Were there any good guys in WW2? Axis were all totalitarians. UK was a colonial empire, same as France. USA was a global hegemon, enforcing its will over South America and Pacific via a pile of corpses. China was completelly totalitarian.
Was there anyone in WW2 with "clean hands"? I was thinking maybe Tibet. Then again, to my knowledge, Tibet was not part of WW2. Was there a democratic government with no oppresive policies performed to be found during WW2?
Even Swiss was importing tons of Jew gold.
Since when is being Colonialist or Hegemonic bad? If that were true then being weak would be the only virtue. Also Finland
>good guys
get lost.
finland was probably the closest you'll get to a 'major' belligerent that came away with relatively clean hands and international reputation. not saying they were perfect but they weren't "that" bad.
The US was clean and pure, faggot. Oh sure, they may have roasted a little meat here, there and well, probably everywhere, but nobody's perfect.
>Was there a democratic government with no oppresive policies performed to be found during WW2?
Ireland and Sweden
Denmark behaved quite well considering they were collaborating with the Axis
>USA was a global hegemon
Not until after the war and they had to share with the Soviets
The US and UK were good guys. As were all UK dominions.
The UK was most definitely not a good guy.
Canada. Obviously.
We politely waited 2 weeks after the UK to declare war on Germany.
Our navy was most responsible for convoy escorts.
We liberated the Netherlands.
We house Nazi POWs in the prairie provinces and allow them to work on farms in some cases.
Also:
We had an entirely volunteer army. While conscription was put in place, due to protest no conscripts were sent into battle/overseas.
Why not?
They were better than the Germans and the Japs at least
In my hometown(Canada) we hold our yearly carnival in the old POW camp. Some of the old buildings are still there.
I couple years ago some german note fell down from the rafters.
From Best to Worst:
Canada
Australia
New Zealand
UK
France
Finland
US
China
Soviet Union
Italy
Vichy France
Germany
Japan
Poland. And WWII ended on 21 october 1963
Are you talking during WWII or after? I fail to see what the US did wrong other than if you want to argue that they dis-proportionally favored Britain despite maintaining neutrality.
>equating good with democratic and equating anything anti-democratic as bad
user, I...
USA were the good guys though, they are only a global power in the sense that they try to liberate oppressed people from authoritarianism and dictatorships.
Sweden acted like kikes, their ore made the Nazi war effort possible.
Unironically Poland, Yugoslavia, Czechoslovakia, Finland, Estonia, Luxemburg, Denmark, Norway and Greece.
These nations did literally nothing wrong and had to suffer because ideological niggers obsessed with clay wanted war and bloodshed for "muh aesthetic unifroms n'shiet"
Fuck warmongering niggers and death to all of them.
>he doesn't believe in democratic peace theory
Finland did literally nothing wrong.
If nothing he did the most good to the world killing soviets
>UK above US
>China as a single entity
>Soviets above Italy
>Soviets above anybody
>Finland not at the top
>France even on the list
Can it get any worse?
Ah yes, the 21st of October 1963, the first recodred instance of the word "beetlemania". When The Daily Mail was sent out on that day, the world knew that the war had truly ended.
What did the soviets do that was that bad? I know that their soldiers and ex POWs raped many German and Polish women, but over 4000 of them were prosecuted for it which is far more than the 69 americans who were brought to court marshall for war crimes against germans, which totally happened. It's not like they intentionally firebombed entire cities constructed out of wood to dust, murdering hundreds of thousands of non combatants, and then for kicks dropped two nuclear weapons. They also didn't intentionally genocide any country during the war.
>Czechoslovakia, Finland, Estonia, Luxemburg, Denmark, Norway
These were the only democratic nations out of all of those you listed though
Oh boy it's another "Who were the objective good guys in history" thread.
Commit suicide.
being a cuckold =/= being "good"
Southern poland
Poland and France for the most part
Though if France cucked Germany less the Nazis probaby wouldnt come to power. They should have just taken the french parts of Alsace and the Ruhr valley occupation was probably a mistake
>Tibet
>not a totalitarian medieval theocratic hellhole
they raped russian and bayoneted russian children they started the war against russia contrary to popular belief
No, they were the same as the Germans and Japs, imperialist warmongers, murdering all who got in their way, and inventing concentration camps.
The good guys were the nations who ended up being occupied by both the Axis and the Allies.
>Le Liberte, Egalite, Fraterinite!
>Except for le Arab or le Indochinois. Dey be not pipol!
Italy
top jej
fucking finns i swear being so threateningly close to St Leningrad
>Were there any good guys in WW2?
yes, the Axis
Norway and Luxembourg
Australia
I'd say probably Canada, although you can always pick nits.
Soviets. Government put into power by popular revolt against a tyrannical regime, literally dindu nuffin as Stalin was a pretty cautious man. Yes, the purges were pretty bad but it was mostly military officers affected by them. They didn't get anywhere close to the UK's concentration camps over in South Africa or the US's ones for Japs.
Also they were attacked first. They were literally willing to just stand there until Adolf decided to sperg out and attack for no reason.
>Were there any good guys in WW2?
Yes, everyone.
>Tibet
>Good guys with clean hands
>Implying that the religious upper class didn't live with obscene amounts of luxury and possessions compared to their completely impoverished people.
You mean the government that was abducting all aboriginal children from their families?
Used slave labour.
>I couple years ago some german note fell down from the rafters.
Should have used it as a toilet paper
Finland is atleast in top 3.
The problem is seeing WWII in hindsight, as some kind of historical set piece in which there are good guys and bad guys. In reality, it was a complex series of events that happened at the same time, many of which had nothing to do with one another. We talk about the Japanese war in China, for example, in the same breath as the German invasion of the Soviet Union. But they had almost nothing to do with one another except temporally.
>genocide
I would suggest reading a bit more history.
Or basically enslaved them by handing them out to farmers for work?
>Since when is being Colonialist or Hegemonic bad
It takes a special type of clod to ask this kind of question.
Unless you're some kind of civilizationist poseur espousing not-too-subtle supremacist sentiments.