Why have the direct descendants of the early great civs been reduced to marginalized nobodies, Italians, Iraqis, Moors, Niolites, and Indians.
While former barbarians, savages, slaves, and non-existants risen to power. Germanics, and Americans
Why have the direct descendants of the early great civs been reduced to marginalized nobodies, Italians, Iraqis, Moors, Niolites, and Indians.
While former barbarians, savages, slaves, and non-existants risen to power. Germanics, and Americans
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
economics.mit.edu
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
indiatimes.com
viralthread.com
twitter.com
decadence
the end of this video is your answer to why things reversed.
China seems to be doing fine.
Colonialism and institution building
italians and greeks are doing fine and their culture,phisolofy strenght and glory are more alive than ever in the wester world ,they never died
What have Indians achieved in their history?
Buddhism started in Nepal.
Induism started in Pakistan/Afghanistan.
The "Indian numbers" were invented in Pakistan/Afghanistan.
Sikhism started in Afghanistan/Pakistan.
Harappa civilization was in Pakistan.
There are actually only 6-7 countries in the World with a bigger economy than Italy, and all of them have a much bigger population. Italy with the natural resources and the population size of Russia or America would be the biggest economy in the World.
Industrial revolution
the former barbarians (germans and japanese) turned their barbarian autism into industrial output and became richer than the ancient civilizations
The Chinese haven't really budged from their place since the Qin.
Iran considers itself in some ways the cultural and territorial successors of all the previous dynasts of Eranshahr. And Iranians now, as they have always, are exerting power and influence over the Middle East.
I think you're also underestimating the cultural inheritance of ancient Germanic society. It was one deprived of the advanced metallurgy of their Mediterranean and Celtic neighbours, but they still developed societies and hierarchies as complex as the land would allow. They wouldn't be able to form the functional Roman Successor states if they were the low-brow, idiotic savages you made them out to be.
en.wikipedia.org
Now please tell me who this semen demon is.
Indians aren't descendants of any great civs, the Pakis are, still valid point in any case
Because changes in technology and economics favor certain countries over others.
>Why have the direct descendants of the early great civs been reduced to marginalized nobodies, Italians, Iraqis, Moors, Niolites, and Indians.
Their Nordic blood got too diluted
>Germany: Autistic Screeching for 2000 Years
they constantly ruin everything for everybody because of their ego and the world is not safe until the last German is buried. it's a constant cycle of feeling left out, overshooting, destroying everyone else's society, and then sulking.
you'll always be barbarians with a rule fetish.
t. Paki-apologist
Get the fuck out of my country you disgusting filth piece of shit. Pakis are the most subhuman out of any minority group I have seen, and they are delusional on top of that.
>Their Nordic blood got too diluted
Then why did Scandinavian nations take so long to advance, even with technology, land, resources, and populations on par with other nations such as Scotland or Holland? One could even point to Prussia as an instance of a relatively small state overcoming obstacles such as land and resource deficiencies.
He said GERMANIC, not German. Nordic Bronze Age was in Scandinavia.
Fuck off Pajeet.
China?
it is really surprising how large an economy Italy has, considering their reputation as something of a mess of a country, where all the young people have to leave due to no job opportunities for anyone with an education, while having to deal with a constant migrant problem because of their geography.
Especially considering their geographic size and population
Italy is full of mafia like little Italy
Go shit in the ganges while worshiping your cow mother Pajeet.
...
>greeks are doing fine
Considering most of the Indus river is located in Pakistan, it's Pakistan that should really be called India. "Indian" culture is based around the Ganges, so it really should be renamed into Gangia, or Gangrene, or Gangrape.
>North Italy is Norway tier
>South Italy is Romania tier
Pretty expected desu
Passionary theory of ethnogenesis. Basically cultures are akin to living organisms - if they are succesful and create large states, they later wither away or die out completely.
Because time always moves on. Nothing lasts forever:
Here is what I believe.
Civilisation, and urbanism in particular, creates extremely unnatural habitat for society, that erodes and literally drives the citizens insane, as well as whole society overtime, despite providing an immense direct power.
The only society that seems to be resilient either socially or genetically are the Chinese. That is evolution at work right here.
Oh look it’s the porki poster shilling on Veeky Forums again.
Porkis were second class citizens in Punjab back in the British Raj, and their descendants are still second class today.
It’s funny to believe that the so-called “pure” Porkis are also responsible for one of the worst diasporas out there.
pic related
Fucking Walloons dragging us down. Please comme and annex us William.
Oh look, an Indian whose ancestors the British labeled as "non-martial" races compared to the Pakistani ethnic groups whose warrior prowess were acknowledged.
>Porki
Ironic considering Hindus worship pigs and rats
Why TF does it make up a "Indus-Ganges" civilization? The Indus was an ancient civilization while the ganges civ doesn't even exist.
Lol
Pakistani subhuman
>believing in unscientific, qualitative D&C claptrap by the British
LMAO this is just a new level of cuckoldry. It only takes a simple google search to find out that "martial races" could easily be removed for rebellion and sedition.
Listen Porki, no matter how hard you shill the ""purity"" of your people, you will never be able to convince anyone of your supposed superiority.
This is the exact same mentality as your elites, which has led you to focus on agitating India rather than aiming for economic growth and poverty reduction (being of a slave of China doesn't count btw)
pic related
>Why have the direct descendants of the early great civs been reduced to marginalized nobodies, Italians, Iraqis, Moors, Niolites, and Indians.
>While former barbarians, savages, slaves, and non-existants risen to power. Germanics, and Americans
The people living in what is now Italy were illiterate barbarian savages whilst the Mesopotamians and Egyptians were building pyramids, sculpting mighty statues and developing written language. Why is the line drawn arbitrarily at the end of the 1st century BC for 'great civilisations'?
Also lmao at 'Moors' who only became relevant centuries after Germanic peoples had developed advanced Kingdoms and cultures, and only then because they went full jihad on Iberia and destroyed countless monuments just to prove they could
Fpbp
Where exactly do you take that information? As far as I remember Italy is barely avoiding Greece status in the EU. And after personally visiting the country those claims are more than justified.
Heh, I don't have to show pictures of pajeets because everyone already knows what shit they look like.
Even your pajeet media acknowledges the superiority of Pakistanis compared to you australeoids.
indiatimes.com
viralthread.com
Wonder why street shitters are never on the list of best looking people. inb4 Indian Inferiority Complex. Bet you wish you were a Pakistani, or even a punjabi Indian.
>Why have the direct descendants of the early great civs been reduced to marginalized nobodies, Italians, Iraqis, Moors, Niolites, and Indians.
You forgot Mexicans and Peruvians, but your point still applies.
Forgot to reply to this in Also the fact this image puts the huari/wari and the Chimu on a seperate line from the other andean/peruvian civilizations is dumb, same for not inclduing the moche
this is an idiotic bait thread, for one, Americans, like Britons, were the paramount of civilization of their day. To call them barbarians is only a vain effort to inspire indignation.
Fall of the Mayans is grim
>resorting to “muh dik” style arguments to project
Listen man, no one in India cares if we’re good looking or not compared to the world. If that’s the metric for assessing superiority, then you have failed my friend.
And if anything, the Pakistanis should be the ones with the inferiority complex since a country of australoid-caucasoid-mongoloid mutts (which we freely admit) beats “pure” Pakistan on 95% of social indicators, including HDI + GDP per capita, with great growth prospects for the future.
So just end this argument please, because you clearly have just resorted to charlantry to shill Pakistan.
Because locations which are conducive to fostering early civilization are not necessarily the best once civilization expands in scope, technology and material needs. Most civilizations started in fertile river valleys that had regular water supplies and a central location either regionally or in the area where Africa, and Eurasia meet. Yet once the other regions catch on to the civilization thing you need more than just agriculture output to stay competitive. In Mesopotamia case they had perfect clay to start up easy agriculture but it came with a relatively low "cap" on potential and in the end salinity issues fucked them. Italy, Greece and the Levant were big because the Mediterranean was the main travel way for all civilization since boat travel was always faster than foot travel. Then there came a point where the Mediterranean wasn't the most important sea in the world begin supplanted by the Atlantic. They lost all of their leverage.
The final nail come in industrialization when shittier locations which had large land masses and large mineral resource stores finally adapt civilizations methods such as was the case with Russia and now Africa. It doesn't matter that Russia is frozen over when cold resistant crops are able to proliferate, building heating comes into play, and there is enough metals and coal to far outpace the original cradles of civilization in production. It also doesn't matter that Africa is always either stricken with drought or an insect infested hellhole when the proper reservoir and irrigation systems are finally developed in the lands that had a 1000 year head start due to not being drought stricken, in addition to new strains of drought resistant crops. The bugs can finally get fucked with the advent of pesticides, mosquito nets, and germ theory.
Your country may have enough bronze to make you the undisputed lords of the bronze age but that means fuck-all when the iron age comes about.
Oh yes, nice one Allesandro, you first make fun of people with microcephaly in 2 threads, then go
>Oh muh pajeet superiority, how could you make fun of us pajeets being ugly?
>because you clearly have just resorted to charlantry
Do you even know what you're writing?
Also, when you stop making fun of people with genetic disorders is when I'll stop insulting you ugly cow worshiping pajeets.
K Allesandro?
Italians and Moors (Moroccans-Algerians) (and Greeks which you forgot to mention) aren't doing that bad though
>phisolofy