(2/2)
>correlation versus causation
>ONE 19 year old man
>what are anecdotes
I'm actually very open to the possibility that soy has negative effects on men's health, HOWEVER, the effects it has are tentatively understood, at best, and even if there are effects, they're almost certainly insignificant. Which is why I'm usually annoyed at people overreacting to it and putting so much focus on soy.
Like I said before: eat a good diet, exercise, go out in the sun, lower stress, etc. This is what's important for test (and damn near every other aspect of your health). Acting paranoid and autistic over things like soy is generally a waste of time and not important at all. Also >fat "men" have low T you braindead intellectual wannabe teenager. If you're so smart you can are the connection there
I literally did make the connection there, you braindead intellectual wannabe teenager. Did you not read my entire comment?
>It's not a conspirancy you idiot, and you didn't even disprove it, you just "justified" it
>which still won't make the T levels of nu males acceptable
>the T levels of nu males
>nu males
You and the OP have presented it varyingly as either a "conspiracy" or some kind of societal "epidemic", which it is not. Lordy lordy, you're calling me an intellectual wannabe while I'm speaking actual science, meanwhile you're over there talking about "the T levels of nu males"? The irony is incredible.
>Did someone say the opposite?
They added in all this paranoid bullshit about "chemicals in the water" and the "state of the modern man". I.e. your stupid nu male bullshit again.
>still produces more or less the same amounts of test that his dad and granddads and so forths did during their own youths however many decades ago.
Literally the entire thread topic and every similar paranoid test thread is about how modern men supposedly have less test for any reason other than because of their lifestyles and personal choices.