Fit in a nutshell

Fit in a nutshell

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nix_v._Hedden
ia800300.us.archive.org/16/items/capitalismandsla033027mbp/capitalismandsla033027mbp.pdf
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

...

this was from a thread a few days ago

A tomato is a fruit and the civil war was not about slavery. Freeing the slaves was a great consequence, but Lincoln and the Union didn't go into the war trying to cape for black people. They did that out of spite.

...

Lol, tomatoe is a fruit tho.

Someone got butthurt and made that generic graph into something specific

The Republican party was seeking to halt the spread of slavery and the southern states threatened to leave if Lincoln won as they felt this would keep them from needing to give up what they viewed an integral part of their culture

well hes not wrong

this is also Veeky Forums in a nutshell

Yeah the issue of slavery in new states was definitely a cause. But it was never the intention of the feds to emancipate slaves at least in the beginning. So state sovereignty can probably be considered the main issue in the conflict, emancipation and slavery more subordinate issues. So I guess you both are right?

I hate how they teach the civil war in school, they boil it down to "the south wanted slaves and theyre bad, the north fought to free the slaves they are good"

the civil war was the culmination of 80+ years of the federalist/anti-federalist debate that wasnt solved when creating the country. The southern states believed that they should have more autonomy as a State and the Federal government was violating states rights an overstepping their boundaries. Think of it as Poland today telling the EU to go fuck itself and the EU telling Poland to get in line and obey. While slavery was the hot topic at the time and a prime example of legislation that states themselves felt they should have the right to dictate, the Civil War was not fought over slavery, it was fought over states rights. This is also why you sometimes hear it called "The War of the States", although that name has widely fallen out of use today

this

i've been saying it for years Veeky Forums is the dunning kruger effect in imageboard form

it's mostly people in their first couple years of lifting thinking they know everything there is to know and giving shitty advice (with great confidence) to even newer newfags

that's the point, we all know. It's not like anybody will die for saying it's a veggie

Go play your video games you retard.

>halt the spread of slavery
They didn't even ban slaves in the north. Rich pricks in New York still had black house slaves. Emancipation Proclaimation only happened in order to fuck over the south, and it was the only place the law was actually enforced following the war. Then the Republicans had the nerve to let the south get away with "sharecropping" and spearheaded early northern Jim Crow decades later as blacks sought to escape southern hell and the Democrat's KKK. They never gave a fuck about the slaves as people. Neither party did.

The world in a nutshell

exblain pls

the enigma of amigara fault

a horror comic where the tectonic plate moves
up above the surface due to an earthquake, they discover there are human shaped holes in the stone wall. people go to see it because they see a hole that looks exactly like them, its "their hole"

Idiot

Quit talking out of your ass. Slavery was abolished in New York State in 1827 and slaves ran away from the south to the north all the time to become free.

The tomato is a vegetable because the courts say so. Praise the Constitution!
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nix_v._Hedden

You fags are proving the picture. It's wrong for saying that tomato is biologically not a vegetable.

Abolitionism only came about after slavery had fulfilled its economic function and could be dispensed with. ia800300.us.archive.org/16/items/capitalismandsla033027mbp/capitalismandsla033027mbp.pdf

/pol/ in a nutshell

Didn't they say pizza is a vegetable?

IMO anybody that discusses quantum physics and doesn't preface with "Now, I don't know much about quantum physics..." is definitely on mt. stupid.

whats that from

lol yeah except the southern states wanted to use federal laws to enforce their will on northern states re: escaped slaves. but yeah, keep repeating the muh states rights meme

Just because they abolished slavery didn't mean that they liked blacks or wanted them to live near them.

No shit. Northern/liberal racism was and is still a thing but that isn't what I was rebutting.

>the Civil War was not fought over slavery, it was fought over states rights

What rights were the States fighting for other than slavery?

A vast majority of it involved interstate trade and import/export. Things like throwing tariffs on goods from other states in order to encourage citizens to buy "home grown" products and the like. Federal taxes taken from the states was another hot topic that many southern elite were staunchly against. Southern states also wanted to increase trade with Europe while the North was more isolationist in nature, which led to tension because international trade was a federal issue.

It was decided that pizza is appropriate school fare because it provides a serving of vegetables due to its tomato sauce.

I bet those good included slaves

Abolished and not enforced.
Economic freedom to trade. Slaves were a big part of it but it's not the reason the war occurred. The war occurred because the south seceded, wanted economic independence, and didn't want to listen to the North. The Republicans up north really gave a fuck less about them actually using slaves.

They weren't noble heroes looking to free the slaves. They were a government trying to stop the south from leaving and asserting itself. Neither side actually cared about black people. I mean Lincoln originally planned to put them all on boats and ship them back to Africa, and had some questionable quotes regarding the racial hierarchy. He wasn't some bleeding heart abolitionist standing up for the rights of his fellow man. He and the rest of the Republicans literally just wanted to set the south straight and freeing the slaves was used as a punishment, not something done because it's morally right.

>abolished and not enforced
Got a source on that? The north no longer had use for slaves due to the shift in economics as another user pointed out. The South on the other hand thrived mostly on agriculture.

The original picture didn't have the examples. Some buttblasted redditor had to show his political stance into this

>If you do squats your biceps will grow
>Not eating breakfast spikes testosterone by 140%
>Did you know humans don't actually need carbs?
>Reps 6-7 on a set do nothing, so if you hit these two but then can't go on your set accomplished nothing
Broscience, the board

Thank God I'm not in public school anymore

why would anyone cut their breasts?
even a pinch on the nipple is painful

hole = manlet pit

There is no bilogicall definition of "vegetable". There is one for "fruit" though. The word vegetable is a culinary only term, but the word fruit has a culinary definition and a biological definition, this two définitions are not the same (duh). Tomatoes are culinary vegetables and biological fruits and also culinary fruits.

>the right to slavery
are you being stupid on purpose?

I think it is a joke like the guy is so autistic that a girl just walks up and tells him her vagina is made for him but he is so focused on fitting in the hole he misses out on the best part of getting fit.