>she literally ruined her body
She literally ruined her body
Women shouldn't have a bf under 20%
She looks way better in the 2nd pic. First one has NO muscle definition.
Let's not act like it was actually appealing in the before photo
>trading breasts for delts
Absolutely disgusting.
Where did her tits go?
>she literally ruined her body
fuck off fat cow, she lost the tits the rest is fine
see
>Women shouldn't have a bf under 20%
I would say 15% is the bare minimum, nice slim with still big tits
Over 25% is disgusting
>this attracts the closet fag
her face looks like that of a drug addict due to the low bf, she would look better in between both
>ugly face
>uglier body to match
perfek
but...but...fit told me low bodyfat and getting muscular would make women more attractive!!
they said cardiobunnies doing basic bitch workouts are ugly and the girls who're cutting to single digit bodyfat and doing low doses were hot and ideal
Wow, divorce is one hell of a drug
I like boobs so kinda
JUST
what the FUCK happened to her face
She has a ring in the second picture, not the first.
You guys are morons. Clearly like ten years older in pic 2.
literally no one here says that faggot
Women with tits and ass between 20-23% bf are perfect.
She doesn’t look good on the right, but that’s competition ready. She probably looks much better two weeks after a competition than she did in her before pic.
This.
Women don't need muscles you fucking faggot
Women shouldn't have a bf under 30%.
women shouldn't have a bf
Men have even more muscle def you know. Maybe...
It all depends on where she gets the fat.
Any stomach at all is repulsive.
But if all the fat goes in the butt and thighs there is a lot more leeway