Why does questioning virtually any...

Why does questioning virtually any, even a minor aspect of the Holocaust get you years-long prison scentences in 16 countries and also in other countries with general and non-specific anti-racism laws, but questioning any other genocide in history doesn't get you anything except maybe a fine for possibly racism, with the exception for Holodomor in Ukraine which is illegal to question?

Why do we, who haven't taken part, care about that genocide today? Why is it being taught in schools extensively, but other more deadlier are barely mentioned?

Why does it have countless memorials for it all over the world, while other genocides do not?

Attached: 7175516-3x2-940x627.jpg (940x627, 106K)

Other urls found in this thread:

telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/9643356/Rwanda-Hutu-opposition-leader-jailed-for-denying-genocide.html
armenianweekly.com/2017/05/30/mukaddes-alatas-arrested/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armenian_Genocide_denial#Legislation
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

>hey guys I have a totally innocent question about the holocaust
>okay here are some facts for you
>well I don't believe those facts
>you sound like a nazi
>CENSORSHIP CENSORSHIP WHY CAN'T I ASK AN HONEST QUESTION IT'S A CONSPIRACY

The Holodomor was confined mostly to Ukraine, while the Holocaust killed people throughout Europe. Thus more countries have reason to ban Holocaust denial than Holodomor denial.

>why do other countries with other perspectives have different laws on this thing I don't even believe happened in a time period that doesn't directly affect me today
Why do you fucking care?

How come poltards dont get this

>Why does questioning virtually any, even a minor aspect of the Holocaust get you years-long prison scentences in 16 countries and also in other countries with general and non-specific anti-racism laws
It doesn't. If it was, guys like Chris Browning would be in jail.

>but questioning any other genocide in history doesn't get you anything except maybe a fine for possibly racism, with the exception for Holodomor in Ukraine which is illegal to question?
Also wrong.

telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/9643356/Rwanda-Hutu-opposition-leader-jailed-for-denying-genocide.html

armenianweekly.com/2017/05/30/mukaddes-alatas-arrested/

Now, admit to the board that you made an OP post angrily declaring things that you had no idea what you're talking about. Or just admit that you're a /pol/tard. Either one's good.

Fag.

Attached: C2783A43-C1DF-4380-ACCE-AE965E0A584B.png (648x422, 28K)

>presents counter facts
>presents the absurdity of a lot of testimonies
>YOU ANTISEMITE, HOW DARE YOU QUESTION NAZI SOAP AND CONJOINED TWINS

those are still limited to one country unlike the holocaust

yes /pol/ it's literally a conspiracy by the juice teamed up with satan and you are undoubtedly being moral and virtuous pushing this shit day after day and your mom will love you again eventually

Wrong again.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armenian_Genocide_denial#Legislation

Why do you stormfags have such poor pattern recognition skills?
That face is seriously uncanny valley tier

>Why does questioning virtually any, even a minor aspect of the Holocaust get you years-long prison scentences in 16 countries and also in other countries with general and non-specific anti-racism laws, but questioning any other genocide in history doesn't get you anything except maybe a fine for possibly racism, with the exception for Holodomor in Ukraine which is illegal to question?

Holocaust denial is mainly perceived as a Trojan Horse for neo-Nazism (name one Holocaust denier who isn't at least somewhat sympathetic to the Nazis, I dare yah) whereas Holodomor denial is just buttblasted tankie babies sperging out.

Attached: holocaust carousel.gif (400x328, 902K)

literally one case cherrypicking, same people in every thread

Not even laws against genocide denial would save one of the dullest regimes in the history of totalitarian states. Seriously, each history chapter surrounding the failed painter and his pals from the National Socialist German Workers' Party as they fight what they call the „international Jewry“ has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the monumental imagery, the regimes‘ only consistency has been it’s lack of excitement and ineffective use of it’s military, all to make anti-semitism seem tactically Jewish, to make it’s misinterpreted Nietzschean inspiration seem inert.
Perhaps the die was cast when Hitler ordered the Night of the Long Knives: he made sure his regime would never be taken seriously by anyone besides the world’s most ignorant, moronic extremists. Just a ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for his book.
The Third Reich might have been anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly anti-adventurous in it’s refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least their military was good though
„No!“ The Wehrmacht was dreadful, their campaigns ultimately a disaster. As I studied, I noticed that everytime they went to war, the Germans conducted one or another atrocity. I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that the Wehrmacht conducted an atrocity or conducted some form of „Jewish“ act, such as false-flag attacks. I stopped only after I marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. The mind of a National Socialist is so governed by autistic fantasies of romantism that they have no other way of acting. Later I read a lavish, Holocaust-denying paper on Adolf Hitler by David Irving. He wrote something to the effect of, „If these kids are reading /pol/, they will go on to read David Irving.“ And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read /pol/, you are, in fact, trained to read David Irving.

Attached: 1473063744425.jpg (1496x2888, 528K)

Where does Dixie fix on that picture?

Attached: 800px-Flag_of_the_Confederate_States_of_America_(Third,_variant).svg.png (800x533, 20K)

>Why does questioning virtually any, even a minor aspect of the Holocaust get you years-long prison scentences
It doesn't

People who post the same holocaust thread crap should be fucking sent in prison
Either the guy is a massive bait shitposter or a very deluded /pol/tard

Southerner here, the Confederacy was a bunch of faggots sending poor people to die so they could keep larping as European aristocrats

I have a question to any holocaust denier browsing this board:

If, as is often alleged, the Holocaust is nothing more than sympathy propaganda drilled into the heads of malleable children, then how come so many holocaust deniers are ignorant of the holocaust as it is claimed in the mainstream narrative? Clearly, such mass propaganda isn't very good if the people who are dedicating time and effort to combat it can't clearly recite talking points. If some shadowy cabal is trying to make sure its message gets out, why is it doing so incompetently? And if it is so incompetent, why worry about it?

>„No!“
Ruined

>Why do massacre/genocides become politically sanctioned topics
Because it's in the government's interests to shill for itself? Japan still largely denies the Rape of Nanking and China still over estimates the shit out of it due to purely political purposes.
>Why do European authorities not want their narratives to be question
I mean that's not exactly a new thing desu, europoors are just uncivilized savages who can't understand why it's important to talk about serious issues

Attached: Eg4Hwhd.gif (1064x589, 999K)

>Why does questioning virtually any, even a minor aspect of the Holocaust get you years-long prison scentences in 16 countries and also in other countries with general and non-specific anti-racism laws, but questioning any other genocide in history doesn't get you anything except maybe a fine for possibly racism, with the exception for Holodomor in Ukraine which is illegal to question?
Because jews have a huge amount of political and financial capital and use it to push an ethnocentric agenda. Not even denying it happened but jews need to fuck off trying to censor free speech..

Attached: mob.jpg (203x248, 9K)

>then how come so many holocaust deniers are ignorant of the holocaust as it is claimed in the mainstream narrative?
>Why isn't propoganda 100% effective
>Some shadowy cabal
>Every revisionist thinks the Holocaust is 100% fake
Sit down and read a few more books about contemporary history plz , if you really think it's unusual for governments or states to control information for political purposes then you're prettyuch completely ignorant of modern history.

Holocaust "denial" or "revisionism" varies in degrees btw, most of the denial centers around mass gassings and still leaves millions dead at the hands of Nazis due to things like the Hunger Plan

Attached: 1507979717593.png (211x239, 4K)

what mainstream narrative are you talking about?
I myself, was taught about lampshades made of Jew skin.

Jews are mentally unable to register nonjews as people thus they treat nonjews like us very cruelly as they think its what nature intended, to the jew a goy questioning the holocaust is like a rat asking why humans laid traps for him, the rat should shut up and deal with the fact humans will continue to trap him. This is us and jews they want us to just shut up and believe anything they say as we are goyim we dont know anything.

t. Carpetfagger

Attached: Andersonvillewitz.png (679x873, 1000K)

What country is this supposed to be?

da juis be keepin da white man down

>muh lost cause

I'm a Jew, and I don't see anyone else as being inherently subhuman. Your comment is specifically hypocritical because you accuse Jews of looking down on all non-Jews but then swiftly go on to compare Jews to rats and non-Jews to humans. So are you being a victim or or racial purist. Protip: you can only pick on.

Dont act dumb Cohen the rat is the goy the human is the jew thats what my metaphor meant.

I'm talking things like:

The notion that around 6 million Jews were killed by Nazis from all causes and locations, not say, that all 6 million were then gassed and cremated in Auschwitz, as I've heard more than once.

That all the Jews killed in the Holocaust were from Germany; since Germany had a Jewish population of about half a million, clearly there is a gross exaggeration somewhere.

The notion that no, Hitler was not planning on murdering every single Jew the second he got into office, that the developments of the Nazi party's methods were just that, developments.

That there were Jews who were put into forced labor programs instead of being immediately killed the seconds the Nazis got their hands on them.

That "chronic shortages" at the camps were somehow caused by Allied strategic bombing.

That because there was a typhus epidemic around Auscwhitz in 1942, and Anne Frank later died of Typhus in 1945, clearly, there was a raging typhus epidemic, all over Europe, lasting for years.

I really, really, really like this image.

Its meant to be a parody of those gifs because the premise that not side in the war were free of immoral actions

Looks kinda like the misfits logo

Here's your (You) faggot. Now fuck off with your gay pasta.

related

Attached: 75824395.png (713x423, 16K)

>muh slavery revisionism

>Europ*ans
>free speech
Not even a Burger, but their Bill of Rights is al dente. I wish we had one like that.

>Free speech means I can say whatever I want with literally zero consequences
Incitement, get fucked kid

Attached: 1519232449184.png (645x729, 105K)