world power when Europeans were living in mud huts.

Gold ivory books coral stone exotic animals etc

The had anime tear swords

Europeans weren't living in mudhuts retard

Salty

Kush was never a world power. The only time it had any sort of relevance to the civilisations around them was when Egypt was in turmoil and the Kushites took advantage of that. They might have ruled Egypt for a few years, but the only land they had sway over was Egypt and Nubia and they owe that brief period of success to living off Egypt's name. They still got BTFO with complete ease by the superior Mesopotamians when they tried to take on the big boys in the playground.

The were living grass huts until the meds came along and taught them better

Med is in Europe retad

who are "they"? Finns? the northernmost Russians?
because if you're referring to the "standard northern European" Germanics, Celts or Slavs that's just flat out false

Sorry eastern Europe

This thread has devolved from the topic hasn't it

They were one of the few organized kingdoms of the era, ruled over Egypt and successfully resisted Rome. Sounds like a minor world power to me.

Meanwhile G*rmanics were scratching their asses in mud huts

Nubians and Egyptians were actually the same people

- Their "organised kingdom" was dogshit compared to those within the Fertile Crescent.

- They were only allowed to rule Egypt because superior entities tolerated them for a while, but they easily got their shit pushed in once they got too big for their boots.

- The Scots resisted Rome. They must have been such a relevant world power, right?

They were the same people from the same place. The bulk of what people think of as AE culture neutral is actually ancient Nubian culture, and Greeks aping that culture later on. Even the word "Egypt" is greek, and they never referred to themselves as such.

en.lisapoyakama.org/the-ancient-egyptians-were-black/

WE

Lest just ignore them and focus on east and west Africa

Niolites are east african

>he doesn't know of the glorious history of the African east coast nations like the Somalis and Swahilis

>After the Roman conquest of the Nabataean Empire and the Roman naval presence at Aden to curb pillaging, Somali and Gulf Arab merchants by agreement barred Indian ships from trading in the free port cities of the Arabian peninsula[27] to protect the interests of Somali and Arab merchants in the extremely lucrative ancient Red Sea–Mediterranean Sea commerce

It's the reason why the Portuguese decided to circumnavigate Africa in the first place it was for slavery or colonization but control of major trading ports.

90% of the history threads are about European history, is it so hard for you to ignore this one if you don't like it?

>it was for slavery or colonization
I meant, was not for

>Malians had control of the global economy

Oh did they now.

I'd say unironically slavery was the biggest impact West Africans had on Europe and the world in general.
Europeans got the idea of "employing" slaves from africans themselves and if you look at the economic impact and the social impact slavery had on whole of New World, you can't deny it outranks any of the gold, kole or gum trade

>Their "organised kingdom" was dogshit compared to those within the Fertile Crescent.
And very developed compared to those of Northern Europe in the same period.

>- They were only allowed to rule Egypt because superior entities tolerated them for a while, but they easily got their shit pushed in once they got too big for their boots.
Sounds like you are grasping at straws. No shit Sherlock, every conqueror has to be tolerated by the conquered.

>- The Scots resisted Rome. They must have been such a relevant world power, right?
The Romans were not that interested in Scotland, they built a wall and that was it. Meanwhile the Kushites successfully resisted and got a favorable peace treaty out of them. Big difference.

Lel that's the same site that says the Native Americans were black. You actually believe that garbage?

Read it

WAS

African history = mud huts, cannibalism and diseases. Nobody cares about that. Stop pushing this obvious political agenda.

Cannibalism was practiced all over the world how about you research

Half of Europe's and Asia's gold was coming from there

Your pushing one right now why do you care so much

...

What's happening with this board? Stop posting this nigger shit.