Why was sub-saharan Africa incapable of creating any civilization or culture of great value?

Why was sub-saharan Africa incapable of creating any civilization or culture of great value?

Attached: maxresdefault (3).jpg (1920x1080, 73K)

Other urls found in this thread:

merriam-webster.com/dictionary/anecdotal
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_rights_in_Saudi_Arabia
google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/world/2006/mar/05/india.theobserver
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G_factor_(psychometrics)
bbc.com/news/amp/world-asia-india-39176570
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_11_attacks
m.huffpost.com/us/entry/4596169
merriam-webster.com/dictionary/irony
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Why?

>Ethiopia
>Mali
>Nubia
>Swahili States
>Oyo
>Nigerian Iron Age
Retard.

For the same reason the amazon wasn't. It's a jungle.

Any culture of great value is subjective, the sahelian empires have left an indelible mark on society.

>Nubia
>Sub-Saharan
Die

WE WAZ IRON AGE IN THE 19TH CENTURY !

Wow

Attached: mud mosque.jpg (920x656, 81K)

Guess its just black culture

>>Ethiopia
>Swahili
>Nigeria
>Nubia

Nigga these places aint even Sub-Saharan , fucking retard

Attached: 1520611873482.jpg (940x1060, 212K)

>seriously replying to a "Why was sub-saharan Africa incapable of creating any civilization or culture of great value?" thread

Attached: 1465355443700.jpg (286x496, 23K)

This is arab architecture

Because blacks have low IQ.

It's not

Attached: download (17).jpg (309x163, 19K)

Attached: map-of-africa-countries.gif (550x578, 30K)

Attached: download (2).png (224x225, 10K)

>iq
Not science, sorry. Iq is pseudoscience.

>what is Wakanda?
Lel whitey BTFO.

Name a sub-saharan country without human sacrifice

Name any country where religious violence hasn't occurred

You sure like using anecdotes don't you
merriam-webster.com/dictionary/anecdotal

How is it different from any other religious violence?

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_rights_in_Saudi_Arabia

google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/world/2006/mar/05/india.theobserver

Not an answer.
NAME ONE(1) SUBSAHARAN COUNTRY WITHOUT HUMAN SACRIFICE

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G_factor_(psychometrics)

Didn't answer my question

>correlation=causation
Spamming this won't make iq become science user.

Iq is not science, therefore iq is pseudoscience.

They supplied 2/3s of the gold in the Mediterranean and. Europe

Why do single out africans for religious violence?

all the famous Ethiopian composers, Malian scientists, Nubian political philosophers, and Nigerian Architects.
Africans are the only people to keep it into the modern age

What's non-scientific about it?

Religious violence happens all over the world

bbc.com/news/amp/world-asia-india-39176570

Timbuktu Sankore etc

Music made africans is among the most popular in the world

Veeky Forums - /pol/bait, WW2 and offtopic shitposting

Because you're incapable of attributing value to anything built by blacks.

It's up to iq supporters to demonstrate iq is science. As iq is not science, then iq is pseudoscience.

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_11_attacks

Because societal evolution isn't a tech tree like in your video games, manchild.

m.huffpost.com/us/entry/4596169

>c. 40,000 years of independent development
>c. 2,000 years behind Eurasia

Seems like it was almost the same rate of development.

Attached: Ife crowned heads.jpg (750x562, 56K)

It wasn't 40000 years

Aslo the had the constant exchange of technology

We can't count developments if we can trace them back to outside the region?

>europeans can't into farming

Also iron complex stone architecture metallurgy the wheel chairiots mathmatics etc

This seems a little bit lame to me, I'm not even one of the racists you spam this stuff out.

I don't see how IQ tests don't fall within the scientific method. They are attempts to measure intelligence. Even if they don't currently measure inteliegence well, which is an area of much debate that I am open to, it doesn't mean they can't be improved with continuous experimentation, that's how science works.

So I ask again. What makes you hold the opinion they are pseudoscience?

Like everywhere. The majority of Africans before colonization were farmers, and used domesticated cattle and goats, as well as local planet domesticates.

It clearly was, since every non-African beat out Africans, even a bunch of people who were completely cut off from other civilizations still independently created more impressive civilization. The only thing a black can feel better about is they they at least surpass the bushmen, pygmies, abos and those andaman islanders remnants.

>What makes you hold the opinion they are pseudoscience?

He's a narcissistic anti-racist negro, so he calls IQ a pseudoscience because he unironically believes that intelligence is some mysterious force that isn't a byproduct of biology. He says it when just a few days ago this happened.

Attached: 1520883833685.jpg (1080x694, 90K)

iq cannot even answer the most fundamental questions:
>doesn't know what is intelligence
>doesn't define intelligence influences
>doesn't explain intelligence physical mechanism
Iq is pseudoscience.

>seriously believing in psychometrics

As opposed to a weak-willed racist negro?

These are the Africans who invented agriculture and metal-working by themselves?

What year did Europe first do something 'impressive'?

Abos Polynesians Northern Indians also the Americas never even made it to the iron age

Why would you shape your opinions using random headlines? I'm not the guy you are moaning about but when I have checked it out the study in question found out they could predict 7% of intelligence difference using DNA.

That's hardly some earth-shattering discovery that changes the fact that science seems to indicate (as far as we can tell with our rudimentary and imperfect attempts to measure intelligence) that environment plays 20%-50% role in determining intelligence.

Northern Indians did.

Polynesians didn't but did figure out how to sail across a whole ocean.

There was copper-working in the Great Lakes region, and precious metals were used for some things in Mexica and South America.

Not an iron age aslo most of Africa has no natrual shores

What is considered a great culture?

North Americans didn't have an iron age, Africans did.

Northern India did have an iron age.

Don't expect a straight answer. If it's something from Europe before 1500, other people did it too. If it's something from Europe after 1500, it was probably paid for if not actually invented by someone else.

Sorry mention to say that

Ment to say that
Shitty auto correct

>He's a narcissistic anti-racist negro, so he calls IQ a pseudoscience because he unironically believes that intelligence is some mysterious force that isn't a byproduct of biology.

I pity him. He is in all threads writting the same things with a broken english.

Cognition is much too complicated to sum up in one factor.

>a broken english

Do you mean he writes in broken English?

How do you know that it's the same guy?

Attached: The+post+is+a+bait+itself+_922c6b7c4e249a35f315052b3712b014.jpg (200x200, 7K)

Sage

Attached: 28617030_166890280771406_1148393226728391472_o.jpg (1258x1406, 95K)

I pity him. He is in all threads writting the same things with a broken english.

merriam-webster.com/dictionary/irony