Muscular exertion is the primary catalyst to muscular growth. The main method of exerting muscles when in the pursuit of muscular growth is the process of lifting weights. Would it be more efficient to catalyze muscular growth by shocking muscles in a safe, yet powerful manner? My hypothesis is that a shocked muscle would be more damaged than a muscle that was used to lift weights, and would thus catalyze more muscular growth.
I would like to note that these electrical shocks would be powerful enough to make a muscle feel to the host as if it were lifting a host's one-repetition maximum weight. As you undergo muscular growth, the electrical shocks would strengthen in intensity.
The benefits of shocking muscles I believe are (1) less risk of injury, (2) more efficient muscular growth, and (3) less time necessary per workout.
Jaxson Clark
Why don't you go try that out and let us know how it goes. Sound good? Good.
Jose Reed
you know how incredibly painful a calf cramp is, when one muscle contracts full-force on its own, with no agonist to balance it or stabilize the joint?
imagine that on any ole muscle in your body
Liam Ortiz
No pain No gain.
Thomas Wright
even if you could get the muscle to think it's being used to move a huge amount of weight you're not damaging the muscles the way lifting damages the muscles and therefore you won't get the healing which is what makes them stronger and bigger
Anthony Garcia
This is false. When you lift a weight, the muscles necessary to lift the weight contract. Muscles contract due to naturally generated electrical currents within the body. Using manmade electrical currents to contract muscles effectively mimics naturally generated electrical currents.
Aiden Edwards
Make sure to do this to your brain cells too to catalyze neurons to grow too
Alexander Collins
In all seriousness, try it with a DYEL OP. Hardest thing will probably be getting them to eat
William Robinson
Read a physiology text book you fucking retard, your retarded and your hypothesis is retarded
Christian Reed
Your grammar is retarded. Ignoring your insults, in what way(s) is my hypothesis incorrect?
James Hall
you’re a fucking imbecile. you stupid fucking nigger
Jason Price
Ever been tazed? No thanks. Also >squat 315 >attach electrodes to toes to start workout >both knees dislocate as 250 pounds of force suddenly slams into the as they lock out
Still no thanks
Anthony Hill
>unironically still asking what’s wrong with hypothesis Ok I’ll bite. No muscle tension means no muscle breakdown and no growth. Using electric shock is like flexing your muscle and expecting them to grow. Also when the shock is strong enough it will stop your heart and lean mass is conductive to electricity
Joshua Diaz
>tfw eat onions and taze myself for maximum gains eat my dust, boyos.
Sebastian Edwards
but the damage isn't being done to the muscles no damage = no repairing = no gainz
Cooper Garcia
I think you misunderstand. Muscles are damaged by being contracted forcefully.
Angel Flores
>put my feet in my buckets of water >lie on the bench, grab bar loaded with lmao 2pl8 >down for 1 >bar contacts electrofied mechanical spotter and immediately shoots up >5 more reps fuck yeah >set a new or despite my own death
OP just invented a new type of deadlift mates
Joshua Cox
COMMIT SUICIDE RUDENIGGER
Aiden White
>thinks flexing is a workout
Ian Richardson
SeeYou'd do it loaded
Jason Flores
>shock your balls
Austin Hughes
What is balance ?
Dominic Bell
for an unopposed contraction to be strong enough to trigger hypertrophy, you would be screaming in pain. the opposing force is necessary
Isaiah Martinez
>what is a smith machine
Oliver Rivera
>using electricity to contract your muscles instead of just contracting them manually
Colton Wood
Artificial currents can contract a muscle more forcefully than you can naturally.
